BTC

Bitcoin

Cricket is one of the most bet-on sports globally, driven by tournaments like the IPL, ICC World Cup, and T20 leagues. Crypto sportsbooks have become a practical option for cricket betting due to faster settlement, global access, and fewer onboarding barriers compared to traditional operators. This guide explains how crypto cricket betting works, what markets to expect, and which platforms handle global matches reliably. How Crypto Cricket Betting Works At a basic level, crypto cricket betting follows the same structure as traditional sportsbooks: Deposit cryptocurrency (BTC, USDT, ETH, etc.) Select a match or tournament Choose a market (match winner, runs, wickets, etc.) Place the bet and track it live The difference is in execution: Deposits: confirmed on-chain within minutes Withdrawals: often processed automatically without manual review Access: many platforms allow wallet-based or email sign-up without full KYC Tracking: some platforms log bets publicly for verification This matters in cricket, where matches can last hours or multiple days, and in-play betting requires low latency. Key Cricket Betting Markets Crypto sportsbooks typically cover the same core cricket markets: Match winner (team A vs team B) Top batsman / bowler Total runs (over/under) Session betting (runs in a specific over range) Live betting (ball-by-ball or over-by-over) Depth varies by platform. High-tier operators offer hundreds of live markets per match, especially for IPL and international fixtures. Best Crypto Platforms for Cricket Betting Dexsport Dexsport.io is a crypto-native sportsbook with broad sports coverage, including cricket alongside football, tennis, and esports. Cricket coverage: international matches and leagues, including in-play markets Markets: 100+ options per match across sports categories Access: instant signup via wallet, email, or Telegram, no KYC required A key differentiator is transparency. Bets are recorded on-chain and visible through a public betting desk, which allows users to verify outcomes independently. Strengths No KYC and fast onboarding Multi-chain support (40+ cryptocurrencies) Real-time betting tools like cash-out Limitations Focus on major cricket markets rather than niche leagues Cloudbet Cloudbet is one of the more established crypto sportsbooks, known for stable liquidity and high limits. Cricket coverage: strong for international tournaments and major leagues Markets: deep pre-match and live betting Payouts: automated withdrawals, typically within minutes to hours Strengths Reliable odds and market depth Suitable for larger stakes Limitations KYC may be required for withdrawals BetOnline BetOnline combines traditional sportsbook structure with crypto payments. Cricket coverage: includes international fixtures and niche markets Extra: dedicated racebook and multi-sport integration Withdrawals: crypto payouts typically completed within hours Strengths Strong market variety Familiar sportsbook interface Limitations Centralized model with possible KYC checks Stake Stake offers a wide sportsbook with competitive odds and strong live betting features. Cricket coverage: included among 30+ sports Features: live streaming, cash-out, detailed stats Transactions: near-instant deposits, withdrawals within minutes to 24 hours Strengths Smooth live betting interface Competitive margins Limitations KYC required for withdrawals BetPanda BetPanda focuses on privacy and simplicity. Cricket coverage: mainstream matches with live betting Access: no KYC unless flagged Transactions: fast crypto deposits and withdrawals Strengths Anonymous betting experience Simple onboarding Limitations Limited depth in advanced cricket markets What to Look for in a Crypto Cricket Sportsbook When choosing a platform, the differences are operational rather than cosmetic: Market depth: IPL and World Cup coverage should include live props Latency: faster platforms update odds more frequently during live play Payout speed: crypto-native platforms typically outperform hybrid ones KYC policy: impacts withdrawal reliability and limits Liquidity: affects odds quality, especially for high-volume bets Risks to Consider Crypto betting removes friction but introduces specific risks: Price volatility: your balance value may change between deposit and withdrawal Withdrawal flags: some platforms request verification for large wins Jurisdiction issues: access depends on local laws Market gaps: smaller leagues may have limited betting options Understanding these factors is essential before placing large or frequent bets. Final Take Crypto cricket betting is driven by speed and access. The ability to deposit instantly, place live bets without delays, and withdraw without banking friction aligns well with the pace of modern cricket markets. Dexsport offers one of the cleanest implementations of this model, combining no-KYC access, multi-chain support, and transparent bet tracking. For higher limits and deeper liquidity, platforms like Cloudbet remain relevant. Hybrid operators like BetOnline provide broader market coverage but retain traditional constraints. