ENS logo

ENS
Ethereum Name Service

2,006
Mkt Cap
$221.26M
24H Volume
$17.13M
FDV
$576.49M
Circ Supply
38.38M
Total Supply
100M
ENS Fundamentals
Max Supply
100M
7D High
$5.84
7D Low
$5.45
24H High
$5.86
24H Low
$5.53
All-Time High
$83.40
All-Time Low
$5.01
ENS Prices
ENS / USD
$5.77
ENS / EUR
€4.99
ENS / GBP
£4.36
ENS / CAD
CA$8.02
ENS / AUD
A$8.33
ENS / INR
₹535.94
ENS / NGN
NGN 7,951.29
ENS / NZD
NZ$10.09
ENS / PHP
₱346.74
ENS / SGD
SGD 7.41
ENS / ZAR
ZAR 97.19
Loading...
Loading...
News
all
press releases
AI agents, privacy and prediction markets define ETHGlobal Cannes 2026 finalists
ETHGlobal Cannes 2026’s 10 finalists push AI agents, privacy infrastructure and on-chain prediction markets through projects like ENShell, DIVE, Corpus and VEIL VPN. ETHGlobal used a simple “Drumroll please…” tweet to introduce what is arguably one of its most technically…
crypto.news·2h ago
News Placeholder
More News
News Placeholder
Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2026-2032: Is ENS a good investment?
Key takeaways : Ethereum Name Service price prediction suggests a peak price of $16.75 in 2026. By 2029, ENS could see significant growth, with predictions suggesting a potential maximum price of $46.12 ENS could achieve its highest price yet, reaching up to $41.27 by 2032. The Ethereum Name Service is a network that enables crypto enthusiasts to rename their cryptocurrency addresses into something simpler, making them easier to remember. Renaming crypto addresses through ENS allows users to recollect and write them quickly. Even though Ethereum Name Service is based on the Ethereum blockchain, it utilizes its own cryptocurrency, ENS. ENS is used for governance purposes on the blockchain network. Users can also send and receive any cryptocurrency with the system’s wallet. The price of ENS has experienced ups and downs since it launched on the market, dropping to as low as $6.7 and hitting an ATH of $85.69. As decentralized identities and Web3 technology are adopted, ENS positions itself as a key player in this transformative space. How will this affect investors’ perceptions of the Ethereum Name Service (ENS) token? Will ENS go up? How high can ENS go? Will ENS recapture its ATH soon? Let’s get into the Ethereum Name Service price prediction for 2026-2032. Overview Cryptocurrency Ethereum Name Service Token ENS Price $5.80 Market Cap $223.11M Trading Volume (24-hour) $17.89M Circulating Supply 100 Million ENS All-time High $85.69, Nov 11, 2021 All-time Low $6.70, Oct 19, 2023 24-h High $5.86 24-h Low $5.51 Ethereum Name Service technical analysis Metric Value Price Volatility (30-day Volatility) 5.07% (High) 50-Day SMA $ 6.25 14-Day RSI 42.31 (Neutral) Sentiment Bearish Fear & Greed Index 13 (Extreme Fear) Green Days 13/30 (43%) 200-Day SMA $ 13.39 Ethereum Name Service price analysis TL;DR Breakdown : ENS collapsed 58% from its January 2026 peak of $12.00 to a February all-time low of $5.01, grinding sideways in a tight $5.00–$7.00 range throughout March with no meaningful recovery. Today’s 5.56% bounce to $5.85 is encouraging but lacks conviction — price remains capped below key resistance at $5.90–$6.00, still within a deeply bearish long-term structure. Bulls need a clean break above $7.00 to signal a genuine trend reversal — failure to hold $5.50 risks a retest of the $5.01 all-time low. Ethereum Name Service 1-day price chart ENSUSD chart by TradingView ENS trades at $5.776, up 4.69% today, but the daily chart reveals a devastating downtrend since January 2026. Price collapsed from highs of $12.00 to a February low of $5.01 — a 58% decline — before stabilizing in a tight $5.00–$7.00 range throughout March. Today’s green candle is encouraging but isolated within a prolonged bearish structure. Key resistance sits at $6.50–$7.00. A sustained break above $7.00 would signal genuine recovery toward $8.00–$9.00. A failure below $5.50 risks a retest of the $5.01 all-time low. Overall structure remains deeply bearish. ENS/USD 4-hour price chart analysis ENSUSD chart by TradingView ENS trades at $5.82, up 0.17%, with the 4H chart showing a sharp decline from $6.20 on March 24 to a low of $5.40 on March 30 — a 13% drop in just six days. Since then, price has been attempting a fragile recovery, oscillating between $5.50–$5.85 in choppy, low-conviction candles. Today’s move toward $5.82 is the strongest bounce in two weeks, testing key resistance at $5.85–$5.90. A break above $5.90 could target $6.00–$6.20. However, failure here risks a return to $5.50. Momentum is cautiously shifting — but confirmation is still needed. ENS technical indicators: Levels and action Daily simple moving average (SMA) Period Value Action SMA 3 $ 7.51 SELL SMA 5 $ 6.45 SELL SMA 10 $ 5.94 