SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1

Microsoft Corp. engages in the development and support of software, services, devices, and solutions. It operates through the following segments: Productivity and Business Processes, Intelligent Cloud, and More Personal Computing. The Productivity and Business Processes segment is composed of products and services relating to productivity, communication, and information services such as Office Commercial, Office Consumer, LinkedIn, and Dynamics business solutions. The Intelligent Cloud segment consists of public, private, and hybrid server products and cloud services for businesses and developers, as well as enterprise and partner services. The More Personal Computing segment refers to products and services including Windows operating system, Windows cloud services, Surface, HoloLens, personal computer accessories, Xbox hardware, Xbox Cloud Gaming, Microsoft News, and Microsoft Edge. The company was founded by Paul Gardner Allen and William Henry Gates, III in 1975 and is headquartered in Redmond, WA.

Microsoft Corporation

Microsoft Corp

Microsoft is facing significant selling pressure and heightened volatility as traders debate the impact of AI competition, slowing cloud growth, and persistent macro-uncertainty. The community is actively weighing the stock's recent technical weakness against its long-term potential as a diversified enterprise leader, with many retail investors debating whether current levels represent a generational buying opportunity or further downside risk.

Memecoin on Cronos launched by the Cro Crow community

crow with knife

The crow with knife community is aggressively promoting the token as a top-tier multichain meme coin, highlighting its unique burn mechanism and expanding presence across major blockchains like Cronos and Solana. Investors are actively discussing its potential for growth, citing the project's organic momentum and a highly dedicated, cult-like following that frequently refers to it as the only viable option in the current market.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. is a space exploration, infrastructure, and services company, which engages in contributing to the establishment of cislunar infrastructure and helping to develop cislunar and deep space commerce. It offers space products and services. The company was founded by Stephen J. Altemus, Kam Ghaffarian, and Timothy P. Crain in 2013 and is headquartered in Houston, TX.

Intuitive Machines Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class A

Intuitive Machines Inc

Intuitive Machines is surging after management provided a bullish 2026 revenue outlook of up to $1 billion, significantly boosting investor sentiment despite earlier volatility. The community is actively discussing the stock's massive backlog and the anticipation of upcoming NASA contract awards, with many bulls viewing the recent price swings as a shakeout opportunity to accumulate shares.

The Trade Desk, Inc. engages in the provision of a self-service and cloud-based ad-buying platform. It operates through the United States and International geographical segments. The firm offers omnichannel advertising, audience targeting, solutions for identity, application programming interface (API), custom, and programmatic, measurement and optimization. The company was founded by Jeffrey Terry Green and David Pickles in November 2009 and is headquartered in Ventura, CA.

Trade Desk Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class A

Trade Desk Inc

Trade Desk is facing significant selling pressure as investors react to reports that Publicis Groupe has launched an audit and halted recommendations of the platform over billing and transparency disputes. The stock remains a major talking point in the community, with bulls pointing to the CEO's recent heavy share purchases and solid fundamentals as a reason to buy the dip, while bears argue that the audit risks creating a permanent loss of trust among major agency partners.

Lumentum Holdings, Inc. engages in the provision of optical and photonic products. It operates through the Cloud and Networking, and Industrial Tech segments. The Cloud and Networking segment refers to a portfolio of optical and photonic components, modules, and subsystems. The Industrial Tech segment includes solid-state lasers, kilowatt-class fiber lasers, ultrafast lasers, diode lasers, and gas lasers. The company was founded in 1979 and is headquartered in San Jose, CA.

Lumentum Holdings Inc

Lumentum Holdings Inc is trending as it joins the S&P 500, with investors debating whether the index inclusion and strong AI-driven demand for its optical technology justify its high valuation or if the stock is reaching bubble territory. The community remains heavily focused on the stock's extreme volatility and its role as a key infrastructure provider in the expanding data center ecosystem.

