SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1

Micron Technology, Inc. engages in the provision of innovative memory and storage solutions. It operates through the following segments: Compute and Networking Business Unit (CNBU), Mobile Business Unit (MBU), Embedded Business Unit (EBU), and Storage Business Unit (SBU). The CNBU segment includes memory products and solutions sold into client, cloud server, enterprise, graphics, and networking markets. The MBU segment is involved in memory and storage products sold into smartphone and other mobile-device markets. The EBU segment focuses on memory and storage products sold into automotive, industrial, and consumer Markets. The SBU segment consists of SSDs and component-level solutions sold into enterprise and cloud, client, and consumer storage markets. The company was founded by Ward D. Parkinson, Joseph Leon Parkinson, Dennis Wilson, and Doug Pitman on October 5, 1978 and is headquartered in Boise, ID.

Micron Technology Inc.

Micron Technology Inc

Micron Technology is trending as investors aggressively buy into a structural memory supply shortage fueled by AI data center demand, with community sentiment shifting toward the belief that long-term re-rating is underway. Discussion is dominated by the stock's parabolic climb, the massive gains in options trading, and intense debate over whether this represents a sustainable AI-driven value play or an overextended blow-off top.

Digi Power X, Inc. is a block chain technology company, which engages in crypto currency mining. It focuses on validation through mining, hosting solutions, and blockchain software solutions. It operates through the following segments: Cryptocurrency Mining, Sales of Energy and Electricity, and Colocation Services. The company was founded on February 18, 2017, and is headquartered in Miami, FL.

Digi Power X Inc. - Ordinary Shares (Sub voting)

Digi Power X is trending following a massive $1.1 billion contract with Cerebras Systems for a 40MW AI data center, sparking intense community debate over its long-term valuation versus the potential impact of share dilution. Investors are actively tracking high trading volumes and comparing the stock to other AI infrastructure players as they discuss whether this deal serves as a transformative catalyst or a short-term trading opportunity.

PayPal Holdings, Inc. engages in the development of technology platforms that enable digital payments and simplifies commerce experiences on behalf of merchants and consumers worldwide. Its solutions include PayPal, PayPal Credit, Braintree, Venmo, Xoom, and Paydiant products. The firm also enables consumers to exchange funds with merchants using funding sources, which include bank account, PayPal account balance, PayPal Credit account, credit, and debit card or other stored value products. It operates through United States and Other Countries geographical segments. The company was founded in December 1998 and is headquartered in San Jose, CA.

PayPal Holdings Inc

PayPal is trending after reports surfaced that the company is reorganizing into three distinct business units to spin off Venmo as a standalone entity, signaling a strategic shift aimed at unlocking value and attracting potential acquirers. While the market response has been mixed, the community is actively debating whether this structural resetalongside ongoing buybacks and cost-cutting initiativesis the necessary catalyst to finally re-rate the stock or if it remains a value trap in a competitive fintech landscape.

Intel Corp. engages in the design, manufacture, and sale of computer products and technologies. It delivers computer, networking, data storage, and communications platforms. The firm operates through the following segments: Client Computing Group (CCG), Data Center and AI (DCAI), Intel Foundry Services (IFS), and All Other. The CCG segment consists of platforms designed for notebooks, 2-in-1 systems, desktops, tablets, phones, wireless and wired connectivity products, and mobile communication components. The DCAI segment delivers solutions to cloud service providers and enterprise customers, along with silicon devices for communications service providers and high-performance computing customers. The IFS segment refers to full stack solutions created from the foundry industry ecosystem. The All Other segment represents results from other non-reportable segments and corporate-related charges. The company was founded by Robert Norton Noyce and Gordon Earle Moore on July 18, 1968, and is headquartered in Santa Clara, CA.

Intel Corp.

Intel Corp

Intel is seeing significant market momentum driven by reports that Apple is exploring the company's foundry services for future chip production. While the community remains divided between investors celebrating a parabolic rally and skeptics calling for a correction, the stock continues to be a focal point for AI-linked infrastructure speculation and intense short-squeeze discussions.

Sandisk Corp. engages in the development, manufacture, and provision of storage devices and solutions based on NAND flash technology. Its products include solid state drives, memory cards, and USB flash drives. The company was founded on February 5, 2024 and is headquartered in Milpitas, CA.