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Crypto gambling platforms fall into three distinct models. The differences matter. They affect custody of funds, withdrawal speed, privacy, and how much control you actually have over your bets. Crypto-native: built around wallets and blockchain logic Hybrid platforms: accept crypto but still rely on accounts and partial KYC Fiat-first casinos: traditional operators with crypto added as a payment rail This guide focuses on top crypto gambling platforms first, then benchmarks them against the alternatives. Defining “Crypto-Native” Gambling A crypto-native gambling site removes banking infrastructure entirely. No cards, no intermediaries, no custodial friction. Core traits: Wallet-based access (MetaMask, Trust Wallet, etc.) No mandatory KYC Deposits and withdrawals on-chain Transparent bet settlement or public ledgers Multi-chain support This structure changes the user experience. Funds stay under user control, transactions settle in minutes, and there’s no dependency on payment processors. Top Crypto-Native Gambling Sites 1. Dexsport — Full Wallet Access, On-Chain Transparency Dexsport.io is a clear reference point for fully crypto-native gambling. Access: Email, Telegram, or direct wallet connect KYC: None Coins: 38+ across 20 networks Games: 10,000+ Key feature: Public on-chain bet tracking Dexsport operates as a decentralized sportsbook and casino with full wallet integration. Users can connect directly via MetaMask or similar wallets and start betting without identity checks. Every wager is logged transparently, with a public betting desk showing live bets and outcomes. This creates a verifiable system rather than a closed backend. Transactions are fast and typically fee-free on the platform side. Funds move directly between wallet and platform without banking rails. The platform combines sportsbook depth with a large casino library, including slots, live dealer games, and crash mechanics. Positioning: Fully crypto-native. No reliance on banks. Full user control. 2. CoinCasino — Blockchain-Based Casino Infrastructure KYC: Not required for most users Coins: BTC, ETH, USDT, SOL, DOGE Games: 4,000+ Focus: Casino-first with provably fair systems CoinCasino runs entirely on blockchain infrastructure, with instant deposits and fast withdrawals. It supports wallet-driven play and emphasizes privacy. Positioning: Crypto-native casino with strong anonymity and simplicity. 3. BetPanda — Anonymous Crypto Betting with Minimal Friction KYC: Not required unless flagged Coins: 13+ Focus: Balanced casino + sportsbook BetPanda offers full anonymity in standard use, with quick crypto transactions and a simple onboarding flow. It does not require identity verification unless triggered by specific conditions. Positioning: Crypto-native leaning, with lighter infrastructure than Dexsport. 4. Cryptorino — Fast Transactions, Minimal Registration KYC: Not required for basic use Games: 6,000+ Speed: Minutes to hours for withdrawals Cryptorino focuses on speed and accessibility, combining sportsbook and casino under one account with minimal onboarding requirements. Positioning: Crypto-first platform with simplified access and fast payouts. 5. Telbet — Telegram + Wallet Integration Access: Telegram, WalletConnect KYC: Not mandatory Focus: Mobile-first crypto betting Telbet integrates messaging platforms with crypto gambling. Users can register and bet directly through Telegram or wallet connections, keeping the process lightweight and fast. Positioning: Crypto-native with strong mobile and messaging integration. How Hybrid Platforms Compare Hybrid platforms accept crypto but retain traditional account structures. Examples: Stake, Vave, Cloudbet Typical traits: Email-based accounts Crypto deposits supported KYC often required at withdrawal stage Backend remains centralized For example: Stake allows crypto betting but requires KYC before withdrawals. Cloudbet processes crypto quickly but may request identity verification depending on volume. Vave offers strong live betting but enforces KYC beyond thresholds. Implication: Faster than fiat platforms, but still dependent on operator control. Fiat-First Casinos: Crypto as an Add-On