FTT logo

FTT
FTX Token

2,943
Mkt Cap
$0.00
24H Volume
$2.94M
FDV
$94.9M
Circ Supply
0.00
Total Supply
328.9M
FTT Fundamentals
Max Supply
328.9M
7D High
$0.2952
7D Low
$0.2725
24H High
$0.2964
24H Low
$0.2871
All-Time High
$84.18
All-Time Low
$0.2669
FTT Prices
FTT / USD
$0.2885
FTT / EUR
€0.2513
FTT / GBP
£0.2171
FTT / CAD
CA$0.3951
FTT / AUD
A$0.4081
FTT / INR
₹26.66
FTT / NGN
NGN 395.82
FTT / NZD
NZ$0.4956
FTT / PHP
₱17.26
FTT / SGD
SGD 0.369
FTT / ZAR
ZAR 4.84
Loading...
Loading...
News
all
press releases
FTX Collapse: SBF’s Shocking Claim of Spot Trade Liquidity Resurfaces Old Wounds
BitcoinWorld FTX Collapse: SBF’s Shocking Claim of Spot Trade Liquidity Resurfaces Old Wounds In a development that has reignited debate within the cryptocurrency community, incarcerated FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried has made a startling claim about the exchange’s final hours, asserting it maintained sufficient liquidity to cover all spot trades at the moment of its catastrophic collapse on November 11, 2022. This assertion, communicated via the social media platform X through an intermediary, directly challenges the prevailing narrative of FTX’s instantaneous liquidity crisis and adds a new layer of complexity to the ongoing bankruptcy proceedings and regulatory investigations. The claim forces a re-examination of the exchange’s internal financial mechanics during its death spiral, particularly the relationship between its spot trading operations and its more leveraged products. FTX Collapse: Deconstructing SBF’s Liquidity Claim Sam Bankman-Fried’s recent statement presents a specific and technical argument about the nature of FTX’s insolvency. He contends that the platform held enough liquid assets to satisfy all customer requests for spot withdrawals—the simple buying and selling of cryptocurrencies for immediate delivery. However, he immediately qualifies this by noting that a significant majority of assets were not sitting idle but were actively deployed within margin and lending programs. These programs, according to his explanation, allowed users—including the affiliated trading firm Alameda Research—to engage in margin trading by tapping into a shared collateral pool. Consequently, SBF argues that while spot liabilities were technically coverable, the overall structure was not “100% liquid,” a condition he claims is impossible for any exchange offering leveraged products. This distinction between theoretical spot liquidity and operational illiquidity due to intermingled funds lies at the heart of his defense and the prosecution’s fraud case. Financial experts analyzing this claim highlight several critical points. First, the assertion hinges on a narrow definition of “spot trades,” isolating them from the broader ecosystem of liabilities. Second, the admission that assets were funneled into a shared pool for Alameda’s use corroborates previous allegations of commingled funds. Third, the argument that no margin-enabled exchange is fully liquid is technically accurate but sidesteps the scale of the shortfall at FTX. The exchange’s bankruptcy filings revealed a deficit exceeding $8 billion between customer liabilities and available assets, a gap far beyond normal operational buffers. This context transforms SBF’s statement from a mere technical clarification into a potentially significant legal point regarding intent and mismanagement. The Timeline and Context of the November 2022 Implosion To fully assess this new claim, one must revisit the frantic sequence of events in early November 2022. The crisis began on November 2, when CoinDesk published a report revealing that much of Alameda Research’s balance sheet consisted of FTX’s proprietary token, FTT. This report triggered widespread concern about the financial entanglement between the two entities. Subsequently, on November 6, Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao announced his exchange would liquidate its substantial FTT holdings, precipitating a classic bank run on FTX. Over the next four days, customers attempted to withdraw approximately $6 billion from the platform, overwhelming its systems and exposing its inability to meet these obligations. By November 11, FTX, along with Alameda and over 130 affiliated entities, had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Delaware. The bankruptcy administrators, led by CEO John J. Ray III, have since described the corporate governance at FTX as a complete failure. They found no reliable financial records, inadequate cybersecurity, and a stunning lack of corporate controls. Ray’s team has consistently framed the collapse as a result of a “complete absence of trustworthy financial information” and the misuse of customer funds. SBF’s new claim about spot liquidity exists in direct tension with this official narrative, suggesting a more nuanced—though not necessarily exculpatory—picture of the exchange’s final days. It implies that the insolvency may have been driven more by a crisis of confidence and a run on leveraged positions than by a pure absence of assets for basic spot redemptions. Expert Analysis: Liquidity Versus Solvency Financial and legal professionals emphasize the crucial distinction between liquidity and solvency, a difference that is central to understanding SBF’s statement. Liquidity refers to the ability to meet short-term obligations with available cash or cash-equivalent assets. Solvency , conversely, refers to whether an entity’s total assets exceed its total liabilities. An entity can be solvent but illiquid (unable to access assets quickly to pay debts) or liquid but insolvent (has cash but owes more than