ETH

Ethereum

Dogecoin started a fresh decline below the $0.1050 zone against the US Dollar. DOGE is now consolidating losses and might face hurdles near $0.10 and $0.1040. DOGE price started a fresh decline below the $0.1050 level. The price is trading below the $0.10 level and the 100-hourly simple moving average. There is a key bearish trend line forming with resistance at $0.1005 on the hourly chart of the DOGE/USD pair (data source from Kraken). The price could extend losses if it stays below $0.1020 and $0.1040. Dogecoin Price Faces Uphill Task Dogecoin price started a fresh decline after it closed below $0.1050, like Bitcoin and Ethereum . DOGE declined below the $0.1040 and $0.1020 support levels. The price even traded below $0.10. A low was formed near $0.0955, and the price is now showing bearish signs. There was a recovery wave above $0.0980, but the price stayed below the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $0.1174 swing high to the $0.0955 low. Dogecoin price is now trading below the $0.10 level and the 100-hourly simple moving average. There is also a key bearish trend line forming with resistance at $0.1005 on the hourly chart of the DOGE/USD pair. If there is a recovery wave, immediate resistance on the upside is near the $0.10 level. The first major resistance for the bulls could be near the $0.1005 level and the trend line. The next major resistance is near the $0.1040 level or the 38.2% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $0.1174 swing high to the $0.0955 low. A close above the $0.1040 resistance might send the price toward the $0.1065 resistance. Any more gains might send the price toward the $0.1120 level. The next major stop for the bulls might be $0.1150. Another Decline In DOGE? If DOGE’s price fails to climb above the $0.1040 level, it could continue to move down. Initial support on the downside is near the $0.0955 level. The next major support is near the $0.0920 level. The main support sits at $0.0880. If there is a downside break below the $0.0880 support, the price could decline further. In the stated case, the price might slide toward the $0.0832 level or even $0.0820 in the near term. Technical Indicators Hourly MACD – The MACD for DOGE/USD is now gaining momentum in the bearish zone. Hourly RSI (Relative Strength Index) – The RSI for DOGE/USD is now below the 50 level. Major Support Levels – $0.0955 and $0.0920. Major Resistance Levels – $0.1005 and $0.1040.

Summary Ethereum down about 1% near $1,921 in early New York trading, according to Reuters. Bitcoin held near $66,275, underscoring a subdued crypto tape despite active two-way flows. Bloomberg flagged fresh idiosyncratic pressure after a filing showed Peter Thiel’s entities exited ETHZilla. Yahoo Finance pointed to persistent drawdown trends, even as institutions keep allocating to the asset. By Ezequiel Gomes ​Ether ( ETH-USD ) drifted lower on Thursday as a softer tone in global equities and a firmer dollar kept traders cautious, leaving the token struggling to regain the $2,000 handle after repeated failed pushes this week. Price action stays tethered to cross-asset cues Reuters reported on February 19, 2026 at 1:56 AM UTC that ethereum fell 1.07% to $1,920.86 as U.S. stocks dipped and the dollar extended gains following mixed economic data. That backdrop matters for ether because it has traded like a high-beta risk proxy for much of this cycle, tending to lag when investors rotate away from momentum exposures and toward cash-like defensives. Volatility has cooled from earlier bursts, but the market still shows a “sell-the-pop” feel around round-number levels, with $2,000 acting more like a supply line than a launchpad. ETH price dynamics (January 2025-February 2026) (Source: TradingView) Traders also kept an eye on rate-sensitive positioning as Treasury yields edged higher, a combination that can tighten financial conditions at the margin and pressure duration-like assets, including large-cap crypto. Headlines add asset-specific friction alongside macro Beyond macro, Bloomberg reported on Feb. 18, 2026 at 6:03 AM UTC (updated 12:24 PM UTC) that billionaire investor Peter Thiel’s entities exited ETHZilla Corp. ( ETHZ ), a company framed around ether treasury exposure, according to an SEC filing. That kind of single-name story does not mechanically dictate spot ETH pricing, but it can influence sentiment around “ETH-treasury” narratives