Traditional operators treat crypto as a payment method, not infrastructure. Examples: BetMGM, Bet365, DraftKings Characteristics: Full KYC required upfront Bank-linked accounts Slower withdrawals (often days) Geographic restrictions These platforms operate under strict regulatory frameworks. Anonymous play is not possible, and all transactions are tied to verified identities. Implication: High compliance, low flexibility. Top Crypto-Native Gambling Sites Feature Crypto-Native (Dexsport) Hybrid Platforms Fiat-First Casinos Account type Wallet / minimal account Email account Full account KYC None Conditional Mandatory Custody User-controlled Platform-controlled Platform-controlled Withdrawals Minutes Minutes to hours Days Transparency On-chain / public logs Limited Opaque backend Bank reliance None Partial Full Key Takeaways Crypto-native platforms shift control to the user. Dexsport illustrates the model clearly: direct wallet access no banking layer transparent bet tracking multi-chain support Hybrid platforms offer convenience but retain centralized controls. Fiat-first casinos prioritize regulation over flexibility. For users focused on speed, privacy, and control, crypto-native platforms define the category.

Summary Bitcoin miners are pivoting to AI and HPC hosting as mining profitability declines, leveraging energy infrastructure for higher returns. I favor IREN, BITF, and RIOT for their strong fundamentals, expansion projects, and early traction in AI/cloud contracts or partnerships. IREN stands out with a $9.7B, 10-year Microsoft contract, positive adjusted EBITDA, and visible progress transitioning to AI revenues. Key risks include ongoing Bitcoin dependency, high sector volatility, rich valuations, and potential dilution from equity funding. As a bitcoin ( BTC-USD ) investor for almost 8 years, I think I'm used to volatility. Bitcoin miners aren't immune to the volatility of their own end products. But the largest by market capitalization are now transforming their business to become AI and HPC hosting providers. Or at least, that's what they are trying to do. The business shift comes from declining revenues from Bitcoin mining and the revenue boom generated by AI, especially thanks to the capital expenditures of hyperscalers. The problem miners are facing is the decline in Bitcoin which, after reaching an all-time high of $122,000 last October, sharply dropped to $64,000 in February. Despite the recent rebound, the drop has been significant over the past few years. I was very surprised when I looked at which instrument performed better over the past five years: Bitcoin or the S&P500 ( SPY ). I thought Bitcoin was the instrument that outperformed the market. But I was wrong. Data by YCharts In this article I wrote why I no longer want to hold Bitcoin, and that I'm just waiting for the right moment to sell and take some profits on the investment I made in 2018. I don't want to own any more Bitcoin because I thought it would be more widely adopted in the future, especially as a medium of exchange that would start replacing the dollar bill. But it wasn't like that. Profitability problems of crypto miners Besides my own interpretation about bitcoin and its price, mining companies are losing revenue and profitability due to the drop in hashrate . In this case, it's not just that Bitcoin has fallen to 2024 lows that matters, but that the key profitability unit for miners is far from 2021 levels. This is a result, in my opinion, of increased competition, which drove up energy consumption in the global mining network. We must add to this the 2024 Bitcoin halving, which, while boosting the price, didn't help miners regain profitability. In other words: Bitcoin miners' revenue per hashrate dropped from approximately $400 in 2021 to around $50 by early 2026. Bloomberg At these hashprice levels, even if Bitcoin returns to its all-time highs, recovering past profitability levels seems very unlikely. Let's take into account that the fifth halving will occur in 2028 , so profitability could decrease further. It's true there is also an opportunity, but the price should rise significantly more. I'll use Riot Platforms ( RIOT ) as an example. In their 2025 10K, on ​​slide 45, the cost per bitcoin was $91,427, yielding a 10% return. If bitcoin doesn't strongly surpass that figure, 2026 will be a challenging year for RIOT. This is just one example. Later, I'll analyze the situation of both RIOT and its peers. With these examples, I wanted to highlight some of the reasons that could explain the shift miners are experiencing. And they're doing so with the goal of making the most of their energy capacity. After