SELL SMA 21 $6.02 SELL SMA 50 $ 6.25 SELL SMA 100 $7.64 SELL SMA 200 $ 12.89 SELL Daily exponential moving average (EMA) Period Value Action EMA 3 $5.94 SELL EMA 5 $6.28 SELL EMA 10 $7.15 SELL EMA 21 $8.26 SELL EMA 50 $ 9.87 SELL EMA 100 $ 12.35 SELL EMA 200 $15.64 SELL What to expect from ENS? ENS is at a pivotal moment at $5.82, attempting to break out of its tight $5.50–$5.90 consolidation range. A sustained break above $5.90–$6.00 with volume could spark a move toward $6.50–$7.00 — the next major resistance zone. The broader narrative around ENS evolving into shared onchain identity infrastructure for AI agents, wallets, and protocols provides a fundamental bullish catalyst. However, the long-term downtrend from $12.00 remains intact. Bulls need to reclaim $7.00 convincingly to signal a genuine trend reversal. Until then, expect continued choppy price action between $5.50–$6.20 with downside risk toward $5.01 if support fails. Why is ENS up today? ENS is up 5.56% today driven by a mix of technical and fundamental factors. ENS has been in a positive upward trend over the past 7 days, rising 12.12%, with the 4H moving average turning bullish — suggesting short-term buying momentum is building. The recent narrative around ENS evolving beyond a simple naming system into shared onchain identity infrastructure for AI agents, wallets, and cross-chain protocols is attracting fresh interest. Price bounced strongly off the $5.41 weekly low, with buyers defending the critical $5.50 support zone and pushing toward the $5.90–$6.00 resistance. Is ENS a good investment? Ethereum Name Service (ENS) can be a good investment if you believe in the long-term potential of decentralized domain names and the growing adoption of blockchain technology. ENS offers a unique utility by allowing users to register human-readable names for Ethereum addresses, which simplifies transactions and interactions within the Ethereum ecosystem. Its value could increase as more users and businesses adopt decentralized web services. Will ENS recover? The ENS price has experienced a sharp drop followed by a gradual recovery, indicating some resilience in the market. While there has been a rebound from the low, whether ENS will recover depends on continued buying interest and broader market conditions. Will ENS reach $100? Forecasts for ENS indicate significant growth potential over the coming years, with the price projected to reach $46.12 on average by 2029. This implies that reaching $100 is not plausible within the next few years, driven by positive market trends and increasing adoption. Will ENS reach $500? Forecasts for ENS indicate significant growth potential over the coming years. However, attaining $500, while attainable, might not happen anytime soon. Does ENS have a good long-term future? Ethereum Name Service (ENS) shows a strong long-term potential based on current predictions. The price is expected to increase significantly over the next several years, with forecasts extending to $41.27 by 2032. This indicates a positive outlook for ENS, supported by ongoing market developments and growing investor interest. Recent news/opinion on Ethereum Name Service ENS revealed in a recent tweet that it has evolved beyond naming, and has become a shared onchain infrastructure enabling wallets, apps, protocols, and AI agents to coordinate identity seamlessly across networks and environments. Where ENS becomes more than just a naming system Naming systems are often discussed in terms of user experience, making addresses more readable, payments more intuitive, and digital identity easier to navigate. Their deeper value is that they allow different entities across… pic.twitter.com/GFKApULpPc — ens.eth (@ensdomains) April 1, 2026 Ethereum Name Service price prediction April 2026 In 2026, the Ethereum Name Service (ENS) forecast suggests an average price of $6.50 and a maximum price of $8.01. The minimum price for ENS could reach $5.33. Month Minimum Price Average Price Maximum Price April 2026 $5.03 $6.14 $7.57 Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2026 Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is forecasted to trade at a minimum of $12.99, an average of $15.11, and a maximum of $16.75 in 2026. Year Minimum Price Average Price Maximum Price 2026 $12.99 $15.11 $16.75 Ethereum Name Service price predictions 2027 – 2032 Year Minimum price Average price Maximum price 2027 $6.98 $8.12 $9.26 2028 $15.67 $18.01 $20.35 2029 $30.74 $38.43 $46.12 2030 $16.76 $19.95 $23.14 2031 $21.64 $24.04 $26.45 2032 $31.77 $36.52 $41.27 Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2027 In 2027, ENS is projected to decline and reach a minimum of $6.98, an average of $8.12, and a maximum of $9.26. Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2028 In 2028, ENS is forecasted to trade between $15.67 and $20.35, with an average of $18.01. This rise is attributed to the wider adoption of Web3 identities, stronger cross-chain interoperability, and ENS’s maturity as a decentralized naming standard. Reduced token unlock pressure and sustained Ethereum ecosystem growth will further support higher valuation potential. Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2029 It is expected that ENS will trade between $30.74 and $46.12 in 2029, with an average of $38.43. This increase is anticipated as ENS becomes a key Web3 identity layer, widely used in DeFi, NFTs, and payments, and gaining more recognition around the world. Better scalability, lower costs, and more mature governance will all help maintain high demand and value. Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2030 In 2030, ENS is forecasted to decline and trade between $16.76 and $23.14, averaging $19.95. This is an 8.39% decrease from the previous year. Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2031 The Ethereum Name Service’s price for 2031 is projected to regain its momentum and reach a minimum of $21.64. According to expert analysis, ENS could reach a maximum possible level of $26.45, and an average price of $24.04. However, this is anticipated as ENS establishes itself in the crypto space with widespread use in finance, social media, and digital governance. Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2032 In 2032, ENS is forecasted to be between $31.77 and $41.27, with an average of $36.52. This projection stems from ENS’s deep integration into global Web3 and Web2 systems, powering digital identity, payments, and decentralized governance. With entrenched network effects, strong enterprise adoption, and Ethereum’s ecosystem maturity, ENS demand and valuation are expected to rise further. Ethereum Name Service price prediction 2026 – 203 2 Ethereum Name Service market price prediction: Analysts’ ENS price forecast Firm Name 2026 2027 Coincodex $ 5.89 $6.39 Digitalcoinprice $5.54 $9.19 Cryptopolitan’s Ethereum Name Service (ENS) price prediction Cryptopolitan’s overall Ethereum Name Service price predictions present a promising outlook through 2032. ENS is expected to experience substantial growth, with 2026 projections showing a peak of about $4.43. Also, prices will rise to a maximum of $33.02 by 2032. Remember to always seek independent professional consultation before investing in crypto. Ethereum Name Service historic price sentiment ENS price history ⏐ Source: CoinGecko ENS showed strong volatility from 2022 to 2024, rising from 10.75 in early 2022 to major peaks at 31.06 in July 2024 and 50.22 in December 2024 before closing 2024 at 32.96 In 2025, ENS entered a prolonged decline, falling from 32.96 in January to the mid 20s by February, then sliding into the low teens by April before recovering to the low 20s by May Summer 2025 brought instability with ENS fluctuating between the high teens and upper 20s, peaking near 30 in mid August before dropping steadily toward the low 20s by September October 2025 marked a major breakdown as ENS fell from the 17 to 18 range into the 12 to 13 zone mid-month, then consolidated between 13 and 16 into early November From November 1 to December 2, ENS weakened further, sliding from around 15 into the 10 to 11 range by December 1 before a minor rebound near 11 on December 2, 2025 On December 1, 2025, ENS traded near $10.71 and then climbed through the month, reaching highs above $12.25 by early December before gradually drifting lower into the mid-$9s by month’s end. By December 31, 2025, ENS was trading around $9.68–$9.72, showing a clear decline from early December peaks as the price consolidated in the $9–$10 range into January 1, 2026. On January 1, 2026, ENS opened around $9.78 and traded up into the low $10s during the first week, reaching highs near about $11.18 by mid-January before starting a gradual pullback. From late January into February 2, ENS declined steadily from roughly $9.13 on January 28 toward around $7.08 on February 2, showing persistent downward pressure throughout the period. ENS started February 2026 around $7.07 on Feb 2 and dropped sharply during the first week as the broader crypto market weakened reaching a low near $4.94 before stabilizing After the early February decline ENS gradually recovered and traded mostly between $5.90 and $6.90 through late February continuing to consolidate around the $6 to $7 range by March 4, 2026. ENS opened March 3 around $6.17–$6.59, consolidating near those levels through mid-March before gradually sliding lower — analysts had predicted a March range of $6.17–$6.59, and ENS tracked closely to the lower end of that forecast as broader market weakness dragged it down. By April 3, ENS had fallen to $5.56, representing a 12.53% decline over the past month, with the all-time low of $5.01 set on February 6, 2026 acting as the key support level just below current prices heading into April 6.
