@RandomGuy94 @financiern @SteveTexans @lolaisabitch
Looks like it was new evidence countering Suns’ filing of no infringement that Sun provided to the fda. I don’t understand all the legaleeze, and I’m thinking the “seal” is perhaps due to these new discoveries being “non-public” documents. In any case, it looks like it strengthens AUPH case - interesting way to get into the dry eye area, work already done by Sun (albeit illegally). Case should be settled by end of 22.