all, crypto mining, as any other business, relies on generating higher revenues than costs. Energy costs weren't necessarily the problem for miners: it was their declining revenue. That's where the opportunity arose to join the AI ​​boom, which requires a lot of energy to operate. The AI ​​transition factor Basically, the simple explanation is that AI demand was so strong in the last three years that data centers, historically needed for HPC, went from measuring their power in kilowatts to megawatts and gigawatts. So, more energy from all sources will be needed, and much of that energy was previously used for cryptomining. Next, I'll show you a chart that I found very telling about this boom. Bitfarms The image was taken from an investor presentation by Bitfarms ( KEEL ), a miner that is transitioning into an AI data center company, which will now be called Keel Infrastructure. The change of the curve is very evident. In 2022, kilowatt contracts rose 15%, the highest increase since 2006 (green line). With increased energy demand, AI data centers are becoming key to the infrastructure that supports modern computing. And a big part of the investment needed by AI is directed toward energy. It doesn't matter if the language models for AI are for inference or training, if they use chips from Nvidia ( NVDA ) or Advanced Micro Devices ( AMD ), or if they use memory from Micron Technology ( MU ) or Samsung Electronics ( SSNLF ) All data centers need energy with a lot of power. That's why I really like this type of investment. It's a picks-and-shovels investment. By 2030, data centers could be the largest consumer of electricity globally, second only to three countries. IMF Which bitcoin mining companies are driving this transformation? By the end of 2026, Bitcoin miners could derive nearly 70% of their revenue from supplying AI data centers. But there are some differences in the sector. Some miners want to become major players due to contracts signed with hyperscalers for cloud services. In almost every case, those contracts are backed by plans to build large data centers and projections of high growth in installed capacity. To put in order the players of this transformation, I ranked the companies by installed capacity in the following table. Author’s Tabulations I took the main 10 players per market cap. Not all of them have the same progress nor the same goals. The mining companies that already have partnerships with hyperscalers are IREN , HUT , CIFR , WULF , and CORZ . Those pivoting with significant contracts are RIOT, KEEL, APLD , MARA , and CLSK . Every earnings call, management talks about progress in their transition. This is something I find really interesting, even without concrete contracts yet. To sum up, there is a lot of variety in the business plan of each company. So, in the following lines I'll focus on providing a brief overview of each company's situation. Because although I like them all as investment opportunities, they are not all moving at the same pace. Besides, I believe it's very important to evaluate purchase prices and profitability. The most common thing will be to see net losses and low returns, as in any transition. However, not all companies lose at the same rate or share the same trend. Summary of each company: expansion projects and profitability I'll follow the order of the previous chart. IREN has the largest installed capacity (4.5 GW) and will present its Q3 FY2026 results on May 13. In the previous quarter, the net loss was $155 million, with revenues of $185 million. Adjustments to non-recurring monetary items can distort the net income analysis. I believe Adjusted EBITDA could be a more useful metric to analyse earnings. In this case, IREN had an adjusted EBITDA of $75 million against the $62 million of the same period the previous year. IREN But what makes IREN very interesting is that it counts on Microsoft Corporation ( MSFT ) as a key hyperscaler partner. The contract signed with MSFT is for $9.7 billion over 10 years . Moreover, the contract also helped IREN secure $3.6 billion in credit, allowing it to borrow $3.6 billion. IREN still derives 91% of its revenue from Bitcoin mining. That's why, both in the next quarter and in subsequent ones, I expect to see that percentage steadily decline. CIFR, which has recently changed its name to Cipher Digital, is another key player with a strong installed power capacity and a contract with Fluidstack, a cloud infrastructure operator backed by Alphabet ( GOOG ). But CIFR has something else: Amazon ( AMZN ). With both contracts, it projects revenues of $9 billion. For now, CIFR's revenue is still 100% crypto