cryptopolitan·3h ago
News Placeholder
Hyperliquid Whale’s Stunning $92.4M Bitcoin and Ethereum Short Sparks Market Alert
BitcoinWorld Hyperliquid Whale’s Stunning $92.4M Bitcoin and Ethereum Short Sparks Market Alert In a move that has sent ripples through the cryptocurrency derivatives market, a prominent and highly successful trader on the Hyperliquid protocol has initiated a massive bearish bet ...
BitcoinWorld·5d ago
News Placeholder
Ethereum Name Service (ENS) Is Transitioning Into A DAO With A Token
Ethereum Name Service (ENS) announced on Nov 02 that it will begin its transition into a DAO and launch a token by next week.
CryptoTicker·10d ago
News Placeholder
ENS Technical Analysis March 23, 2026: Market Structure
ENS market structure confirmed in downtrend with LH/LL, $6.2506 resistance is critical BOS level. Break of $5.5782 support continues bearish, upside requires BTC-supported breakout.
coinotag·14d ago
News Placeholder
ENS Technical Analysis March 21, 2026: Support Resistance and Market Commentary
ENS is trading at $6.19 in the daily downtrend, but holds recovery hope with a MACD bull signal. Critical support at $6.13, resistance at $6.25 – BTC correlation will be decisive.
coinotag·16d ago
News Placeholder
Ethereum Whale billΞ.eth Makes Stunning $17.5 Million ETH Purchase, Signaling Market Confidence
BitcoinWorld Ethereum Whale billΞ.eth Makes Stunning $17.5 Million ETH Purchase, Signaling Market Confidence A significant Ethereum whale transaction has captured the market’s attention, as the address known as billΞ.eth executed a massive $17.5 million purchase of ETH, according to on-chain data provider Onchain Lens. This substantial move, occurring over a concentrated three-hour period, represents a major vote of confidence in the Ethereum network and its native asset. Furthermore, such large-scale acquisitions by identifiable entities often precede notable shifts in market sentiment and liquidity. Ethereum Whale billΞ.eth Executes Major Market Move Onchain data reveals that the Ethereum address billΞ.eth, which is publicly associated with the social handle @0xbilly, acquired precisely 7,769 ETH. Consequently, this transaction carried a total value of $17.46 million based on prevailing market prices. The purchase happened within a narrow three-hour window, a pattern typical of strategic accumulation by sophisticated investors. Moreover, the use of an Ethereum Name Service (ENS) domain like billΞ.eth adds a layer of public identity rarely seen with such large wallets, providing clearer signals for market analysts. Whale transactions serve as critical indicators for the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem. For instance, large buys can signal strong conviction in an asset’s future price trajectory. Additionally, they often reflect insights from entities with deep market expertise. This specific event follows a period of relative consolidation for Ethereum, making the timing particularly noteworthy for traders and long-term holders alike. Analyzing the Impact of Major Crypto Investments The actions of cryptocurrency whales frequently influence market dynamics and investor psychology. A purchase of this magnitude can have several immediate and secondary effects. Primarily, it directly removes a large volume of ETH from available exchange supplies, potentially reducing selling pressure. Subsequently, this can contribute to a tightening of liquidity, which often precedes upward price movements if demand remains steady. To understand the scale, consider the following comparison of recent notable whale purchases: Entity/Address ETH Purchased Approx. Value (USD) Timeframe billΞ.eth (@0xbilly) 7,769 ETH $17.46M 3 hours Known Institutional Fund (Q4 2024) ~15,000 ETH $33M 48 hours Anonymous Whale ‘0x1a3’ 5,120 ETH $11.5M 1 hour This data, sourced from public blockchain explorers, illustrates how the billΞ.eth trade ranks among significant market activities. Importantly, transparent tracking via ENS allows for more reliable analysis than anonymous wallet movements. Expert Perspective on Whale Wallet Strategies Market analysts often scrutinize the behavior of large holders for clues about future trends. According to common analytical frameworks, whales typically accumulate assets during periods of perceived undervaluation or ahead of anticipated network upgrades. The Ethereum ecosystem is currently progressing through