FuboTV, Inc. is a consumer-first live TV streaming company with the mission of delivering premium sports, news and entertainment programming that offers greater choice, flexibility and value. The company was founded by David Gandler, Alberto Horihuela Suarez, and Sung Ho Choi on February 20, 2009 and is headquartered in New York, NY.

fuboTV Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class A

fuboTV Inc

Investors are expressing intense frustration and skepticism regarding FuboTV's impending reverse stock split, with many in the community labeling the company a failing venture while others hold out hope for a short squeeze on the low float. Discussions are dominated by allegations of executive mismanagement and ongoing concerns that the company's strategic integration with Disney has failed to drive the expected value for retail shareholders.

Alphabet, Inc. is a holding company, which engages in software, health care, transportation, and other technologies. It operates through the following segments: Google Services, Google Cloud, and Other Bets. The Google Services segment includes products and services, such as ads, Android, Chrome, devices, Google Maps, Google Play, Search, and YouTube. The Google Cloud segment refers to infrastructure and platform services, collaboration tools, and other services for enterprise customers. The Other Bets segment relates to the sale of healthcare-related services and internet services. The company was founded by Lawrence E. Page and Sergey Mikhaylovich Brin on October 2, 2015 and is headquartered in Mountain View, CA.

Alphabet Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class A

Alphabet Inc Class A

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is under pressure as investors navigate rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and concerns over aggressive AI infrastructure spending, with community sentiment divided between viewing the stock as a long-term bargain and fearing further technical breakdowns. Traders are actively debating the significance of the $296-$300 support level, while analysts remain focused on the potential impact of its data center investments and evolving AI partnerships.

DraftKings, Inc. is a digital sports entertainment and gaming company, which engages in the provision of online sports betting, online casino, daily fantasy sports product offerings, DraftKings Marketplace, retail sportsbook, media, and other consumer product offerings. The company was founded by Jason D. Robins, Matthew Kalish, and Paul Liberman on December 31, 2011 and is headquartered in Boston, MA.

DraftKings Inc. - Ordinary Shares - Class A

DraftKings Inc

DraftKings is currently trending as investors debate the impact of a proposed bipartisan Senate bill aimed at banning prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket from offering sports-related contracts. Community discussion is polarized, with bulls viewing the potential regulation as a protective moat for established sportsbooks, while bears focus on persistent insider selling, management sentiment, and concerns regarding the stock's performance relative to broader market gains.

Circle Internet Group, Inc. is a financial technology company that enables businesses of all sizes to harness the power of digital currencies and public blockchains for payments, commerce and financial applications worldwide. The company was founded by Jeremy J. Allaire and Patrick Sean Neville in August 2013 and is headquartered in New York, NY.

Circle Internet Group Inc. - Ordinary Shares - Class A

Circle

Circle (CRCL) is experiencing significant downward pressure as investors react to the Clarity Act's proposed restrictions on stablecoin yield, which threaten to eliminate passive interest payments on balances. While some market participants express concerns that this legislation could gut the company's business model, many community members remain bullish, viewing the current volatility as a potential buying opportunity amidst the broader transition toward institutional adoption and real-world asset tokenization.

Far below the surface, where light no longer reaches and noise collapses into silence, the Sperm Whale endures.  It does not rely on speed or spectacle. It survives through mass, intelligence, and absolute awareness of its surroundings.  This project is shaped by the same principle — strength formed under pressure, movement guided by understanding, and conviction built where others cannot remain.  While the surface reacts, the deep decides.

The Sperm Whale

SPERMWHALE is trending as traders speculate on potential explosive growth, with a vocal community debating whether the token is a legitimate high-potential play or a classic pump-and-dump scheme. Investors are currently hyper-focused on its chart consolidation, increasing holder counts, and low market cap, leading to intense discussions regarding its sustainability versus the risk of a rapid rug pull.

statis crypto Watchlist

Bitcoin

Ethereum

Solana

Ripple

Dogecoin

Cardano

statis IN Watchlist

Nifty 50

Nifty Bank

Reliance Industries Ltd.

Zomato Ltd.

Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Motors Ltd.

HDFC Bank Ltd.

ITC Ltd.

Adani Enterprises Ltd

Axis Bank Ltd

Bajaj Finance Ltd

statis US Watchlist

SPDR S&P 500 ETF

Apple Inc.