and leverage appetites - especially when broader risk tone is already fragile. Market participants also continue to watch the pipeline of U.S. regulatory and market structure headlines that can shift crypto correlations quickly, from stablecoin policy debates to exchange enforcement updates, even when they are not Ethereum-specific. At the same time, the absence of a clean catalyst has pushed many desks back into level-trading: selling into rebounds, and buying dips only when liquidity and broader risk signals cooperate. What investors are watching next Yahoo Finance carried a report on February 19, 2026 that highlighted ethereum’s prolonged slide over recent months while noting ongoing institutional participation. Near term, price action remains sensitive to whether risk assets stabilize. The Financial Times’ Markets page showed “Private credit stocks slide after Blue Owl halts redemptions at fund” as posted “1 hour ago” on Feb. 19, a reminder that credit jitters can spill into broader risk positioning. For levels, the market’s focus remains straightforward: reclaiming $2,000 would help reduce immediate downside pressure, while sustained trade below the mid-$1,900s would keep the path open to a deeper retracement on renewed risk-off waves. Until cross-asset stress eases, ether’s rallies may keep meeting supply first - leaving traders to treat $2,000 less as a destination and more as a test of how much risk the market is willing to carry. As for a while, Ethereum is stuck in sideways action while bearish trend signals remain dominant. Near-oversold readings hint at a bounce, but confirmation is still missing. This material may contain third-party opinions; none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer . While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity , this post may contain references to products from our partners. Original Post

At ETH Denver, Caitlin Long said the ethics controversy around Trump-linked crypto projects has complicated Senate support.

XRP price extended losses and traded below $1.40. The price is now consolidating losses but faces hurdles near $1.4320 and $1.450. XRP price started another decline and traded below the $1.420 zone. The price is now trading below $1.420 and the 100-hourly Simple Moving Average. There is a key bearish trend line forming with resistance at $1.4620 on the hourly chart of the XRP/USD pair (data source from Kraken). The pair could continue to move down if it stays below $1.4650. XRP Price Extends Losses XRP price failed to stay above $1.450 and extended its decline, like Bitcoin and Ethereum . The price declined below $1.420 and $1.4150 to enter a short-term bearish zone. The price even extended losses below $1.40. A low was formed at $1.3816, and the price is now consolidating losses. There was a minor upward move above the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $1.5120 swing high to the $1.3816 low. The price is now trading below $1.420 and the 100-hourly Simple Moving Average. If there is a fresh recovery move, the price might face resistance near the $1.4320 level. The first major resistance is near the $1.450 level or the 50% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $1.5120 swing high to the $1.3816 low. The main resistance could be $1.4620. There is also a key bearish trend line forming with resistance at $1.4620 on the hourly chart of the XRP/USD pair. A close above $1.4620 could send the price to $1.480. The next hurdle sits at $1.50. A clear move above the $1.50 resistance might send the price toward the $1.5320 resistance. Any more gains might send the price toward the $1.550 resistance. The next major hurdle for the bulls might be near $1.5650. Downside Continuation? If XRP fails to clear the $1.4620 resistance zone, it could start a fresh decline. Initial support on the downside is near the $1.3980 level. The next major support is near the $1.3850 level. If there is a downside break and a close below the $1.3850 level, the price might continue to decline toward $1.3620. The next major support sits near the $1.350 zone, below which the price could continue lower toward $1.320. Technical Indicators Hourly MACD – The MACD for XRP/USD is now gaining pace in the bearish zone. Hourly RSI (Relative Strength Index) – The RSI for XRP/USD is now below the 50 level. Major Support Levels – $1.3850 and $1.3620. Major Resistance Levels – $1.4500 and $1.4620.

