SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1

Novo Nordisk A/S is a global healthcare company, which engages in the discovery, development, manufacturing and marketing of pharmaceutical products. It operates through the Diabetes and Obesity Care, and Rare Disease segments. The Diabetes and Obesity Care segment includes diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular, and emerging therapy areas. The Rare Disease segment refers to rare blood disorders, rare endocrine disorders, and hormone replacement therapy. The company was founded by Harald Pedersen and Thorvald Pedersen in 1923 is headquartered in Bagsværd, Denmark.

Novo Nordisk - ADR

Novo Nordisk A/S

Novo Nordisk is a key trending stock following the FDA approval of its oral Wegovy, marking the first GLP-1 pill for weight management. The community views this as a significant game-changer, offering convenience over injections and potentially giving NVO a crucial first-mover advantage against competitors like Eli Lilly in the expanding obesity market. Many investors believe this catalyst, coupled with the stock's perceived undervaluation, positions Novo Nordisk for a substantial rebound despite some initial market skepticism.

Solana is a highly functional open source project that banks on blockchain technology’s permissionless nature to provide decentralized finance (DeFi) solutions. It is a layer 1 network that offers fast speeds and affordable costs. While the idea and initial work on the project began in 2017, Solana was officially launched in March 2020 by the Solana Foundation with headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland.

Solana

Solana is experiencing a surge in conversation driven by the "Green Revolution" narrative, as community members highlight its role as the preferred blockchain for cannabis-related projects. Recent discussions center on federal policy shifts, such as the Schedule III reclassification and the implications of the 280E tax changes, which are seen as significant catalysts for tokens building on Solana. This momentum is fueling bullish sentiment, with many viewing Solana's speed and efficiency as critical for the future of on-chain cannabis finance.

Sable Offshore Corp. engages in offshore oil and gas field operations. It focuses on developing the prolific Santa Ynez Unit in federal waters offshore California. The company was founded by James C. Flores on October 16, 2020 and is headquartered in Houston, TX.

Sable Offshore Corp.

Sable Offshore Corp. is trending following federal approval to restart its Las Flores Pipeline, a critical development that places regulatory authority under federal oversight and bypasses previous state-level hurdles. This news has generated strong bullish sentiment within the community, with many seeing it as a significant de-risking event for the company's California offshore oil assets. Traders are actively discussing the potential for a momentum-driven rally and short squeeze, even amidst lingering concerns about Sable Offshore's financial standing.

$WAGMI is a community-driven meme token built on the Solana blockchain, designed to bring positivity, unity, and humor into the crypto space. The project encourages community engagement through memes, social interaction, and token-based activities. It leverages Solana’s fast and low-cost infrastructure to allow for smooth on-chain interactions, such as token transfers, community games, and NFT integration. The goal is to foster a fun, inclusive ecosystem where holders feel they are part of a larger movement – "We Are Gonna Make It."

WAGMI

WAGMI CRYPTO is capturing attention, largely fueled by its "We're All Gonna Make It" ethos and a highly engaged community. Discussions highlight strong bullish sentiment, increasing platform visibility, and enthusiasm for its future within the crypto space.

Starfighters Space Inc

Starfighters Space Inc. (FJET) is a focal point of discussion following extreme post-IPO volatility, marked by a significant price drop after an initial surge. Community sentiment is sharply divided, with some anticipating a short squeeze and substantial bounce due to low float and high short fees, while others warn of a 'pump and dump' given the company's pre-revenue status and questioned fundamentals. Traders are actively debating the speculative nature of this aerospace sector play.

Tesla, Inc. engages in the design, development, manufacture, and sale of electric vehicles and energy generation and storage systems. It operates through the Automotive and Energy Generation and Storage segments. The Automotive segment includes the design, development, manufacture, sale, and lease of electric vehicles as well as sales of automotive regulatory credits. The Energy Generation and Storage segment is involved in the design, manufacture, installation, sale, and lease of solar energy generation, energy storage products, and related services and sales of solar energy systems incentives. The company was founded by Jeffrey B. Straubel, Elon Reeve Musk, Martin Eberhard, and Marc Tarpenning on July 1, 2003 and is headquartered in Austin, TX.