it owns). The Core Argument: SBF’s claim suggests FTX may have faced a severe liquidity crunch—its assets were locked in loans and margin positions—rather than outright insolvency at the exact moment of the collapse. However, the subsequent bankruptcy revealed profound insolvency. The Legal Ramification: Prosecutors successfully argued that the commingling of funds and misuse of customer deposits for risky ventures constituted fraud. The liquidity argument does not address the fundamental breach of trust in using customer assets for purposes other than their intended safekeeping. The Industry Norm: While it is true that exchanges engaging in lending are never 100% liquid, industry best practice involves maintaining substantial reserves and clear segregation between customer funds and operational capital, standards FTX demonstrably failed to meet. This expert perspective clarifies that even if the narrow spot-liquidity claim holds a grain of truth, it does not absolve FTX’s leadership of the catastrophic risk management and fiduciary failures that doomed the exchange. The claim instead reframes the mechanism of the collapse, not its fundamental causes. The Impact on Creditors and the Bankruptcy Process The ongoing bankruptcy proceedings aim to recover and redistribute assets to FTX’s millions of creditors worldwide. SBF’s assertion, while unlikely to alter the legal outcome of his conviction, could influence certain creditor negotiations and public perception. The bankruptcy estate, under John Ray, has made significant progress in recovering assets, including through the liquidation of crypto holdings and settlements with various parties. The estate’s current plan proposes repaying creditors based on the value of their assets in November 2022, a point in time that SBF’s statement now indirectly addresses. If his claim were to be interpreted as suggesting more value was theoretically accessible at the moment of collapse, it could fuel discontent among creditors hoping for a higher recovery rate. However, legal analysts note that the practical reality of the bankruptcy—driven by the actual assets recovered, not theoretical snapshots—remains unchanged. The statement’s primary impact is therefore rhetorical, serving to shape the historical narrative of the collapse rather than its financial resolution. It also ensures the FTX saga remains in public discourse, potentially affecting regulatory momentum and investor psychology in the broader crypto market. Conclusion Sam Bankman-Fried’s claim regarding FTX’s spot trade liquidity during its collapse adds a contentious postscript to one of the largest financial failures in cryptocurrency history. While the statement introduces a technical argument about the exchange’s operational state, it does not contradict the established findings of massive fraud, gross mismanagement, and the violation of core fiduciary duties. The FTX collapse serves as a stark, enduring lesson on the perils of opaque financial structures, the absence of regulatory oversight, and the catastrophic consequences of commingling customer funds. As the bankruptcy process continues and the industry evolves, this latest claim ensures that the complex story of the FTX collapse, and the questions it raises about exchange liquidity and solvency, will remain a critical reference point for years to come. FAQs Q1: What exactly is Sam Bankman-Fried claiming about FTX’s liquidity? He claims that at the precise moment of FTX’s bankruptcy filing on November 11, 2022, the exchange held enough liquid assets to cover all customer spot trades. He clarifies that most assets were tied up in margin and lending programs, making the overall system illiquid but suggesting the core spot trading book was theoretically covered. Q2: Does SBF’s claim mean FTX was not insolvent? No. The claim addresses a specific type of liquidity (for spot trades) at a specific moment. The subsequent bankruptcy proceedings revealed FTX was profoundly insolvent, with a multi-billion dollar gap between its assets and liabilities. Liquidity and solvency are different financial concepts. Q3: How is SBF communicating from prison? According to reports, he is posting statements on the social media platform X through an acquaintance or intermediary who has access to his account. All communications are subject to monitoring by prison authorities. Q4: Could this claim affect the bankruptcy repayments to FTX customers? It is highly unlikely to change the practical outcome. The bankruptcy estate’s repayment plan is based on the actual assets recovered by the administration team, not on theoretical claims about liquidity at a past snapshot in time. The legal process is governed by filed claims and recovered funds. Q5: What is the difference between spot trading and margin trading on an exchange? Spot trading involves the immediate purchase or sale of a cryptocurrency for immediate settlement. Margin trading allows users to borrow funds (leverage) to trade larger positions than their capital would allow, using existing assets as collateral. SBF’s claim centers on assets being used to back these margin loans instead of being held for spot redemptions. This post FTX Collapse: SBF’s Shocking Claim of Spot Trade Liquidity Resurfaces Old Wounds first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
bitcoinworld·4d ago
News Placeholder
More News
News Placeholder
SBF's New Lawsuit Request: Government to Respond by March 11
US government to respond to SBF's new trial request by March 11. Bankman-Fried, who received 25 years in prison after FTX collapse, appeal ongoing. FTT at $0.32, down -5%, RSI 39 in downtrend. Supp...
