$EROS The vote on Monday isn't a vote on the merger agreement but rather a legally binding change to the Articles of Association that facilitates all if the legal changes needed for the merger, such as removing the 50% supervoting majority the Lullas hold today that can't be reversed for at least three years. Do you think the Lullas would move forward with that vote and remove their own majority control of the company if they were unsure of the Indian regulators? The US waiting period was over in May (Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976) and since then the US regulators have already approved the deal for STX.
  • 43