Sandisk Corp

Sandisk is experiencing a massive, momentum-driven rally fueled by severe structural NAND flash memory shortages and surging demand for AI data center storage, leading to intense community debate over whether the stock is undergoing a fundamental re-rating or forming a dangerous bubble. Investors are actively discussing the stock's parabolic trajectory and the potential for a share split, while debating the risks of entering at current levels compared to the potential for further upside as memory supply remains constrained through 2028.

SoundHound AI, Inc. engages in the development, owning, and commercialization of voice, sound, and natural language artificial intelligence technologies and related activities. The company was founded on September 2, 2005 and is headquartered in Santa Clara, CA.

SoundHound AI Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class A

SoundHound AI Inc

SoundHound AI is experiencing significant market attention and upward momentum as investors speculate on a potential short squeeze ahead of its upcoming earnings report. The community is actively debating the stock's volatility, focusing on its high short interest and the strategic impact of recent product launches and acquisitions on long-term growth.

Firefly Aerospace, Inc. engages in the design and manufacture of space launch vehicles. It offers Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and orbital transfer vehicles. The company was founded by Thomas E. Markusic, Mark Watt, and Max Polyakov in January 27, 2017 and is headquartered in Cedar Park, TX.

Firefly Aerospace Inc.

Firefly Aerospace is trending following strong quarterly revenue growth and its strategic involvement in key defense initiatives like the Golden Dome program, fueling community optimism about its long-term potential as an integrated defense-tech platform. Investors are actively debating the company's valuation against peers, with many focusing on the growing pipeline of government contracts and the potential for a sector-wide re-rating as the commercial space economy expands.

Shopify, Inc. is a global commerce company that provides essential internet infrastructure for commerce, offering trusted tools to start, scale, market, and run a retail business of any size. The Company's software enables merchants to run their business across all of their sales channels, including web and mobile storefronts, physical retail locations, social media storefronts and marketplaces. The Shopify platform provides merchants with a single view of their business across all of their sales channels and enables them to manage products and inventory, process orders and payments, fulfill and ship orders, build customer relationships, source products, leverage analytics and reporting and access financing, all from one integrated back office. The company was founded on September 28, 2004 and is headquartered in Ottawa, Canada.

Shopify Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class A (Sub Voting)

Shopify Inc

Shopify is facing a valuation reset and short-term volatility following its latest earnings, with investors divided between those reacting to forward guidance concerns and those focused on its long-term AI-driven commerce thesis. The community is actively debating the company's valuation metrics and the potential for a rebound, while closely monitoring key price levels and institutional accumulation patterns.

Coinbase Global, Inc. engages in the provision of a trusted platform that serves as a compliant on-ramp to the onchain economy and enables users to engage in a wide variety of activities with their crypto assets in both proprietary and third-party product experiences enabled by access to decentralized applications. It offers consumers primary financial account for the cryptoeconomy, institutions a full-service prime brokerage platform with access to deep pools of liquidity across the crypto marketplace, and developers a suite of products granting access to build onchain. The company was founded by Brian Armstrong and Fred Ernest Ehrsam in May 2012 and is headquartered in New York, NY.

Coinbase Global Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class A

Coinbase Global Inc

Coinbase is experiencing significant market volatility driven by a 14% workforce reduction and a strategic pivot toward AI-native operations ahead of its upcoming earnings report. The community remains deeply polarized, with some investors betting on margin expansion and long-term regulatory clarity, while others express frustration over stagnant price action and compare the company's recent operational shifts to broader industry headwinds.

AIOS Tech, Inc. is an investment holding company, which engages in the provision of financing solutions to small- and mid-size enterprises. The company was founded on May 29, 2012 and is headquartered in Shanghai, China.

AIOS Tech Inc. - Ordinary Shares - Class A

AIOS Tech Inc.

AIOS is experiencing extreme volatility driven by a recent reverse stock split and a pivot to AI, fueling intense speculation among traders regarding its potential for a parabolic short squeeze. Community sentiment is deeply polarized, with many retail traders chasing the low-float setup for quick gains while others dismiss the move as a classic pump-and-dump cycle typical of heavily indebted micro-cap stocks.

statis crypto Watchlist

Bitcoin

Ethereum

Solana

Ripple

Dogecoin

Cardano

statis IN Watchlist

Nifty 50

Nifty Bank

Reliance Industries Ltd.

