SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1

BlackBerry Ltd. engages in the provision of intelligent security software and services. It operates through the following segments: QNX, Secure Communications, and Licensing. The QNX segment includes development of safe and reliable software for embedded systems across technology-driven industries. The Secure Communications segment delivers operational resiliency with a government-grade portfolio of secure, certified solutions for mobile fortification, critical communications and crisis management. The Licensing segment focuses on management and monetization of the firm's global patent portfolio. The company was founded by Michael Lazaridis, James Laurence Balsillie, and Douglas E. Fregin on March 7, 1984 and is headquartered in Waterloo, Canada.

BlackBerry Ltd

BlackBerry is seeing strong upward momentum as investors pivot toward its QNX division's role in the growing physical AI and robotics sectors, with community sentiment fueled by bullish sentiment regarding new federal certifications and institutional buying. The stock is currently trending on the back of massive volume and excitement surrounding upcoming robotics conference presentations, as shareholders express high conviction in the company's long-term software pivot.

Zscaler, Inc. engages in the provision of a cloud-based internet security platform. It offers Zero Trust Exchange, Zscaler Client Connector, Zscaler Internet Access, Zscaler Private Access, Zscaler B2B, Zscaler Cloud Protection, and Zscaler Digital Experience. The company was founded by Jagtar Singh Chaudhry and K. Kailash in September 2007 and is headquartered in San Jose, CA.

Zscaler Inc

Zscaler stock is experiencing a sharp sell-off following a guidance update that revealed a projected deceleration in revenue growth, overshadowing a solid earnings beat. Community sentiment is deeply divided as investors debate whether the 30% drop is a major buying opportunity for a long-term AI cybersecurity leader or a structural reassessment of the company's growth trajectory and sales execution.

Marvell Technology, Inc. engages in the design, development, and sale of integrated circuits. Its products include data processing units, security solutions, automotive, coherent DSP, DCI optical modules, ethernet controllers, ethernet PHYs, ethernet switches, linear driver, PAM DSP, transimpedance amplifiers, fibre channel, HDD, SSD controller, storage accelerators, ASIC, and Marvell government solutions. It operates through the following geographical segments: United States, Singapore, Israel, India, China, and Others. The company was founded by Wei Li Dai and Pantas Sutardja in 1995 and is headquartered in Wilmington, DE.

Marvell Technology Inc

Marvell Technology is experiencing heightened investor interest and upward momentum driven by strong institutional backing and a major stake acquisition by AMD, highlighting its critical role in AI infrastructure. The community is actively debating the stock's valuation, weighing its rapid ascent against potential long-term benefits of the AI networking and custom silicon buildout as earnings approach.

Salesforce, Inc. engages in the design and development of cloud-based enterprise software for customer relationship management. Its solutions include sales force automation, customer service and support, marketing automation, digital commerce, community management, collaboration, industry-specific solutions, and salesforce platform. The firm also provides guidance, support, training, and advisory services. The company was founded by Marc Russell Benioff and Parker Harris in 1999 and is headquartered in San Francisco, CA.

Salesforce Inc

Salesforce is trending as the community scrutinizes the enterprise software sector's resilience against AI, with traders heavily debating whether recent stock weakness offers a deep-value buying opportunity or a signal of broader structural decline. Investors are fixated on the upcoming earnings report as a critical 'redemption test' that could trigger a sector-wide rotation back into software if management proves that their AI agents and enterprise workflows are delivering tangible growth.

IonQ, Inc. develops and manufactures quantum computers. The firm specializes in quantum computing and quantum information processing. The company was founded by Christopher Monroe and Jung Sang Kim in 2015 and is headquartered in College Park, MD.

IonQ Inc

IonQ is trending due to significant sector-wide momentum sparked by government investment in quantum infrastructure, though the companys omission from direct federal funding has sparked intense debate among traders. The community is actively split between bulls anticipating a potential short squeeze fueled by high short interest and skeptics questioning the stock's valuation relative to its peers.

Digital Turbine, Inc. is a mobile growth platform that offers solutions for advertisers, publishers, carriers, and device original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). The firm operates through the On Device Solutions (ODS) and App Growth Platform (AGP) segments. The ODS segment generates revenue from the delivery of mobile application media or content to end users with solutions for all participants in the mobile application ecosystem that want to connect with end users and consumers who hold the device. This includes mobile carriers and device OEMs that participate in the app economy, app publishers and developers, and brands and advertising agencies. The AGP segment provides platforms that allow mobile app publishers and developers to monetize their monthly active users via display, native, and video advertising. The company was founded on November 6, 1998 and is headquartered in Austin, TX.

Digital Turbine Inc

Digital Turbine is experiencing significant market interest following a string of bullish partnerships, including a deepened integration with Google Cloud and a strategic deal with Orange to scale mobile app distribution. The community is actively debating a potential re-rating of the stock as investors look to upcoming earnings for confirmation that these catalysts are driving a genuine financial turnaround.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. engages in building a broadband cellular network in space to operate directly with standard, unmodified mobile devices based on an extensive IP and patent portfolio. It focuses on providing mobile broadband services with global coverage to all end-users, without the need to purchase special equipment. The company was founded by Abel Avellan on May 31, 2017 and is headquartered in Midland, TX.