Tesla Inc

Tesla is experiencing highly polarized sentiment as analysts issue conflicting outlooks, raising long-term price targets based on AI and robotaxi potential while simultaneously cutting near-term delivery estimates due to softening EV demand. The community is sharply divided, with bulls advocating to "buy the dip" for a push to new highs, while bears highlight the company's high valuation and unfulfilled promises amidst decelerating sales. Traders are actively debating whether the stock can overcome significant resistance and sustain its recent rally.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. engages in the exploration, mining, and development of gold and silver properties. The company was founded on August 28, 2017 and is headquartered in Winnemucca, NV.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation - Ordinary Shares - Class A

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp

Hycroft Mining is trending due to recent drill results revealing high-grade silver in its Vortex system, exciting investors about the potential of its Nevada mine amidst a strengthening precious metals market. This positive exploration news is amplified by notable institutional buying, though community discussion is divided between bullish predictions for significant gains and concerns about potential share offerings and past stock performance.

SSgA Active Trust - SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF

The SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF ($DIA) is trending higher amidst robust economic data, including a strong GDP report and cooling inflation signals, leading to new market highs. The community is actively discussing a potential year-end rally and a notable rotation of capital from high-growth tech stocks into more established industrial names. Despite the bullish sentiment, some traders express caution regarding the sustainability of these gains, pointing to concerns around market dynamics and global central bank policy. 

AppLovin Corp. engages in the development and operation of a mobile marketing platform. It offers AppDiscovery, MAX, Adjust, and SparkLabs. Its software-based platform caters to mobile application developers to improve the marketing and monetization of applications. The company was founded by Andrew Karam, John Krystynak, and Adam Foroughi in 2011 and is headquartered in Palo Alto, CA.

Applovin Corp - Ordinary Shares - Class A

Applovin Corp

Applovin (APP) is trending due to recent analyst upgrades and strong bullish momentum, with conversation centering on its AI-driven ad platform, AXON, and expansion into new verticals. This upward trajectory is sparking a polarized debate, as proponents highlight robust growth, while critics voice concerns over extreme valuation, insider selling, and an ongoing SEC probe.

VisionWave Holdings, Inc. engages in the forefront of revolutionizing defense capabilities by integrating advanced artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous solutions across air, ground, and sea domains. The company was founded on September 3, 2024 and is headquartered in Wilmington, DE.

VisionWave Holdings Inc.

VisionWave Holdings, Inc.

VisionWave Holdings is gaining significant attention following a new patent for its AI-powered motion detection technology, enhancing its profile in the defense and autonomous systems sector. Community discussions are highly concentrated on the company's low share float and recent allegations of naked shorting, fueling widespread speculation of a potential market squeeze. Many view VisionWave as an undervalued contender in the burgeoning AI and drone defense landscape, poised for substantial growth.

statis crypto Watchlist

Bitcoin

Ethereum

Ripple

Dogecoin

Cardano

statis IN Watchlist

Nifty 50

Nifty Bank

Reliance Industries Ltd.

Zomato Ltd.

Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Motors Ltd.

HDFC Bank Ltd.

ITC Ltd.

Adani Enterprises Ltd

Axis Bank Ltd

Bajaj Finance Ltd

statis US Watchlist

SPDR S&P 500 ETF

Apple Inc.

Microsoft Corporation

NVIDIA Corp

 Hey, I want to invite you to join Stocktwits. It’s the largest global community of active traders. You’ll get access to the real-time market insights, news, discussion and much more! You can sign up using my unique link below 
 


 has invited you to join Stocktwits

$BINI (1/n) This (long) thread is in response to the challenge that @FlashFrozenSushi gave me to find some &quot;dirt&quot; on the CEO and post it. He blocked me before I could complete writing it out, but I am following through with posting because I said that I would do so. 
 
The context for this is Michery&#39;s statements about &quot;lithium-air battery technology&quot; from the Risk On interview he gave on June 1. 
https://youtu.be/sqDCTeZzqdA?t=727 
 
At the 12:07 mark, Michery made the following statement: 
“Ultimately the Holy Grail of battery technology would be like a lithium air technology, and we’ve been exploring that for quite some time. You know, we started back in 2017 exploring those possibilities with IBM, and we looked at a coin sized cell that potentially could be the Holy Grail of battery technology which would be on par, if not greater than, the efficiency of gasoline.”

Roedy

Hu Kok

Mr. XMX

Two Seasons Limited

Expired ;)

PatSim

R. Thomas

🔥 RISK ON 📈 - Episode 227 - Todd Ault and Jason Bartholomew! 🔥"Make sure you click to subscribe and check out our other content. Always Great things h...

YouTube

🔥RISK ON🔥 EP. 227 JUNE 1st 2022

StockTwits Web

Bollinger Innovations Inc

$MULN (1/n) This (long) thread is in response to the challenge that 

 gave me to find some "dirt" on the CEO and post it. He blocked me before I could complete writing it out, but I am following through with posting because I said that I would do so. 
 