Tesla Inc

NVIDIA Corp

 Hey, I want to invite you to join Stocktwits. It’s the largest global community of active traders. You’ll get access to the real-time market insights, news, discussion and much more! You can sign up using my unique link below 
 


 has invited you to join Stocktwits

Saudi Arabia is increasingly confident that Iran directly launched a complex missile &amp; drone attack from its southwestern territory on Saturday. The drones &amp; missiles appeared to have flown low to the ground, so that they weren&#39;t detected by Saudi radar or defense systems.

US admin quickly concluded that Iran launched cruise missiles &amp;  drones on Saturday. UK &amp; France, key US allies, say they have not seen evidence to support the allegations that Iran carried out the attacks.

US has taken the lead in providing security for the Persian Gulf monarchies for decades in part out of a strategy of protecting the world&#39;s oil supply.

Saudi Arabia&#39;s cabinet released a statement asking the international community for support in responding to the attack. Riyadh didn&#39;t mention Iran, though it has rejected claims of responsibility by Yemen&#39;s Iranian-back Houthi rebels.

US does not have mutual defense agreement with Saudi Arabia, therefore has no legal basis to attack Iran.

$USO $CL_F $XLE $XOP

StockTwits Web

Light, Sweet Crude Oil Futures

United States Oil Fund

Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund

SPDR Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF

Saudi Arabia is increasingly confident that Iran directly launched a complex missile & drone attack from its southwestern territory on Saturday. The drones & missiles appeared to have flown low to the ground, so that they weren't detected by Saudi radar or defense systems.

US admin quickly concluded that Iran launched cruise missiles &  drones on Saturday. UK & France, key US allies, say they have not seen evidence to support the allegations that Iran carried out the attacks.

US has taken the lead in providing security for the Persian Gulf monarchies for decades in part out of a strategy of protecting the world's oil supply.

Saudi Arabia's cabinet released a statement asking the international community for support in responding to the attack. Riyadh didn't mention Iran, though it has rejected claims of responsibility by Yemen's Iranian-back Houthi rebels.

US does not have mutual defense agreement with Saudi Arabia, therefore has no legal basis to attack Iran.



Amazon.com Inc

Netflix Inc

SPDR Gold Shares ETF

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF

Ro Patel

@Ro_Patel All the more reason to increase our oil production capacity and get in the habit of letting the House of Saud worry about themselves.   Especially if they keep making a habit of attacking Yemen.

Our Middle East policy should be what we should have done at end of WW2,
Let Russia and Germany go at it 🍿 
We can be behind the scenes with tech and support for our allies and freinenemies, and a-few special forces hit and runs.
Pretty sure that’s what Trump has been doing. 
No doubt Kerry and Obama administration has been advising Iran to get Trump to take an unpopular, war with Iran

StockTwits for iOS

CoastalHillbilly

 All the more reason to increase our oil production capacity and get in the habit of letting the House of Saud worry about themselves.   Especially if they keep making a habit of attacking Yemen.

Trump Media & Technology Group Corp.

US Dollar Index

Tell It Right

@Tell_It_Right Fair point, unfortunately, large GOP donors are a large part of the existing oil infrastructure in the US &amp; their continued support for the GOP is predicated on maintaining the status-quo.

There is little-to-no-reason why the Trump Admin is rolling back emission &amp; milage standards for autos and the Clean Air Act &amp; Clean Water Act other than as quid-pro-quo for their large donors. 

In 2001 under the Bush Admin, the NHTSA blocked Honda &amp; Toyota from installing stop-start tech in their vehicles. The tech (currently used in Europe) would have saved 4B gallons of gasoline/year and would have reduced air &amp; noise pollution. Further, the Bush Admin enacted the Energy Policy Act in 2005 - which has come to be known as the “Dick Cheney energy bill”. Cheney was CEO of Halliburton from 1995 until he left in 2000. 

The avg American drives 37 miles/day. Nissan Leaf has 200 mile range.

Therefore, the oil infrastructure will continue as long as voters continue to vote Republican.