mining, but I also expect to see some AI lines added soon. The earnings presentation will be in May. In 2025, CIFR's revenue was $224 million , compared to $151 million in 2024. The net loss was $822 million, driven by expenses and machine depreciation, leaving an adjusted EBITDA of $40 million. WULF also has agreements with Fluidstack and financial backing from Google. WULF has contracted revenue of $13 billion for the next 10-25 years. Like IREN and CORZ, WULF has an HPC revenue line item on its FY2025 balance sheet . This amounted to $17 million of the total $168 million. Net losses increased from $62 million in 2024 to $661 million in 2025. Meanwhile, Adjusted EBITDA was negative by $23 million. APLD has confidentiality agreements with its major clients. Last Thursday , the company announced a new contract for its data center Delta Forge 1, which has 430 MW but I don't know who the hyperscaler tenant is. Total revenue is estimated at $7.5 billion for the next 15 years. Wes Commins, its CEO, says he wants to achieve contracts with five big hyperscalers : Microsoft ( MSFT ), Meta Platforms ( META ), Oracle ( ORCL ), Amazon ( AMZN ) and Google ( GOOG ). Currently, its financial statements ( the latest being for Q3 FY26 ) show no revenue streams related to AI. Net losses in the last nine months of FY2026 were $138 million, a smaller amount than the same period the previous year, $179 million. I see KEEL as a smaller player, but with great potential. The company expects to be a key hosting provider for NVDA's Vera Rubin GPUs, which could be commercially available by the end of this year. The campus to house Vera Rubin is Panther Creek, a data center project in Pennsylvania with the goal of exceeding 500 MW. The company had losses of $284 million in FY2025 , while adjusted EBITDA was positive, at $28 million (-8% YoY). CLSK has a contracted capacity of 1.8 GW, of which almost 1.2 GW corresponds to the States of Texas and Georgia. The company has already presented its Q1 2026 results, and both earnings and adjusted EBITDA fell into negative territory. The net loss was $378 million and the adjusted EBITDA was negative at $295 million, in line with the profitability lows seen across its peers. I believe CLSK is in an earlier phase of adaptation, and it still doesn't have any contracts or major clients to show. In the case of RIOT, there isn't a clear hyperscaler, but it does work with AMD, with whom it signed a contract for 200 MW at the high end of the supply range. I believe Riot has an advantage, which is that it can demonstrate clear operational capacity of up to 1.8 GW, including the contract with AMD. Anyway, RIOT doesn't escape the difficult situation of Bitcoin mining, with projected losses of $663 million in 2025 (slide 34). Adjusted EBITDA remained positive at $12 million, although this was a significant decrease compared to the $463 million of 2024. MARA has a strategic partnership with Starwood Capital Group, a specialized firm in real estate developments for hyperscalers. The agreement is estimated to achieve an installed capacity of 1 GW in the short term and reach 2.5 GW in the future. In Q4 2025 I saw a pronounced negative adjusted EBITDA of $1.4 billion, almost double the $795 million of the same period of the previous year. HUT reported revenues of $235 million in 2025 , compared to $162 million in 2024, and net losses of $248 million. From the $235 million of total income, $115 million were from bitcoin production. Only $7.4 million was generated from AI cloud services. When compared with IREN, with its 8-9% AI revenue share, HUT's revenues are only 3-4%. HUT also experienced a decline in adjusted EBITDA, with a negative result of $135 million, compared to $556 million in 2024. Although the results don't seem so great, HUT announced in December a contract backed by Google, with an agreement of $7 billion to supply 245 MW , which, like WULF and CIFR, is through Fluidstack. Hut 8 Corp CORZ has an installed capacity of 1.3 GW and supply contracts for 1.5 GW , thanks to its main partner, CoreWeave, which is also a strategic partner of NVDA. CORZ has a 12-year agreement with ARR, estimated at $850 million. The company has more diversification than others, and is present in 7 states. What I like most about CORZ is that it's already showing an HPC hosting segment called Colocation (slide 58 of the 10-K report ). And that allows it to show some advantages in gross margins, which increased 19% in 2025. Net losses were $288 million, but they were less than the $1.4 billion of 2024. Core Scientific My three favorite stocks While I believe there are really interesting long term investment