Zomato Ltd.

Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Motors Ltd.

HDFC Bank Ltd.

ITC Ltd.

Adani Enterprises Ltd

Axis Bank Ltd

Bajaj Finance Ltd

statis US Watchlist

SPDR S&P 500 ETF

Apple Inc.

Tesla Inc

Microsoft Corporation

NVIDIA Corp

 Hey, I want to invite you to join Stocktwits. It’s the largest global community of active traders. You’ll get access to the real-time market insights, news, discussion and much more! You can sign up using my unique link below 
 


 has invited you to join Stocktwits

Saudi Arabia is increasingly confident that Iran directly launched a complex missile &amp; drone attack from its southwestern territory on Saturday. The drones &amp; missiles appeared to have flown low to the ground, so that they weren&#39;t detected by Saudi radar or defense systems.

US admin quickly concluded that Iran launched cruise missiles &amp;  drones on Saturday. UK &amp; France, key US allies, say they have not seen evidence to support the allegations that Iran carried out the attacks.

US has taken the lead in providing security for the Persian Gulf monarchies for decades in part out of a strategy of protecting the world&#39;s oil supply.

Saudi Arabia&#39;s cabinet released a statement asking the international community for support in responding to the attack. Riyadh didn&#39;t mention Iran, though it has rejected claims of responsibility by Yemen&#39;s Iranian-back Houthi rebels.

US does not have mutual defense agreement with Saudi Arabia, therefore has no legal basis to attack Iran.

$USO $CL_F $XLE $XOP

StockTwits Web

Light, Sweet Crude Oil Futures

United States Oil Fund

Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund

SPDR Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF

Saudi Arabia is increasingly confident that Iran directly launched a complex missile & drone attack from its southwestern territory on Saturday. The drones & missiles appeared to have flown low to the ground, so that they weren't detected by Saudi radar or defense systems.

US admin quickly concluded that Iran launched cruise missiles &  drones on Saturday. UK & France, key US allies, say they have not seen evidence to support the allegations that Iran carried out the attacks.

US has taken the lead in providing security for the Persian Gulf monarchies for decades in part out of a strategy of protecting the world's oil supply.

Saudi Arabia's cabinet released a statement asking the international community for support in responding to the attack. Riyadh didn't mention Iran, though it has rejected claims of responsibility by Yemen's Iranian-back Houthi rebels.

US does not have mutual defense agreement with Saudi Arabia, therefore has no legal basis to attack Iran.



Amazon.com Inc

SPDR Gold Shares ETF

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF

Alphabet Inc Class A

Ro Patel

@Ro_Patel All the more reason to increase our oil production capacity and get in the habit of letting the House of Saud worry about themselves.   Especially if they keep making a habit of attacking Yemen.

Our Middle East policy should be what we should have done at end of WW2,
Let Russia and Germany go at it 🍿 
We can be behind the scenes with tech and support for our allies and freinenemies, and a-few special forces hit and runs.
Pretty sure that’s what Trump has been doing. 
No doubt Kerry and Obama administration has been advising Iran to get Trump to take an unpopular, war with Iran

StockTwits for iOS

CoastalHillbilly

 All the more reason to increase our oil production capacity and get in the habit of letting the House of Saud worry about themselves.   Especially if they keep making a habit of attacking Yemen.

Trump Media & Technology Group Corp.

US Dollar Index

Rumble Inc

Tell It Right

@Tell_It_Right Fair point, unfortunately, large GOP donors are a large part of the existing oil infrastructure in the US &amp; their continued support for the GOP is predicated on maintaining the status-quo.

There is little-to-no-reason why the Trump Admin is rolling back emission &amp; milage standards for autos and the Clean Air Act &amp; Clean Water Act other than as quid-pro-quo for their large donors. 

In 2001 under the Bush Admin, the NHTSA blocked Honda &amp; Toyota from installing stop-start tech in their vehicles. The tech (currently used in Europe) would have saved 4B gallons of gasoline/year and would have reduced air &amp; noise pollution. Further, the Bush Admin enacted the Energy Policy Act in 2005 - which has come to be known as the “Dick Cheney energy bill”. Cheney was CEO of Halliburton from 1995 until he left in 2000. 