Mark G

TraderDarren

Jon C

 Fair point, unfortunately, large GOP donors are a large part of the existing oil infrastructure in the US & their continued support for the GOP is predicated on maintaining the status-quo.

There is little-to-no-reason why the Trump Admin is rolling back emission & milage standards for autos and the Clean Air Act & Clean Water Act other than as quid-pro-quo for their large donors. 

In 2001 under the Bush Admin, the NHTSA blocked Honda & Toyota from installing stop-start tech in their vehicles. The tech (currently used in Europe) would have saved 4B gallons of gasoline/year and would have reduced air & noise pollution. Further, the Bush Admin enacted the Energy Policy Act in 2005 - which has come to be known as the “Dick Cheney energy bill”. Cheney was CEO of Halliburton from 1995 until he left in 2000. 

The avg American drives 37 miles/day. Nissan Leaf has 200 mile range.

Therefore, the oil infrastructure will continue as long as voters continue to vote Republican.

@Ro_Patel How is the electricity produced where you live?  And does your electrical grid handle the demand well?  Not poling fun at the Leaf or other EV&#39;s.  Just simply stating that in much of the country, driving an EV = driving a coal powered car.   That&#39;s fine if you want to do that (free market choices).  And maybe the electrical grid in your area can handle it if a major portion of drivers switched to EV&#39;s.  And maybe your power suppliers can magically generate more electricity without harming the environment.  (I personally believe solar has a lot of promise, at least in the south where we have 5 hours per day avg solar usable sunlight.  I&#39;ve even thought about powering my own home with 100% solar.)  Until that happens I&#39;m skeptical with pushing everybody to EV&#39;s.  And I certainly don&#39;t want to do it by force.

 How is the electricity produced where you live?  And does your electrical grid handle the demand well?  Not poling fun at the Leaf or other EV's.  Just simply stating that in much of the country, driving an EV = driving a coal powered car.   That's fine if you want to do that (free market choices).  And maybe the electrical grid in your area can handle it if a major portion of drivers switched to EV's.  And maybe your power suppliers can magically generate more electricity without harming the environment.  (I personally believe solar has a lot of promise, at least in the south where we have 5 hours per day avg solar usable sunlight.  I've even thought about powering my own home with 100% solar.)  Until that happens I'm skeptical with pushing everybody to EV's.  And I certainly don't want to do it by force.

@Tell_It_Right Sorry for the late reply. 

In order to live in a civilized society, one must accept some govt intervention in the market - it is simply good public policy - from time zones to labor &amp; discrimination laws to amount of chemicals in our water. Using your example of cars - the govt should not allow people to drive around in a tank or drive at any speed. There needs to be some sensible laws.

IMHO, it is incorrect to assert that 1970s oil shock was attributed to drilling restrictions in the US. The oil crisis was created when OPEC proclaimed an embargo to target nations that supported Israel during the Yom Kippur War (price of oil increased from $3/barrel to $12/barrel). Another shock occurred in 1979 after the Iranian Revolution (After Mossaddegh briefly nationalised the Iranian Oil Industry in 1952, the US/CIA orchestrated a coup d&#39;état in 1953 &amp; installed The Shah as their &quot;strongman&quot;).

For the next 20 years oil prices continued to drop.

Trevor Stafford

 Sorry for the late reply. 

In order to live in a civilized society, one must accept some govt intervention in the market - it is simply good public policy - from time zones to labor & discrimination laws to amount of chemicals in our water. Using your example of cars - the govt should not allow people to drive around in a tank or drive at any speed. There needs to be some sensible laws.

IMHO, it is incorrect to assert that 1970s oil shock was attributed to drilling restrictions in the US. The oil crisis was created when OPEC proclaimed an embargo to target nations that supported Israel during the Yom Kippur War (price of oil increased from $3/barrel to $12/barrel). Another shock occurred in 1979 after the Iranian Revolution (After Mossaddegh briefly nationalised the Iranian Oil Industry in 1952, the US/CIA orchestrated a coup d'état in 1953 & installed The Shah as their "strongman").

For the next 20 years oil prices continued to drop.