The context for this is Michery's statements about "lithium-air battery technology" from the Risk On interview he gave on June 1. 


 
 
At the 12:07 mark, Michery made the following statement: 
“Ultimately the Holy Grail of battery technology would be like a lithium air technology, and we’ve been exploring that for quite some time. You know, we started back in 2017 exploring those possibilities with IBM, and we looked at a coin sized cell that potentially could be the Holy Grail of battery technology which would be on par, if not greater than, the efficiency of gasoline.”

Kendall Payne

(2) Later on at the 23:56 mark Michery stated: 
“Ultimately, my ultimate goal… look I haven’t given up on lithium air technology. I paid a lot of money to IBM for that, a lot of money, so I’m gonna progress that as much as I can now. Look, I’m not promising I’m gonna get to the finish line but I got engineers that are gonna be dedicated to try to get that IP and solve the issues: (1)the air handling, and (2)the hydrogen peroxide on the cathode, the build up. And maybe somewhere down the line, Mullen could have a lithium air solution that would progress Mullen into the year 3000.” 
 
Michery seems to be implying that Mullen had an ongoing agreement with IBM for lithium-air battery technology. He makes the direct claim that Mullen “paid a lot of money to IBM for that, a lot of money” and implies that work and progress on lithium air battery technology directly stemming from this agreement has been continuing at Mullen. He gives no reasons for a listener to suspect there are any concerns.

Ken Novak

(3) But public court records and Mullen Automotive’s own SEC filings indicate that this 2017 agreement failed to progress, and in fact IBM filed a lawsuit against Mullen on May 7, 2019 claiming breach of contract of the original agreement due to failure to pay on Mullen&#39;s part. 
 
This case was filed with the New York Westchester Supreme Court and can be found under Index Number 57306/2019. Judgment against Mullen was issued on Dec. 1, 2021 in the amount of $5.6M. The liability from this litigation has been reported (though buried) in Mullen SEC filings like the 10-Q/A, and even on the day that Michery was giving this interview the company was still appealing the court order to pay IBM.

(3) But public court records and Mullen Automotive’s own SEC filings indicate that this 2017 agreement failed to progress, and in fact IBM filed a lawsuit against Mullen on May 7, 2019 claiming breach of contract of the original agreement due to failure to pay on Mullen's part. 
 
This case was filed with the New York Westchester Supreme Court and can be found under Index Number 57306/2019. Judgment against Mullen was issued on Dec. 1, 2021 in the amount of $5.6M. The liability from this litigation has been reported (though buried) in Mullen SEC filings like the 10-Q/A, and even on the day that Michery was giving this interview the company was still appealing the court order to pay IBM.

(4) As late as the Friday before the interview (which took place on Weds) Mullen&#39;s attorney had filed an appeal, and on the date of the interview there was no evidence showing that Mullen had made ANY payment to IBM. This seems to directly contradict Michery&#39;s statement that he &quot;paid a lot of money to IBM.&quot;

(4) As late as the Friday before the interview (which took place on Weds) Mullen's attorney had filed an appeal, and on the date of the interview there was no evidence showing that Mullen had made ANY payment to IBM. This seems to directly contradict Michery's statement that he "paid a lot of money to IBM."

@KendallP @FlashFrozenSushi that is dirt? lol oh ok.  
BLOCKED !

Alan

jeffery king

(5) It is not until June 7, nearly a week after the interview, that IBM&#39;s attorney submits receipt of payment from Mullen for the full amount of the judgment. Now, without insider knowledge of when Mullen actually wrote and sent IBM the $5.6M check for the judgment, we cannot prove that Michery did not make that payment on the Monday or Tuesday just before his interview, but it seems unlikely that Mullen&#39;s attorney would file a motion for appeal and then the company would completely turn around and pay the judgment on the next business day. 
 
More importantly, it seems to me that Michery is lying by omission in implying to the unsuspecting listener that the agreement between Mullen and IBM was in good standing while failing to disclose that the &quot;payment&quot; was in the form of a $5.6M lawsuit judgment against Mullen for breach of contract.

Kirne

(5) It is not until June 7, nearly a week after the interview, that IBM's attorney submits receipt of payment from Mullen for the full amount of the judgment. Now, without insider knowledge of when Mullen actually wrote and sent IBM the $5.6M check for the judgment, we cannot prove that Michery did not make that payment on the Monday or Tuesday just before his interview, but it seems unlikely that Mullen's attorney would file a motion for appeal and then the company would completely turn around and pay the judgment on the next business day. 
 