coinotag·19d ago
News Placeholder
Bitcoin holds as White House rules out SBF pardon
White House reiterates Trump will not pardon Sam Bankman-Fried, prompting legal experts to outline presidential pardon powers and implications for FTX victims. Read original article on defiliban.com
Defiliban·21d ago
News Placeholder
Convicted FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried Breaks Silence On ‘10 Myths’
Sam Bankman-Fried has once again taken to social media from prison, laying out what he describes as “10 myths” surrounding the collapse of crypto exchange FTX and his subsequent conviction. The former chief executive used the statement to challenge prosecutors, the bankruptcy process, media coverage, and even the conduct of his trial. Sam Bankman-Fried Denies FTX Insolvency Bankman-Fried began by disputing the allegation that FTX was insolvent and that $8 billion in customer funds vanished. He contrasted statements made by prosecutors to jurors with representations made by bankruptcy debtors to the court, and that his claim of solvency was false and that he had lost billions in customer money. Media reports, he said, reinforced the message that the funds were gone. In his version of events, however, FTX was solvent and is now repaying customers between 119% and 143% of their claims. Bankman-Fried also rejected persistent rumors about a lavish corporate culture. Addressing allegations of “polycule orgies,” Bankman-Fried flatly denied that such conduct took place. He insisted he did not party or take vacations, noting that while FTX owned a penthouse, he personally rented only 10% of it for six months for $50,000. He maintained that his personal spending and political donations were funded from his earnings and were less than those earnings. Secret ‘Backdoor’ For Alameda On the events leading to FTX’s bankruptcy, Bankman-Fried pushed back against the narrative that he filed because he could not meet surging withdrawal demands. According to him, there were offers to cover the liquidity shortfall and stabilize the platform. He claimed that within three days, financing proposals were on the table and withdrawals had begun to resume, but that lawyers nonetheless proceeded with the bankruptcy filing. The former FTX CEO also addressed the structure of the exchange’s trading platform, Alameda Research , saying it was unrealistic to expect a margin exchange to be fully liquid at all times. Margin trading, he explained, involves customers — including Alameda Research — opting into lending and borrowing through a shared collateral pool. He asserted that most assets on the exchange were part of this lending program and that FTX had sufficient liquidity to cover assets outside of it. Another key accusation he disputed was that he created a secret “backdoor” in FTX’s systems to siphon funds to Alameda. Bankman-Fried denied that such a mechanism existed, saying the account features in question had legitimate purposes and were not used to allow Alameda to borrow more from customers than it had lent. Pardon Hopes Fade A significant portion of his statement focused on his trial. Bankman-Fried claimed he did not receive a fair hearing, arguing that once the Department of Justice (DOJ) under former President Joe Biden and the bankruptcy debtors took control of FTX, they controlled the narrative, access to documents, and the pool of witnesses. Bankman-Fried also accused Judge Lewis Kaplan of restricting his ability to defend himself, including imposing a gag order, revoking his bail before trial, excluding evidence related to FTX’s solvency, and advice of counsel. Regarding the revocation of his bail, Bankman-Fried maintained that it stemmed from his exercise of First Amendment rights and attempts to assist the bankruptcy debtors, rather than from witness intimidation. The statement comes as Bankman-Fried continues to pursue a new trial in New York. Speculation that he might receive a presidential pardon from President Donald Trump — similar to the one granted to former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao — has largely faded. Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com
bitcoinist·24d ago
News Placeholder
SBF Shakes FTX Trial with New Evidence: FTT Analysis
SBF submitted a new witness statement from prison accusing the DOJ: Former FTX employee Chapsky claims the company was solvent. FTT in downtrend at $0.33, S1 $0.3305 strong support. Legal developme...