@Tell_It_Right So, why has the price of oil gone up since 2000 - China. China become a member of the WTO in 2001. Subsequently, emerging market demand continued to grow.

OPEC, a cartel, is the single most influential agency affecting the price of oil today.

 Further, I had mentioned the 2005 Energy Policy - w/n the policy, fracking is exempt from the Safe Water Act &amp; it strips the EPA from regulating the industry. The EPA shoulders very little blame for the price of oil.

As to the term &quot;free market&quot; - that does not exist outside of textbooks. Any law, rule, regulation, etc is a perversion to that idea. In order to have free/fair market, there can not be any asymmetry of information - and this is only possible when laws, rules, regulations, etc are enacted, therefore not a free market by definition.

 So, why has the price of oil gone up since 2000 - China. China become a member of the WTO in 2001. Subsequently, emerging market demand continued to grow.

OPEC, a cartel, is the single most influential agency affecting the price of oil today.

 Further, I had mentioned the 2005 Energy Policy - w/n the policy, fracking is exempt from the Safe Water Act & it strips the EPA from regulating the industry. The EPA shoulders very little blame for the price of oil.

As to the term "free market" - that does not exist outside of textbooks. Any law, rule, regulation, etc is a perversion to that idea. In order to have free/fair market, there can not be any asymmetry of information - and this is only possible when laws, rules, regulations, etc are enacted, therefore not a free market by definition.

@Ro_Patel  Wasn&#39;t fracking hardly done back in 2000?  Correct me if I&#39;m wrong, but didn&#39;t the number of fracking wells really pick up around 2014 or 2015?  If I&#39;m right, fracking would have had little impact on the price of oil, while China&#39;s demand does (on that we&#39;re very much in agreement). 
 
I&#39;m not saying we have a totally free market.  But surely you&#39;d agree that fracking has made the oil market much more of a free market than it was before fracking became a thing.  Surely you agree that the federal govt owning over 80% of the land in the state of Nevada, much of which is very oil rich, is very much a distortion on the oil market. 
 
I&#39;m not saying totally ditch the EPA or anything like that.  I&#39;m just saying appreciate how fracking has made oil on private land available to enter the market (since the government has tight control over the easy to access oil on public land).   Thing about all the benefits to society with people able to drive what they want.

  Wasn't fracking hardly done back in 2000?  Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the number of fracking wells really pick up around 2014 or 2015?  If I'm right, fracking would have had little impact on the price of oil, while China's demand does (on that we're very much in agreement). 
 
I'm not saying we have a totally free market.  But surely you'd agree that fracking has made the oil market much more of a free market than it was before fracking became a thing.  Surely you agree that the federal govt owning over 80% of the land in the state of Nevada, much of which is very oil rich, is very much a distortion on the oil market. 
 
I'm not saying totally ditch the EPA or anything like that.  I'm just saying appreciate how fracking has made oil on private land available to enter the market (since the government has tight control over the easy to access oil on public land).   Thing about all the benefits to society with people able to drive what they want.

@Ro_Patel Women have access to jobs they didn&#39;t otherwise have when cars were cheap enough for a family to buy two cars.  And don&#39;t overlook the cost in insurance, particularly the medical liability portion, that comes with everybody driving teeny go-carts relative to the cars I drove when I was young.  I&#39;m not saying force everybody to drive the kind of cars I like to drive (because I&#39;m not a my-way-or-the-highway kind of person).  I&#39;m just saying let those who are concerned about traffic fatalities buy the heavy car they want without CAFE fines punishing them for it.

 Women have access to jobs they didn't otherwise have when cars were cheap enough for a family to buy two cars.  And don't overlook the cost in insurance, particularly the medical liability portion, that comes with everybody driving teeny go-carts relative to the cars I drove when I was young.  I'm not saying force everybody to drive the kind of cars I like to drive (because I'm not a my-way-or-the-highway kind of person).  I'm just saying let those who are concerned about traffic fatalities buy the heavy car they want without CAFE fines punishing them for it.