More importantly, it seems to me that Michery is lying by omission in implying to the unsuspecting listener that the agreement between Mullen and IBM was in good standing while failing to disclose that the "payment" was in the form of a $5.6M lawsuit judgment against Mullen for breach of contract.

(6) In addition, as part of the argument made by Mullen&#39;s attorney for why Mullen should not be required to pay IBM, both Michery and Calin Popa (President) testified under oath that what they had received from IBM was essentially worthless and irrelevant to the company. For example, here is Michery&#39;s testimony that the specialist they hired to evaluate the data from IBM &quot;rendered an opinion that there was nothing there of any substantive...&quot; and that it was more just &quot;advertising materials rather than substantive research documents.&quot;

(6) In addition, as part of the argument made by Mullen's attorney for why Mullen should not be required to pay IBM, both Michery and Calin Popa (President) testified under oath that what they had received from IBM was essentially worthless and irrelevant to the company. For example, here is Michery's testimony that the specialist they hired to evaluate the data from IBM "rendered an opinion that there was nothing there of any substantive..." and that it was more just "advertising materials rather than substantive research documents."

(7) Here is Michery&#39;s statement that the files they received from IBM was &quot;Very limited data, none of relevance.&quot;

(7) Here is Michery's statement that the files they received from IBM was "Very limited data, none of relevance."

(8) Here is Calin Popa testifying that Mullen was not able to use ANY of the information to develop an air lithium battery.

really?

@KendallP @FlashFrozenSushi just remember Kendall has no position a paid posted and posts bs. He is a paid poster please report him

StockTwits for iOS

 just remember Kendall has no position a paid posted and posts bs. He is a paid poster please report him

Charles L

@KendallP what was the total contract amount for and what was the scope that IBM was to perform and deliver?   
 
you have no idea, bc contracts of this size have installment and milestone payments and this was likely the remaining balance of 10-25% of the contract amount.  Maybe MULN did not agree that IBM had fulfilled its obligations under the terms of the agreement and disputed and withheld the last milestone payment.   
 
Having a claim filed against you and the other party being awarded a judgment on a business contract is not considered “dirt”.  Parties in this industry on both sides of a deal need to perform and there are too many variables to speculate.   
 
I highly doubt a company as astute IBM would engage on a project without obtaining a substantial down payment or upfront fee. 
 
This is the most incriminating piece of data you could “dig up”?  Should have saved yourself some time and not even posted. 
  
Iv’e already wasted too much time responding!

 what was the total contract amount for and what was the scope that IBM was to perform and deliver?   
 
you have no idea, bc contracts of this size have installment and milestone payments and this was likely the remaining balance of 10-25% of the contract amount.  Maybe MULN did not agree that IBM had fulfilled its obligations under the terms of the agreement and disputed and withheld the last milestone payment.   
 
Having a claim filed against you and the other party being awarded a judgment on a business contract is not considered “dirt”.  Parties in this industry on both sides of a deal need to perform and there are too many variables to speculate.   
 
I highly doubt a company as astute IBM would engage on a project without obtaining a substantial down payment or upfront fee. 
 
This is the most incriminating piece of data you could “dig up”?  Should have saved yourself some time and not even posted. 
  
Iv’e already wasted too much time responding!

Matt Kau

@LongJohnEquities The total contract amount owed for the initial phase was $4.5M. There were additional milestones, including royalties payable, as the work progressed, but Mullen did not make even this initial payment, as summarized in the judge&#39;s decision on Dec. 1, 2020. 
 
The terms of the contract were included in the exhibits for the trial. You are free to look up all the documents yourself as I have given all that you need to find the records.

 The total contract amount owed for the initial phase was $4.5M. There were additional milestones, including royalties payable, as the work progressed, but Mullen did not make even this initial payment, as summarized in the judge's decision on Dec. 1, 2020. 
 
The terms of the contract were included in the exhibits for the trial. You are free to look up all the documents yourself as I have given all that you need to find the records.

@KendallP I don’t have time but will agree that you’ve done the research and it’s appreciated. 
I’m wasn’t intending to be condescending in my initial response but those points are often things that aren’t thought about when “most” people reference any of their DD.

 I don’t have time but will agree that you’ve done the research and it’s appreciated. 
I’m wasn’t intending to be condescending in my initial response but those points are often things that aren’t thought about when “most” people reference any of their DD.