BitcoinWorld ETH Spot ETFs Face Alarming Second Day of Net Outflows as BlackRock Leads $130M Withdrawal U.S. financial markets witnessed concerning developments this week as ETH spot ETFs recorded their second consecutive day of significant net outflows, totaling $130.51 million according to data from Trader T. This persistent withdrawal pattern marks a notable shift in investor sentiment toward Ethereum-based exchange-traded funds, particularly affecting major providers like BlackRock. Market analysts now scrutinize whether this represents short-term profit-taking or deeper concerns about digital asset valuations. ETH Spot ETFs Experience Sustained Capital Outflow The recent outflows from ETH spot ETFs demonstrate a clear trend reversal from earlier accumulation patterns. Yesterday’s $130.51 million withdrawal follows similar outflows from the previous trading session, creating a two-day pattern that market participants monitor closely. Significantly, no individual Ethereum ETF recorded net inflows during this period, indicating broad-based selling pressure across the entire product category. This development occurs against a backdrop of evolving regulatory clarity and shifting macroeconomic conditions affecting digital assets. Market data reveals specific allocation changes among major providers. BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) experienced the largest single outflow at $97.11 million, representing approximately 74% of the total daily withdrawals. Meanwhile, Fidelity’s Ethereum Fund (FETH) saw $11.62 million exit, while Bitwise Ethereum Fund (ETHW) recorded a $3.34 million reduction. Grayscale’s Mini Ethereum Trust contributed $18.44 million to the overall outflow figure. These movements suggest institutional investors may be reallocating capital rather than abandoning the asset class entirely. Analyzing the Ethereum ETF Market Context The current outflow pattern emerges within a specific market context that includes several relevant factors. First, Ethereum’s price action has shown increased volatility following recent network upgrades and changing fee structures. Second, broader cryptocurrency markets have experienced consolidation after significant gains earlier in the year. Third, traditional financial markets have displayed shifting risk appetites as interest rate expectations evolve. These interconnected elements create a complex environment for ETF investors making allocation decisions. Historical data provides valuable perspective on current developments. When comparing Ethereum ETF flows to Bitcoin ETF patterns, analysts observe similar cyclical behaviors where periods of accumulation alternate with profit-taking phases. The current outflow magnitude remains within historical norms for digital asset ETFs during consolidation periods. However, the consecutive nature of these outflows warrants attention from market participants monitoring trend sustainability. Institutional Behavior and Market Implications Institutional investment patterns reveal nuanced approaches to digital asset exposure. Large financial institutions typically employ sophisticated timing strategies when managing ETF positions, often responding to technical indicators, regulatory developments, and portfolio rebalancing requirements. The concentration of outflows in BlackRock’s product suggests specific institutional decisions rather than retail investor movements. This distinction matters because institutional flows often signal longer-term positioning changes rather than short-term sentiment shifts. The market impact extends beyond immediate price effects. Sustained ETF outflows can affect market structure by reducing available liquidity and potentially increasing volatility. Furthermore, these flows influence the arbitrage mechanisms that maintain ETF price parity with underlying assets. Market makers and authorized participants must adjust their hedging strategies accordingly, creating secondary effects throughout the Ethereum ecosystem. These technical factors contribute to overall market efficiency and price discovery processes. Regulatory Environment and Future Outlook Current regulatory developments provide essential context for understanding ETF flow patterns. The Securities and Exchange Commission continues to evaluate additional digital asset products while monitoring existing offerings for compliance. Recent guidance on custody requirements and market surveillance has prompted some institutional reassessment of digital asset allocations. Additionally, tax considerations often influence quarterly flow patterns as investors manage capital gains exposure. Looking forward, several factors may influence future ETH spot ETF flows. Upcoming Ethereum network upgrades could affect staking yields and network utility, potentially changing investment thesis calculations. Macroeconomic conditions, particularly interest rate decisions