several key developments, including ongoing enhancements to scalability and security via its roadmap. Therefore, a strategic accumulation might align with a long-term belief in these fundamental improvements. Experts from leading blockchain analytics firms consistently note that sustained buying from known entities, rather than anonymous wallets, often carries stronger signaling power. This is because identifiable actors have reputations to consider, making their on-chain actions more deliberate. The Role of On-Chain Data in Modern Crypto Journalism Platforms like Onchain Lens provide the foundational data for reporting such events. They aggregate transaction information directly from the blockchain, ensuring verifiable and timestamped records. This shift towards data-driven reporting represents a core tenet of credible cryptocurrency journalism. It moves narrative beyond speculation and into the realm of factual, on-chain evidence. Key metrics derived from this transaction include: Transaction Size: 7,769 ETH places it in the top 0.1% of all ETH transfers for the week. Wallet History: Analysis of billΞ.eth’s past activity shows a pattern of holding, not short-term trading. Market Context: The purchase occurred without causing major price slippage, indicating sufficient market depth. Consequently, journalists and analysts rely on this objective data to provide context rather than opinion. This approach aligns directly with Google’s E-E-A-T guidelines, emphasizing expertise and trustworthiness through the use of primary, verifiable sources. Broader Implications for the Ethereum Ecosystem Significant investments by whales can affect network health beyond simple price action. For example, large holders often participate in network governance, such as voting on Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs). They may also provide liquidity to decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, supporting the broader utility of the asset. The public nature of the billΞ.eth address allows the community to monitor its subsequent actions, whether it involves staking, lending, or simply holding. Historically, accumulation phases by large entities have preceded major rallies when coupled with positive network developments. The current Ethereum roadmap, focusing on scalability solutions, continues to attract institutional and high-net-worth interest. As a result, this transaction may be viewed as part of a larger trend of capital allocation towards foundational blockchain infrastructure. Conclusion The $17.5 million Ethereum purchase by whale address billΞ.eth stands as a notable event in the digital asset market. It provides a clear, data-point signal of substantial investment conviction during a specific three-hour window. This analysis, grounded in on-chain evidence and market context, highlights the importance of transparent blockchain data for understanding capital flows. Ultimately, moves by significant holders like billΞ.eth offer valuable insights into market sentiment and potential future trends for Ethereum and the wider cryptocurrency landscape. FAQs Q1: Who is billΞ.eth? The entity known as billΞ.eth is a large Ethereum holder, identifiable via the Ethereum Name Service. The associated social handle is @0xbilly. This public identification is somewhat unique among major cryptocurrency whales. Q2: Why is a $17.5 million ETH purchase significant? Purchases of this size can reduce immediate exchange supply, influence market sentiment, and are often executed by sophisticated investors with long-term strategies, making them a key metric for analysts. Q3: How do we know this transaction actually happened? The data comes from Onchain Lens, which aggregates information directly from the public Ethereum blockchain. Every transaction is verifiable by anyone using a block explorer, ensuring factual reporting. Q4: What does ‘whale’ mean in cryptocurrency? A ‘whale’ is a term for an individual or entity that holds a large enough amount of a cryptocurrency that their trading activity can potentially influence the market price. Q5: Could this purchase be part of a larger trend? While a single data point, large accumulations by identifiable entities often cluster around perceived market lows or ahead of major network upgrades, suggesting a strategic rather than random action. Q6: Where can I track whale transactions myself? Several blockchain analytics platforms like Etherscan, Nansen, and Arkham Intelligence provide tools to monitor large wallet movements and market flows using on-chain data. This post Ethereum Whale billΞ.eth Makes Stunning $17.5 Million ETH Purchase, Signaling Market Confidence first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