@Tell_It_Right Fracking began in the 1950s, if I&#39;m not mistaken. In Western Canada, we started in the 1970s. You are correct that massive hydraulic fracturing projects began in 2010. In 2000, there were about 276,000 natural gas wells in the US. But by 2010, that number had almost doubled to 510,000. And every year, about 13,000 new wells are drilled.

Fracking does not in itself make the market more free - it simply adds to the supply of oil. When that supply is in excess of the demand, the price will subsequently fall. However, when that supply is disrupted by OPEC, then the oil price will increase.  In addition, untapped reserves do not distort the oil market - only the current supply &amp; demand. We are currently swimming in oil. We have over 50+ years of oil left on the planet.

 Fracking began in the 1950s, if I'm not mistaken. In Western Canada, we started in the 1970s. You are correct that massive hydraulic fracturing projects began in 2010. In 2000, there were about 276,000 natural gas wells in the US. But by 2010, that number had almost doubled to 510,000. And every year, about 13,000 new wells are drilled.

Fracking does not in itself make the market more free - it simply adds to the supply of oil. When that supply is in excess of the demand, the price will subsequently fall. However, when that supply is disrupted by OPEC, then the oil price will increase.  In addition, untapped reserves do not distort the oil market - only the current supply & demand. We are currently swimming in oil. We have over 50+ years of oil left on the planet.

@Ro_Patel @Tell_It_Right.  Let me tell you this.  Car makers are wayyy behind the times on the enginering of making anything reliable for long term use.  Do Not buy anything first gen.  Who wants to spend 25 or 30k on a hybrid thats gonna play out after 100k miles.  Turn around buy another or spend 7k in repairs.  My gas and diesel hogs that will trek 300k or 400k are well worth spending the extra $5 or $10 dollars every fill up a week then buying modern junk thats gonna save pennies a week...

StockTwits For Android 

.  Let me tell you this.  Car makers are wayyy behind the times on the enginering of making anything reliable for long term use.  Do Not buy anything first gen.  Who wants to spend 25 or 30k on a hybrid thats gonna play out after 100k miles.  Turn around buy another or spend 7k in repairs.  My gas and diesel hogs that will trek 300k or 400k are well worth spending the extra $5 or $10 dollars every fill up a week then buying modern junk thats gonna save pennies a week...

Fastly Inc

Steven Marek

@Tell_It_Right There was a paper I read, maybe 10 years ago, about auto fatalities and the size of vehicles. It was posited that having multiple size &amp; weight of autos contribute to increased fatality rates. Without regulation, bumper heights on vehicles do not match up. Further, the notion that bigger is better is creating a war on size/weight of autos on the road. It was an interesting paper - imagine if we all drove around in golf carts...how fun would that be!! I understand that a car is an extension of the drivers personality &amp; that one does not want to limit a person&#39;s choice but can you honestly say that CAFE standards limited and/or added a significant cost to the purchase of a vehicle. Shouldn&#39;t we be striving to use less gas/oil. The same argument was used when heating oil was getting phased out - govt/insurance companies limiting choice...really...really...no one dies of exposure &amp; we are doing fine with nat gas/electric heat.

 There was a paper I read, maybe 10 years ago, about auto fatalities and the size of vehicles. It was posited that having multiple size & weight of autos contribute to increased fatality rates. Without regulation, bumper heights on vehicles do not match up. Further, the notion that bigger is better is creating a war on size/weight of autos on the road. It was an interesting paper - imagine if we all drove around in golf carts...how fun would that be!! I understand that a car is an extension of the drivers personality & that one does not want to limit a person's choice but can you honestly say that CAFE standards limited and/or added a significant cost to the purchase of a vehicle. Shouldn't we be striving to use less gas/oil. The same argument was used when heating oil was getting phased out - govt/insurance companies limiting choice...really...really...no one dies of exposure & we are doing fine with nat gas/electric heat.

@Ro_Patel @Tell_It_Right u know what leads to more fatalities. Dumb people behind a wheel.  MOBILE PHONES

Yep dirty. rotten humans are piss poor drivers, drowsy driving is responsible for more accidents than drunk driving, phones likely worse too

 u know what leads to more fatalities. Dumb people behind a wheel.  MOBILE PHONES