and inflation data, will impact risk asset allocations broadly. Furthermore, the competitive landscape for digital asset investment products continues evolving with new structures and providers entering the market regularly. Comparative Analysis with Traditional ETF Flows When examining flow patterns, digital asset ETFs demonstrate both similarities and differences compared to traditional equity and fixed income ETFs. Like conventional ETFs, digital asset products experience cyclical flows correlated with underlying asset performance. However, cryptocurrency ETFs typically show higher flow volatility and faster response times to market developments. This responsiveness reflects the 24/7 trading nature of underlying markets and different investor demographics participating in these products. The following table illustrates recent flow patterns across major Ethereum ETF providers: ETF Provider Product Ticker Daily Outflow Percentage of Total BlackRock ETHA -$97.11M 74.4% Fidelity FETH -$11.62M 8.9% Bitwise ETHW -$3.34M 2.6% Grayscale Mini ETH -$18.44M 14.1% This distribution highlights the concentrated nature of recent outflows, with BlackRock’s product dominating the movement. Such concentration suggests specific institutional decisions rather than broad retail investor behavior. Market structure analysts note that concentrated flows can create temporary pricing inefficiencies that arbitrage participants may exploit, potentially benefiting market liquidity over time. Conclusion The recent ETH spot ETF outflows represent a significant development in digital asset markets, highlighting evolving investor sentiment and allocation strategies. While two days of withdrawals don’t necessarily indicate a trend reversal, the magnitude and concentration warrant careful monitoring. Market participants should consider these flows within broader context including regulatory developments, network upgrades, and macroeconomic conditions. The ETH spot ETF market continues maturing, with flow patterns increasingly resembling those of established traditional ETF categories while maintaining unique digital asset characteristics. FAQs Q1: What caused the recent ETH spot ETF outflows? The outflows likely resulted from multiple factors including profit-taking after price appreciation, portfolio rebalancing by institutional investors, and reactions to broader market conditions. Specific catalysts may include changing risk assessments and regulatory developments affecting digital asset valuations. Q2: How do ETH spot ETF flows affect Ethereum’s price? ETF flows create indirect price pressure through arbitrage mechanisms. Significant outflows require authorized participants to sell underlying Ethereum, potentially increasing market supply. However, this relationship isn’t always direct due to hedging strategies and market depth considerations. Q3: Are these outflows unusual for digital asset ETFs? Moderate outflow periods occur regularly in digital asset ETF cycles. The current magnitude remains within historical norms, though consecutive days of outflows receive attention from analysts monitoring trend changes in investor sentiment. Q4: What differentiates ETH spot ETFs from futures-based Ethereum ETFs? Spot ETFs hold actual Ethereum tokens, providing direct exposure to price movements. Futures-based ETFs use derivative contracts, introducing different risk profiles, cost structures, and potential tracking errors compared to spot prices. Q5: How might future regulatory changes affect ETH spot ETF flows? Regulatory developments significantly influence institutional participation. Clearer custody rules, tax treatment, and market structure regulations could increase institutional adoption, while restrictive measures might reduce flows. Most analysts expect evolving rather than static regulatory conditions. This post ETH Spot ETFs Face Alarming Second Day of Net Outflows as BlackRock Leads $130M Withdrawal first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Balaji Srinivasan is once again making the most provocative version of a privacy argument and he’s pinning it to a specific chain: Zcash. In a Feb. 18 video shared on X, Srinivasan framed the stakes in stark terms: “The choice is clear. It’s Zcash or communism,” tying the rise of AI-enabled surveillance to what he described as a renewed appetite for wealth seizure. In a follow-up post, he argued that AI has shifted surveillance from a state-scale project to something closer to an on-demand service. “Any scrap of information online can now be integrated, digested, and synthesized…by any state or stalker capable of running an AI model…to form a dossier more complete than anything the Soviets could ever dream of,” he wrote. Srinivasan’s prescription was blunt: “There will be no single silver bullet. But anything you haven’t encrypted can and will be used against you.” Srinivasan anchored his “communism