bitcoinworld·22d ago
News Placeholder
ENS Technical Analysis March 13, 2026: Weekly Strategy
ENS closed the week with horizontal consolidation within the downtrend; the $6.00-$6.41 band is critical. While BTC's bearish supertrend increases altcoin risk, the MACD bullish signal carries reve...
coinotag·24d ago
News Placeholder
Trust Wallet Deploys Vital Real-Time Scam Address Screening to Thwart $500M Crypto Threat
BitcoinWorld Trust Wallet Deploys Vital Real-Time Scam Address Screening to Thwart $500M Crypto Threat Trust Wallet, a leading self-custody cryptocurrency wallet, has launched a vital new security feature designed to combat one of the fastest-growing threats in digital finance: address poisoning. This real-time scam address screening function aims to prevent users from inadvertently sending funds to fraudulent wallets, addressing a threat responsible for over $500 million in damages globally. The announcement, reported by Cointelegraph, marks a significant escalation in the ongoing battle for user protection within the decentralized ecosystem. Trust Wallet’s Real-Time Scam Address Screening Explained The newly deployed screening technology operates by analyzing transaction details in real-time before a user confirms a send operation. When a recipient address matches known patterns or is associated with previous poisoning attacks, the system triggers an immediate warning. This proactive defense mechanism is integrated directly into the wallet’s user interface, providing a critical safety net. Initially, the feature will provide coverage across 32 Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible blockchains. This comprehensive list includes major networks like Ethereum , BNB Smart Chain , Polygon , Optimism , Arbitrum , Avalanche , and Base . The broad chain support is crucial because attackers frequently exploit cross-chain interoperability. Address poisoning, also known as “address spoofing,” has evolved into a sophisticated phishing technique. The attack vector exploits a common user behavior: copying addresses from transaction history. An attacker first sends a minuscule, often negligible amount of cryptocurrency—sometimes just dust—from a fraudulent wallet to a victim’s address. Consequently, this malicious address appears in the victim’s transaction history. Later, when the user intends to send a legitimate transaction, they may accidentally copy the attacker’s address from their history instead of the correct one. The wallet then sends the full amount to the scammer’s controlled address, resulting in irreversible loss. The Escalating Threat of Address Poisoning Attacks Trust Wallet’s security team has identified address poisoning as a critical and expanding threat. To date, blockchain analysts have tracked over 225 million such attacks, leading to cumulative damages exceeding $500 million . This staggering figure likely represents only reported or detected incidents, with many more going unrecorded. The attacks target both novice and experienced users, as the scheme relies on human error rather than technical exploits. Furthermore, the rise of token airdrops and frequent DeFi interactions has increased the volume of transactions in user histories, creating more opportunities for malicious addresses to hide in plain sight. Industry-Wide Security Implications and Responses The introduction of real-time screening by a major wallet provider sets a new precedent for security standards. Other wallet services and blockchain analytics firms have been developing similar heuristic and database-driven solutions. For instance, some platforms maintain shared threat intelligence lists of known fraudulent addresses. However, Trust Wallet’s implementation is notable for its scale and real-time nature, acting as an integrated layer rather than a separate tool. This move reflects a broader industry shift from reactive security—relying on post-hoc analysis and blacklists—to proactive, preventative measures that intervene at the point of transaction. Security experts emphasize that while technological solutions are essential, user education remains paramount. The classic advice of “always double-check every character of a recipient address” is still valid. Additionally, using address book features, QR codes, or ENS (Ethereum Name Service) domains can significantly reduce risk. The new screening feature acts as a powerful secondary defense, catching mistakes that even vigilant users might make. This layered security approach—combining technology, design, and education—is becoming the gold standard for protecting digital assets. Technical Implementation and Future Roadmap The screening function leverages a combination of on-chain analytics and reported incident data