The avg American drives 37 miles/day. Nissan Leaf has 200 mile range.

Therefore, the oil infrastructure will continue as long as voters continue to vote Republican.

Mark G

TraderDarren

Jon C

 Fair point, unfortunately, large GOP donors are a large part of the existing oil infrastructure in the US & their continued support for the GOP is predicated on maintaining the status-quo.

There is little-to-no-reason why the Trump Admin is rolling back emission & milage standards for autos and the Clean Air Act & Clean Water Act other than as quid-pro-quo for their large donors. 

In 2001 under the Bush Admin, the NHTSA blocked Honda & Toyota from installing stop-start tech in their vehicles. The tech (currently used in Europe) would have saved 4B gallons of gasoline/year and would have reduced air & noise pollution. Further, the Bush Admin enacted the Energy Policy Act in 2005 - which has come to be known as the “Dick Cheney energy bill”. Cheney was CEO of Halliburton from 1995 until he left in 2000. 

The avg American drives 37 miles/day. Nissan Leaf has 200 mile range.

Therefore, the oil infrastructure will continue as long as voters continue to vote Republican.

@Ro_Patel How is the electricity produced where you live?  And does your electrical grid handle the demand well?  Not poling fun at the Leaf or other EV&#39;s.  Just simply stating that in much of the country, driving an EV = driving a coal powered car.   That&#39;s fine if you want to do that (free market choices).  And maybe the electrical grid in your area can handle it if a major portion of drivers switched to EV&#39;s.  And maybe your power suppliers can magically generate more electricity without harming the environment.  (I personally believe solar has a lot of promise, at least in the south where we have 5 hours per day avg solar usable sunlight.  I&#39;ve even thought about powering my own home with 100% solar.)  Until that happens I&#39;m skeptical with pushing everybody to EV&#39;s.  And I certainly don&#39;t want to do it by force.

 How is the electricity produced where you live?  And does your electrical grid handle the demand well?  Not poling fun at the Leaf or other EV's.  Just simply stating that in much of the country, driving an EV = driving a coal powered car.   That's fine if you want to do that (free market choices).  And maybe the electrical grid in your area can handle it if a major portion of drivers switched to EV's.  And maybe your power suppliers can magically generate more electricity without harming the environment.  (I personally believe solar has a lot of promise, at least in the south where we have 5 hours per day avg solar usable sunlight.  I've even thought about powering my own home with 100% solar.)  Until that happens I'm skeptical with pushing everybody to EV's.  And I certainly don't want to do it by force.

@Tell_It_Right Sorry for the late reply. 

In order to live in a civilized society, one must accept some govt intervention in the market - it is simply good public policy - from time zones to labor &amp; discrimination laws to amount of chemicals in our water. Using your example of cars - the govt should not allow people to drive around in a tank or drive at any speed. There needs to be some sensible laws.

IMHO, it is incorrect to assert that 1970s oil shock was attributed to drilling restrictions in the US. The oil crisis was created when OPEC proclaimed an embargo to target nations that supported Israel during the Yom Kippur War (price of oil increased from $3/barrel to $12/barrel). Another shock occurred in 1979 after the Iranian Revolution (After Mossaddegh briefly nationalised the Iranian Oil Industry in 1952, the US/CIA orchestrated a coup d&#39;état in 1953 &amp; installed The Shah as their &quot;strongman&quot;).

For the next 20 years oil prices continued to drop.

Trevor Stafford

 Sorry for the late reply. 

In order to live in a civilized society, one must accept some govt intervention in the market - it is simply good public policy - from time zones to labor & discrimination laws to amount of chemicals in our water. Using your example of cars - the govt should not allow people to drive around in a tank or drive at any speed. There needs to be some sensible laws.

IMHO, it is incorrect to assert that 1970s oil shock was attributed to drilling restrictions in the US. The oil crisis was created when OPEC proclaimed an embargo to target nations that supported Israel during the Yom Kippur War (price of oil increased from $3/barrel to $12/barrel). Another shock occurred in 1979 after the Iranian Revolution (After Mossaddegh briefly nationalised the Iranian Oil Industry in 1952, the US/CIA orchestrated a coup d'état in 1953 & installed The Shah as their "strongman").