requires surveillance” claim in an historical example meant to make a modern point about data exhaust. “In 1918, in the midst of the Bolshevik Revolution, Lenin gave an order to murder 100 nearby ‘kulaks,’” he said, emphasizing that such an order “required a list”: names, locations, and a population that couldn’t easily move. His argument is that the internet reverses that asymmetry if encryption becomes the default. “Today, neo-communism is rising once again. But the Internet could change the game,” he said. “No full list, if we encrypt it. No fixed location, either. They can’t hit what they can’t see.” Those themes carried into a longer discussion on the Never Say Podcast, where Srinivasan connected privacy to basic operational freedom. “If you’re under surveillance, you’re not sovereign,” he said. “If every move is being tracked…you don’t have the advantage of surprise. You can never launch something. You can never have private deliberations.” Arjun Khemani, a 19-year-old Zcash researcher on the episode, echoed the AI angle from the user side: “Especially with AI, being able to recognize where you are exactly…you can’t have freedom without privacy,” he said, arguing that broadcasting every transaction and context signal is “not… the world that I want to live in.” The choice is clear.It’s Zcash or communism. pic.twitter.com/4sAG9WG0jA — Balaji (@balajis) February 18, 2026 Zcash As A Scaling Bet, Not Just A Privacy Stance Srinivasan’s pitch wasn’t limited to privacy-by-principle. He positioned Zcash as a technical response to where he thinks the market has landed on scalability: on-chain throughput wins, and routing complexity loses. Asked why “Zcash must scale” is a “moral imperative,” Srinivasan contrasted Bitcoin’s scaling reality: exchanges, custodians, and database entries with the decentralization promise many users think they’re buying. “ Lightning …they’ve been saying, ‘Lightning is going to be there any day now’ for 10 years,” he said, arguing that real-world deployments tend toward “a hub and spoke topology” resembling traditional finance rails. “Within a bank, it’s fast…between banks, they do settlement,” he added, describing a dynamic he sees mirrored in major Lightning implementations. From there, he argued crypto has effectively segmented into layers: Bitcoin for immutability and brand, Ethereum for programmability, and Solana for straightforward on-chain execution at scale. The opening he sees for Zcash is combining “Solana-like scalability” with private transactions, leaning on zero-knowledge proofs as “compression technology” as much as secrecy. “It’s what a lot of people wanted Bitcoin to be,” he said. Srinivasan also stressed that privacy doesn’t necessarily replace transparency, it complements it. He argued that Bitcoin’s public ledger can be a feature for proof-of-reserves narratives, while Zcash’s private-by-default design targets a different threat model. His bottom line is coexistence, not conquest: “It’s possible that Bitcoin… and Zcash coexist because Bitcoin is transparent and Zcash is private,” he said, while suggesting “this could be Zcash’s moment.” At press time, ZEC traded at $259.18.

CryptoQuant noted that retail capitulation at this scale has historically appeared during late-stage corrections, though it does not necessarily signal an immediate rebound.

Ethereum price found support near $1,905 and recovered some losses. ETH is now consolidating and faces key hurdles near $1,980. Ethereum is attempting a fresh recovery wave above $1,950. The price is trading below $1,980 and the 100-hourly Simple Moving Average. There is a bearish trend line forming with resistance at $1,985 on the hourly chart of ETH/USD (data feed via Kraken). The pair could start a fresh decline if it stays below the $2,000 zone. Ethereum Price Dips Further Ethereum price failed to stay above $1,950 and started a fresh decline, like Bitcoin . ETH price traded below the $1,935 and $1,920 levels to enter a bearish zone. Finally, the bulls appeared near $1,900. A low was formed at $1,905, and the price started a recovery wave. There was a move above the $1,945 resistance. The price tested the 38.2% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $2,038 swing high to the $1,905 low. Ethereum price is now trading below $1,970 and the 100-hourly Simple Moving Average . If the bulls remain in action above $1,920, the price could attempt another increase. Immediate resistance is seen near the $1,970 level and the 50% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $2,038 swing high to the $1,905 low. The first key resistance is near the $1,985 level. There is also a bearish trend line forming with resistance at $1,985 on the hourly chart of ETH/USD. The next major resistance is near the $2,000 level. A clear move above the $2,000 resistance might send the price toward the $2,050 resistance. An upside break above the $2,050 region