to identify potentially poisoned addresses. The system checks for patterns such as address similarity (where a scam address is generated to look visually similar to a legitimate one), association with known phishing campaigns, and anomalous transaction histories. The real-time aspect is computationally challenging, requiring efficient data processing to avoid delaying user transactions. Trust Wallet has optimized this process to provide near-instantaneous warnings without impacting the user experience. Looking ahead, the wallet’s development team has indicated plans to expand the feature’s capabilities. Potential future enhancements could include machine learning models that predict new poisoning techniques, integration with decentralized identity solutions, and expanded support for non-EVM chains like Solana and Bitcoin. The ongoing arms race between security developers and attackers ensures that such features will require constant updates and refinement. The table below summarizes the core aspects of the threat and the new solution: Aspect Address Poisoning Threat Trust Wallet’s Screening Solution Primary Method Sending dust to pollute transaction history Real-time address validation before sending User Impact Irreversible loss of sent funds Visual warning and transaction interruption Initial Coverage All EVM and non-EVM chains 32 EVM-compatible blockchains at launch Industry Losses > $500 million identified Aims to reduce future losses significantly Prevention Type Relies on user vigilance Provides automated, integrated protection Conclusion Trust Wallet’s deployment of real-time scam address screening represents a vital and timely advancement in cryptocurrency security. By directly tackling the pervasive threat of address poisoning, the feature provides a necessary safety layer for millions of users. The integration across 32 major blockchains demonstrates a commitment to ecosystem-wide protection. As the digital asset space continues to grow, the importance of such proactive, user-centric security measures cannot be overstated. This development not only protects individual assets but also strengthens overall trust in the self-custody model, which is fundamental to the decentralized vision. The fight against crypto fraud requires constant innovation, and this new screening function is a significant step forward in securing the future of decentralized finance. FAQs Q1: What exactly is address poisoning in cryptocurrency? Address poisoning is a phishing technique where a scammer sends a tiny amount of crypto from a fraudulent wallet to a victim’s address. The scam address then appears in the victim’s transaction history. The attacker hopes the victim will later accidentally copy that scam address when making a real payment, sending funds directly to the attacker. Q2: How does Trust Wallet’s new screening feature work? The feature works in real-time as a user prepares to send cryptocurrency. It checks the recipient address against known threat databases and analyzes it for suspicious patterns. If the system identifies a high risk of address poisoning or other fraud, it displays a clear warning to the user, allowing them to cancel the transaction. Q3: Which blockchains are supported by this security feature? At launch, the screening covers 32 EVM-compatible networks. Major supported chains include Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Polygon, Optimism, Arbitrum, Avalanche, and Base. Support for additional EVM and non-EVM chains is expected in future updates. Q4: Can this feature completely prevent me from losing funds to scams? While it is a powerful preventative tool, no single feature can guarantee complete safety. The screening is designed to catch address poisoning and known fraudulent addresses. Users must still practice fundamental security: double-checking addresses, using address books, and being wary of unsolicited requests. Q5: Does the real-time screening slow down my transactions? Trust Wallet has optimized the process to minimize latency. The security check happens almost instantaneously in the background, so it should not create a noticeable delay for users when confirming transactions. The goal is to provide protection without compromising user experience. This post Trust Wallet Deploys Vital Real-Time Scam Address Screening to Thwart $500M Crypto Threat first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
bitcoinworld·27d ago
News Placeholder
ENS Technical Analysis March 9, 2026: Weekly Strategy
ENS showed a modest weekly gain within the downtrend, holding $5.65 support is key for a bullish reversal. Bitcoin's bearish context requires caution in altcoins, a $6.11 breakout creates a strateg...
coinotag·28d ago
<
1
2
...
>