For the next 20 years oil prices continued to drop.

@Tell_It_Right So, why has the price of oil gone up since 2000 - China. China become a member of the WTO in 2001. Subsequently, emerging market demand continued to grow.

OPEC, a cartel, is the single most influential agency affecting the price of oil today.

 Further, I had mentioned the 2005 Energy Policy - w/n the policy, fracking is exempt from the Safe Water Act &amp; it strips the EPA from regulating the industry. The EPA shoulders very little blame for the price of oil.

As to the term &quot;free market&quot; - that does not exist outside of textbooks. Any law, rule, regulation, etc is a perversion to that idea. In order to have free/fair market, there can not be any asymmetry of information - and this is only possible when laws, rules, regulations, etc are enacted, therefore not a free market by definition.

 So, why has the price of oil gone up since 2000 - China. China become a member of the WTO in 2001. Subsequently, emerging market demand continued to grow.

OPEC, a cartel, is the single most influential agency affecting the price of oil today.

 Further, I had mentioned the 2005 Energy Policy - w/n the policy, fracking is exempt from the Safe Water Act & it strips the EPA from regulating the industry. The EPA shoulders very little blame for the price of oil.

As to the term "free market" - that does not exist outside of textbooks. Any law, rule, regulation, etc is a perversion to that idea. In order to have free/fair market, there can not be any asymmetry of information - and this is only possible when laws, rules, regulations, etc are enacted, therefore not a free market by definition.

@Ro_Patel  Wasn&#39;t fracking hardly done back in 2000?  Correct me if I&#39;m wrong, but didn&#39;t the number of fracking wells really pick up around 2014 or 2015?  If I&#39;m right, fracking would have had little impact on the price of oil, while China&#39;s demand does (on that we&#39;re very much in agreement). 
 
I&#39;m not saying we have a totally free market.  But surely you&#39;d agree that fracking has made the oil market much more of a free market than it was before fracking became a thing.  Surely you agree that the federal govt owning over 80% of the land in the state of Nevada, much of which is very oil rich, is very much a distortion on the oil market. 
 
I&#39;m not saying totally ditch the EPA or anything like that.  I&#39;m just saying appreciate how fracking has made oil on private land available to enter the market (since the government has tight control over the easy to access oil on public land).   Thing about all the benefits to society with people able to drive what they want.

  Wasn't fracking hardly done back in 2000?  Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the number of fracking wells really pick up around 2014 or 2015?  If I'm right, fracking would have had little impact on the price of oil, while China's demand does (on that we're very much in agreement). 
 
I'm not saying we have a totally free market.  But surely you'd agree that fracking has made the oil market much more of a free market than it was before fracking became a thing.  Surely you agree that the federal govt owning over 80% of the land in the state of Nevada, much of which is very oil rich, is very much a distortion on the oil market. 
 
I'm not saying totally ditch the EPA or anything like that.  I'm just saying appreciate how fracking has made oil on private land available to enter the market (since the government has tight control over the easy to access oil on public land).   Thing about all the benefits to society with people able to drive what they want.

@Ro_Patel Women have access to jobs they didn&#39;t otherwise have when cars were cheap enough for a family to buy two cars.  And don&#39;t overlook the cost in insurance, particularly the medical liability portion, that comes with everybody driving teeny go-carts relative to the cars I drove when I was young.  I&#39;m not saying force everybody to drive the kind of cars I like to drive (because I&#39;m not a my-way-or-the-highway kind of person).  I&#39;m just saying let those who are concerned about traffic fatalities buy the heavy car they want without CAFE fines punishing them for it.

 Women have access to jobs they didn't otherwise have when cars were cheap enough for a family to buy two cars.  And don't overlook the cost in insurance, particularly the medical liability portion, that comes with everybody driving teeny go-carts relative to the cars I drove when I was young.  I'm not saying force everybody to drive the kind of cars I like to drive (because I'm not a my-way-or-the-highway kind of person).  I'm just saying let those who are concerned about traffic fatalities buy the heavy car they want without CAFE fines punishing them for it.