might call for more gains in the coming days. In the stated case, Ether could rise toward the $2,120 resistance zone or even $2,150 in the near term. Another Decline In ETH? If Ethereum fails to clear the $1,985 resistance, it could start a fresh decline. Initial support on the downside is near the $1,935 level. The first major support sits near the $1,905 zone. A clear move below the $1,905 support might push the price toward the $1,880 support. Any more losses might send the price toward the $1,840 region. The main support could be $1,820. Technical Indicators Hourly MACD – The MACD for ETH/USD is losing momentum in the bullish zone. Hourly RSI – The RSI for ETH/USD is now above the 50 zone. Major Support Level – $1,905 Major Resistance Level – $1,985

BitcoinWorld Crypto Futures Liquidations Reveal Stunning $99.6M Market Shakeout as Long Positions Dominate Losses Global cryptocurrency derivatives markets experienced significant turbulence over the past 24 hours, culminating in an estimated $99.6 million in futures contract liquidations. This substantial volume of forced position closures, primarily affecting long traders, provides a critical snapshot of current market sentiment and leverage risk. Data from major trading platforms reveals distinct patterns across leading digital assets, offering valuable insights for both institutional and retail participants navigating the volatile crypto landscape. Crypto Futures Liquidations: A Detailed Breakdown of the $99.6M Event The derivatives market serves as a high-leverage arena where traders amplify their exposure to cryptocurrency price movements. Consequently, rapid price shifts trigger automatic margin calls, forcing the closure of positions—a process known as liquidation. The recent 24-hour period proved particularly challenging, with Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL) accounting for the majority of losses. Specifically, Bitcoin saw $46.18 million liquidated, while Ethereum faced $45.6 million. Solana, representing a smaller but significant portion, experienced $7.82 million in forced closures. These figures collectively highlight a concentrated wave of deleveraging across the crypto ecosystem. Market analysts often interpret liquidation clusters as indicators of excessive leverage and potential local price extremes. The concentration of these events within a single day suggests a coordinated market move, possibly driven by macroeconomic news, large wallet movements, or cascading effects from one major liquidation triggering others. Furthermore, the dominance of long position liquidations—where traders bet on price increases—points to a bearish short-term price action that caught optimistic traders off guard. This pattern frequently occurs during unexpected downturns or periods of heightened volatility following sustained bullish trends. Understanding Long vs. Short Position Ratios in Liquidations The liquidation data reveals a crucial narrative through the ratio of long versus short positions affected. For Bitcoin, 58.37% of the liquidated volume came from long positions. Ethereum exhibited an even more pronounced skew, with longs comprising 65.21% of its liquidations. Solana followed a similar trend at 54.71% longs. This overwhelming bias toward long liquidations indicates that the price movement responsible was primarily downward, swiftly breaching the leverage thresholds of those betting on higher prices. Perpetual futures contracts, the instrument behind this data, do not have an expiry date. Instead, they use a funding rate mechanism to tether their price to the underlying spot market. When funding rates turn highly positive, it signals a market overcrowded with long positions, often preceding a “long squeeze” where falling prices force these leveraged longs to liquidate, accelerating the decline. The current ratios suggest such conditions may have been present, especially for Ethereum. Monitoring these ratios provides traders with early warning signals for potential market reversals and volatility spikes. Historical Context and Market Impact of Major Liquidation Events Liquidation events of this magnitude are not unprecedented but serve as important reminders of crypto market risks. For instance, the May 2021 market crash saw single-day liquidation volumes exceeding $10 billion. While the current $99.6 million event is smaller, its structure offers specific lessons. The high correlation between BTC and ETH liquidations shows continued strong price linkage between the two largest crypto assets. Meanwhile, Solana’s presence underscores its established role in the derivatives landscape. The immediate impact of such liquidations is twofold. First, they create forced selling pressure on the underlying asset, potentially exacerbating the price move that triggered them. Second, they flush out excessive leverage from the system, which can sometimes create a more