AST SpaceMobile Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class A

AST SpaceMobile Inc

AST SpaceMobile is seeing significant momentum as investors anticipate upcoming satellite launches and react to Europes push to favor regional satellite operators over competitors. The community remains highly active, debating the stock's long-term valuation versus its rapid price appreciation, with heavy institutional buying fueling speculation of a potential short squeeze.

Momentus, Inc. engages in the provision of in-space infrastructure services. It offers space transportation and in-orbit servicing. The company was founded by Mikhail Kokorich in 2017 and is headquartered in Santa Jose, CA.

Momentus Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class A

Momentus Inc. is trending as investors aggressively trade the stock on high volume, fueled by intense speculation regarding its potential exposure to the upcoming SpaceX IPO. While some in the community are rallying behind its aerospace initiatives and defense contracts, others remain highly skeptical due to the company's historical financial performance and the volatility associated with its recent capital-raising announcements.

Groupon, Inc. engages in the global scaled two-sided marketplace that connects consumers to merchants. It operates through the North America and International geographical segments. The company was founded by Andrew D. Mason, Eric Paul Lefkofsky, and Bradley A. Keywell in October 2008 and is headquartered in Chicago, IL.

Groupon Inc

Groupon is experiencing heightened social media buzz and volatility as market participants track a significant short interest setup, with community members actively discussing a potential short squeeze fueled by low float availability and substantial call option volume. Traders are highlighting the company's recent restructuring and AI-native pivot as fundamental catalysts that, when combined with technical indicators like moving average crossovers, are drawing increased interest from momentum capital.

Boston Scientific Corp. engages in the development, manufacture, and marketing of medical devices that are used in interventional medical procedures. It operates through the MedSurg and Cardiovascular segments. The MedSurg segment includes Endoscopy, Urology, and Neuromodulation. The Cardiovascular segment consists of Cardiology and Peripheral Interventions. The company was founded by John E. Abele and Pete Michael Nicholas on June 29, 1979 and is headquartered in Marlborough, MA.

Boston Scientific Corp.

Boston Scientific stock is facing significant downward pressure as investors react to a downward revision in full-year guidance and concerns over competitive dynamics within the electrophysiology sector. While some market participants are calling the steep pullback an overreaction and eyeing entry points, community discourse remains split between those positioning for a long-term rebound and others bracing for further volatility following the guidance cut.

statis crypto Watchlist

Bitcoin

Ethereum

Solana

Ripple

Dogecoin

Cardano

statis IN Watchlist

Nifty 50

Nifty Bank

Reliance Industries Ltd.

Zomato Ltd.

Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Motors Ltd.

HDFC Bank Ltd.

ITC Ltd.

Adani Enterprises Ltd

Axis Bank Ltd

Bajaj Finance Ltd

statis US Watchlist

SPDR S&P 500 ETF

Apple Inc.

Tesla Inc

Microsoft Corporation

NVIDIA Corp

 Hey, I want to invite you to join Stocktwits. It’s the largest global community of active traders. You’ll get access to the real-time market insights, news, discussion and much more! You can sign up using my unique link below 
 


 has invited you to join Stocktwits

$NLST IMO, institution of 087/731 petitions merely back loaded the patents in context of PTAB, instead of front loading validity in litigation. 
   
They&#39;re essentially irrelevant for all intents and purposes, with no effect/implications unless and until a PTAB FWD of unpatentability is affirmed by CAFC, which takes years, while timing considerations/race to finality in play. 
   
Meanwhile, ITC does their own validity assessment and hopefully awards relief, then the 087/731 Samsung TX case resumes with ITC ruling carrying some weight in Dist Crt, where we always win on validity and infringement.  And if there&#39;s appeal of ITC, we either win the race at CAFC or reconcile together should there be a PTAB FWD of unpatentability. 
   
In all regards, with so many cases and patents already at CAFC, which will likely decide our fate (at least direction given remands/etc), and with the ITC, as well as stayed TX cases which should resume after CAFC appeals, the 731/087 IPR/PGR aren&#39;t really in the picture.

Ronald Zinner

John

Salt_Kang

Bowlsketball

Gringo!

Lowell Juno

Kevin Krieger

Extreme hyper

Niels

Gilles Gasparoni

Dave Franzen

Stephen Riedlinger

Cameron

Dont show my name

Reiner Pöhlmann

atomicmozart

Rick B.

Rezaul hashem

Numbers Pro

jeff

Redbull2982

Dallas

Larry Love

Gina Kowal

ratatouille420

Paul

Robert Hunter

D. van Gogh

StockTwits Web

Netlist Inc

 IMO, institution of 087/731 petitions merely back loaded the patents in context of PTAB, instead of front loading validity in litigation. 
   
They're essentially irrelevant for all intents and purposes, with no effect/implications unless and until a PTAB FWD of unpatentability is affirmed by CAFC, which takes years, while timing considerations/race to finality in play. 
   
Meanwhile, ITC does their own validity assessment and hopefully awards relief, then the 087/731 Samsung TX case resumes with ITC ruling carrying some weight in Dist Crt, where we always win on validity and infringement.  And if there's appeal of ITC, we either win the race at CAFC or reconcile together should there be a PTAB FWD of unpatentability. 
   
In all regards, with so many cases and patents already at CAFC, which will likely decide our fate (at least direction given remands/etc), and with the ITC, as well as stayed TX cases which should resume after CAFC appeals, the 731/087 IPR/PGR aren't really in the picture.