@Tell_It_Right Fracking began in the 1950s, if I&#39;m not mistaken. In Western Canada, we started in the 1970s. You are correct that massive hydraulic fracturing projects began in 2010. In 2000, there were about 276,000 natural gas wells in the US. But by 2010, that number had almost doubled to 510,000. And every year, about 13,000 new wells are drilled.

Fracking does not in itself make the market more free - it simply adds to the supply of oil. When that supply is in excess of the demand, the price will subsequently fall. However, when that supply is disrupted by OPEC, then the oil price will increase.  In addition, untapped reserves do not distort the oil market - only the current supply &amp; demand. We are currently swimming in oil. We have over 50+ years of oil left on the planet.

 Fracking began in the 1950s, if I'm not mistaken. In Western Canada, we started in the 1970s. You are correct that massive hydraulic fracturing projects began in 2010. In 2000, there were about 276,000 natural gas wells in the US. But by 2010, that number had almost doubled to 510,000. And every year, about 13,000 new wells are drilled.

Fracking does not in itself make the market more free - it simply adds to the supply of oil. When that supply is in excess of the demand, the price will subsequently fall. However, when that supply is disrupted by OPEC, then the oil price will increase.  In addition, untapped reserves do not distort the oil market - only the current supply & demand. We are currently swimming in oil. We have over 50+ years of oil left on the planet.

@Ro_Patel @Tell_It_Right.  Let me tell you this.  Car makers are wayyy behind the times on the enginering of making anything reliable for long term use.  Do Not buy anything first gen.  Who wants to spend 25 or 30k on a hybrid thats gonna play out after 100k miles.  Turn around buy another or spend 7k in repairs.  My gas and diesel hogs that will trek 300k or 400k are well worth spending the extra $5 or $10 dollars every fill up a week then buying modern junk thats gonna save pennies a week...

StockTwits For Android 

.  Let me tell you this.  Car makers are wayyy behind the times on the enginering of making anything reliable for long term use.  Do Not buy anything first gen.  Who wants to spend 25 or 30k on a hybrid thats gonna play out after 100k miles.  Turn around buy another or spend 7k in repairs.  My gas and diesel hogs that will trek 300k or 400k are well worth spending the extra $5 or $10 dollars every fill up a week then buying modern junk thats gonna save pennies a week...

Steven Marek

@Tell_It_Right There was a paper I read, maybe 10 years ago, about auto fatalities and the size of vehicles. It was posited that having multiple size &amp; weight of autos contribute to increased fatality rates. Without regulation, bumper heights on vehicles do not match up. Further, the notion that bigger is better is creating a war on size/weight of autos on the road. It was an interesting paper - imagine if we all drove around in golf carts...how fun would that be!! I understand that a car is an extension of the drivers personality &amp; that one does not want to limit a person&#39;s choice but can you honestly say that CAFE standards limited and/or added a significant cost to the purchase of a vehicle. Shouldn&#39;t we be striving to use less gas/oil. The same argument was used when heating oil was getting phased out - govt/insurance companies limiting choice...really...really...no one dies of exposure &amp; we are doing fine with nat gas/electric heat.

 There was a paper I read, maybe 10 years ago, about auto fatalities and the size of vehicles. It was posited that having multiple size & weight of autos contribute to increased fatality rates. Without regulation, bumper heights on vehicles do not match up. Further, the notion that bigger is better is creating a war on size/weight of autos on the road. It was an interesting paper - imagine if we all drove around in golf carts...how fun would that be!! I understand that a car is an extension of the drivers personality & that one does not want to limit a person's choice but can you honestly say that CAFE standards limited and/or added a significant cost to the purchase of a vehicle. Shouldn't we be striving to use less gas/oil. The same argument was used when heating oil was getting phased out - govt/insurance companies limiting choice...really...really...no one dies of exposure & we are doing fine with nat gas/electric heat.

@Ro_Patel @Tell_It_Right u know what leads to more fatalities. Dumb people behind a wheel.  MOBILE PHONES

Yep dirty. rotten humans are piss poor drivers, drowsy driving is responsible for more accidents than drunk driving, phones likely worse too

 u know what leads to more fatalities. Dumb people behind a wheel.  MOBILE PHONES