stable foundation for the next price move. Exchanges manage these processes automatically, but large-scale events can temporarily strain liquidity, leading to increased slippage and wider bid-ask spreads. This environment tests the robustness of trading platforms’ risk management systems. Mechanics of Perpetual Futures and Liquidation Triggers To fully grasp these events, one must understand how perpetual futures contracts operate. Traders post an initial margin—a fraction of the contract’s total value—to open a position. The exchange then sets a maintenance margin level. If the position’s unrealized loss consumes the available margin, pushing the account’s equity below this level, the exchange issues a margin call. Failure to add additional funds triggers an automatic liquidation, where the exchange closes the position at the market price to prevent further loss. Key factors influencing liquidation likelihood include leverage level, position size, and market volatility. A trader using 10x leverage faces liquidation after a roughly 10% adverse price move, while a trader at 5x leverage can withstand about 20%. The past 24 hours likely saw a volatility spike that rapidly crossed these thresholds for many highly-leveraged accounts. Exchanges use sophisticated mark price systems, often an average of spot prices from major venues, to prevent manipulation during these sensitive periods. Expert Analysis on Risk Management and Trader Psychology Seasoned derivatives traders emphasize that liquidation events are often symptoms of poor risk management. Setting appropriate stop-loss orders, using lower leverage, and diversifying across time frames can mitigate the risk of a forced exit. The psychological component is equally critical. The fear of missing out (FOMO) can drive traders to enter over-leveraged long positions during rallies, precisely when the risk of a long squeeze is highest. Conversely, disciplined traders view high liquidation volumes as potential signals for market exhaustion and reversal points. Data from on-chain analytics firms often complements liquidation metrics. For example, monitoring exchange inflows can show if leveraged positions are being unwound voluntarily before a liquidation cascade. Similarly, tracking the aggregate estimated leverage ratio across derivatives platforms provides a macro view of systemic risk. The current data, showing a dominance of long liquidations, aligns with a market cooling off after a period of bullish sentiment, a common cycle in crypto’s volatile history. Conclusion The analysis of 24-hour crypto futures liquidations, totaling $99.6 million, provides a transparent window into the high-stakes world of cryptocurrency derivatives. The pronounced skew toward long position liquidations for BTC, ETH, and SOL underscores a market phase where optimistic leverage met with corrective price action. These events, while disruptive, perform a necessary function by resetting leverage and highlighting the non-negotiable importance of robust risk management. For the broader ecosystem, understanding these liquidation dynamics is essential for navigating volatility and building more resilient trading strategies in the evolving digital asset landscape. FAQs Q1: What does “long position liquidation” mean? A long position liquidation occurs when a trader who has borrowed funds to bet on a price increase (a long position) suffers losses that erase their posted collateral. The exchange then forcibly closes the position to prevent further debt. Q2: Why are Ethereum’s long liquidations (65.21%) higher than Bitcoin’s (58.37%)? This typically indicates that Ethereum’s derivatives market was more overcrowded with leveraged long positions relative to its recent price volatility, making it more susceptible to a long squeeze during a downward move. Q3: Do large liquidation events like this cause the price to drop further? Often, yes. The process of liquidation involves the exchange selling the asset to close the position, which creates additional sell pressure in the market. This can lead to a cascading effect, especially if many liquidations happen in a short time frame. Q4: What is a “perpetual futures” contract? A perpetual futures contract is a derivative instrument that allows traders to speculate on an asset’s future price without an expiry date. Its price is kept aligned with the spot market through a periodic funding fee exchanged between long and short traders. Q5: How can traders avoid being liquidated? Traders can avoid liquidation by using lower leverage, employing stop-loss orders to exit positions before margin calls, maintaining sufficient collateral buffer above the maintenance margin, and actively monitoring their positions during periods of high volatility. This post Crypto Futures Liquidations Reveal Stunning $99.6M Market Shakeout as Long Positions Dominate Losses first appeared on BitcoinWorld .