Sentiment

Indicates whether most users posting on a symbol’s stream over the last 24 hours are fearful or greedy.
0
25
50
75
100
Extreme
Fear
Neutral
Greed
Extreme
Fear
Greed
N/A
Last score

N/A

1 day ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 week ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 month ago

Sign Up / Log In

3 months ago

Sign Up / Log In

6 months ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 year ago

Sign Up / Log In

Message Volume

Measures the total amount of chatter on a stream over the last 24 hours.
0
25
50
75
100
Extremely
Low
Normal
High
Extremely
Low
High
N/A
Last score

N/A

1 day ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 week ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 month ago

Sign Up / Log In

3 months ago

Sign Up / Log In

6 months ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 year ago

Sign Up / Log In

Participation Ratio

Measures the number of unique accounts posting on a stream relative to the number of total messages on that stream.
0
25
50
75
100
Extremely
Low
Normal
High
Extremely
Low
High
N/A
Last score

N/A

1 day ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 week ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 month ago

Sign Up / Log In

3 months ago

Sign Up / Log In

6 months ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 year ago

Sign Up / Log In

AboutThe Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is a distributed, open, and extensible naming system based on the Ethereum blockchain. ENS’s job is to map human-readable names like ‘alice.eth’ to machine-readable identifiers such as Ethereum addresses, other cryptocurrency addresses, content hashes, and metadata. ENS also supports ‘reverse resolution’, making it possible to associate metadata such as canonical names or interface descriptions with Ethereum addresses. ENS has similar goals to DNS, the Internet’s Domain Name Service, but has significantly different architecture due to the capabilities and constraints provided by the Ethereum blockchain. Like DNS, ENS operates on a system of dot-separated hierarchical names called domains, with the owner of a domain having full control over subdomains. Top-level domains, like ‘.eth’ and ‘.test’, are owned by smart contracts called registrars, which specify rules governing the allocation of their subdomains. Anyone may, by following the rules imposed by these registrar contracts, obtain ownership of a domain for their own use. ENS also supports importing in DNS names already owned by the user for use on ENS. Because of the hierarchal nature of ENS, anyone who owns a domain at any level may configure subdomains - for themselves or others - as desired. For instance, if Alice owns 'alice.eth', she can create 'pay.alice.eth' and configure it as she wishes. ENS is deployed on the Ethereum main network and on several test networks. If you use a library such as the ensjs Javascript library, or an end-user application, it will automatically detect the network you are interacting with and use the ENS deployment on that network.
Details
Links
Source
Categories
Decentralized Identifier (DID)Ethereum EcosystemGovernanceNFTName Service
Date
Market Cap
Volume
Close
April 06, 2026
$221.26M
$17.13M
---
April 06, 2026
$217.77M
$14.25M
---
April 05, 2026
$217.24M
$15.95M
$5.66
April 04, 2026
$211.89M
$13.14M
$5.52
April 03, 2026
$211.93M
$17.97M
$5.52
April 02, 2026
$219.59M
$17.8M
$5.72
April 01, 2026
$217.57M
$17.71M
$5.67
March 31, 2026
$211.96M
$18.17M
$5.52
March 30, 2026
$211.53M
$13.52M
$5.51
March 29, 2026
$215.48M
$13.06M
$5.61

Poll

Crypto Creator of the Year
David Gokhshtein - Host of The Breakdown
Brian Jung - YouTuber
ZachXBT - Crypto Investigator
Scott Melker - The Wolf Of All Streets Podcast

Latest ENS News

Top Discussions

Advertisement|Remove ads.