opportunities, I also think some of them are showing more success than others. In my case, I'm going with IREN, KEEL and RIOT. Once again: I believe those companies have very solid fundamentals to make a long term investment. I'm choosing IREN for its capacity, trust and guarantee of having MSFT behind, an estimated ARR of $3.44 billion, and because its adjusted EBITDA shows a positive trend. Besides, I believe its progress in the transition is very solid. Although only 9% of their revenue comes from cloud AI services, that's already more than other miners. In the case of KEEL and RIOT, there isn't a strong contract in sight, but I believe their expansion projects are solid enough to supply energy to a hyperscaler. Both have a positive adjusted EBITDA, although with a declining trend. But RIOT already has AMD as a partner, while KEEL seems to point to NVDA, as I said before. This is very interesting because the announcement of signed contracts with hyperscalers gives a boost to the share price of the leasing company, to the point where you could end up late to the game and buy at a high price. That's why RIOT and KEEL, although they haven't signed big contracts, are cheap options to take advantage of. Investment Risks: volatility, valuations and funding One of the main risks of investing in crypto mining is, still, volatility. Since they all still depend heavily on Bitcoin, both its price and the daily hashrate per unit, the AI infrastructure business still looks far away. If there is no concrete progress by 2026, for example, with all companies adding a line item related to AI to their balance sheets, I think it could generate distrust in the markets. As with companies that transform their business, uncertainty is higher, and therefore, so is the potential reward. I believe valuations represent another investment risk because markets reward future income very quickly without considering direct competition, among other factors. The case of IREN shares, for example, which reached all-time highs at the end of 2025 (around $76) and, almost six months ago, were unable to strongly break above $60. The risk would be buying the best performers at the wrong price. Finally, funding through share issuance can hurt shareholder confidence. In my case, I'm closely following RIOT's share issuance, which slowed down in 2025 compared to previous years. I believe this is a risk to keep a close eye on for any company in the sector. Conclusions The lower Bitcoin mining profitability in recent years has pushed many miners to shift toward hosting AI and HPC workloads, taking advantage of the large investments that hyperscalers are making in data centers. Basically, the goal is to use their existing energy infrastructure and turn it into a more profitable business. I tried to show an overview of the sector using the top 10 publicly traded Bitcoin mining companies and analyze their differences. As with any investment in naturally volatile assets, there are underlying risks, and I believe we must take them into account, among them high valuations and financing methods. I am choosing just three companies (IREN, KEEL, and RIOT). I am open to changing my portfolio in the medium term. However, given my enthusiasm for the future of electricity demand, I believe any of these 10 companies could serve as exposure to the sector.

A second straight day of outflows in bitcoin and ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) points to a cooling phase in institutional demand, even as selective inflows in XRP suggest pockets of opportunistic positioning. Key Takeaways: Bitcoin ETFs saw $89.68M outflows on Apr 28, led by Blackrock IBIT’s $112.25M exit. Ether ETFs lost $21.80M as Blackrock ETHA

Czech NB Governor Michl praised BTC reserves at Bitcoin 2026. Tests increased returns, issued volatility warning. Current price $76,670, strong support levels in place. Bank created pilot portfolio...

In an interview with CNBC, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev said the company now has 11 business lines that generate $100 million or more in annual revenue.

A new report says the U.S. military is testing Bitcoin for cybersecurity use. Here is what the claim suggests, why it matters, and what to watch next. Read original article on marketbit.net

Bitcoin Conference 2027 will return to Nashville, bringing the world’s largest Bitcoin event back to its roots after two years in Las Vegas.

Binance has announced it will be launching a new futures product to offer users more trading options. Continue Reading: Bitcoin Exchange Binance Announces Listing of This Altcoin on its Futures Trading Platform! Here Are the Details