coinotag·1mo ago
News Placeholder
FTX Founder Sam Bankman‑Fried Pushes For New Trial In New York
Sam Bankman‑Fried, the co-founder and former chief executive of collapsed cryptocurrency exchange FTX, has filed a request for a new trial in New York on Tuesday, arguing that fresh witness testimony could undermine the government’s case against him. Bid To Revive FTX Trial As reported by Bloomberg, the motion, dated February 5 and entered into the docket on Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, was submitted pro se, meaning Bankman‑Fried is acting on his own behalf rather than through legal counsel. In the filing, Bankman‑Fried contends that testimony from new witnesses could challenge key aspects of the prosecution’s narrative and potentially cast doubt on the verdict. He argues that this evidence was not previously presented and could materially affect the outcome of the case. The motion does not replace his ongoing appeal but represents an additional attempt to reopen the proceedings. The request follows comments Bankman‑Fried made earlier on Tuesday on social media in which he again disputed the legitimacy of FTX’s bankruptcy. Bankman‑Fried Denies Insolvency Issues From prison, he has increasingly advanced the argument that the company’s collapse was driven by legal and financial maneuvering rather than criminal wrongdoing. He claimed that FTX was not insolvent and said he never authorized a bankruptcy filing, alleging instead that lawyers assumed control of the company and quickly initiated bankruptcy proceedings for their own financial benefit. Bankman‑Fried was convicted on all seven counts he faced, including fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering, in the case United States v. Bankman‑Fried. On March 28, 2024, the court sentenced him to 25 years in federal prison and ordered him to forfeit approximately $11 billion, reflecting the scale of losses tied to the collapse of FTX. Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com
bitcoinist·1mo ago
News Placeholder
Convicted FTX CEO SBF Cries ‘Biden Lawfare’ In Trump Pardon Pitch
Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) used a new X thread on Feb. 9 to reframe his criminal case as “Biden’s political lawfare,” positioning himself alongside Donald Trump and former FTX executive Ryan Salame in what read like a direct appeal for a future pardon. “Biden’s lawfare machine threw bogus charges at me, Donald Trump, Ryan Salame , etc.,” Bankman-Fried wrote . “To make the charges stick, they prevented us from even being allowed to respond.” He opened with a blunt claim about process rather than facts: “Rule No. 1 of Biden’s political lawfare: Don’t let them present evidence.” SBF Cries ‘Gagged Trial,’ Claims DOJ Hid Evidence SBF’s argument hinges on the idea that authorities and the court curtailed what the jury could hear. He repeatedly singled out Judge Lewis Kaplan, who presided over his trial, claiming the court “rubber-stamped everything Biden’s DOJ wanted” and “made sure I couldn’t show the jury the truth.” The “truth,” as SBF cast it, is a solvency narrative: “So they lied, said I stole billions of dollars and bankrupted FTX. But the money was always there and FTX was always solvent.” He also argued that restrictions prevented him from advancing that line at trial, writing that he was “prohibited” from “pointing out FTX was solvent ” and from “even mentioning lawyers.” In the thread, SBF linked to a court filing he said was authored by his prosecutor, “Sassoon,” describing it as “a 70-page document on all the evidence they didn’t want the jury to see,” and he framed the episode as part of a broader political effort to “silence the truth.” A significant chunk of the thread is dedicated to Trump’s New York hush-money bookkeeping case, which Bankman-Fried portrayed as a routine classification dispute blown into criminality. “Charged him with 34 crimes over his bookkeeping of an NDA expense—should it be legal, campaign, or personal?,” he wrote. “These questions come up all the time when you’re running a business, and it’s often unclear.” He then drew a parallel between court-imposed limits on Trump and his own pre-trial detention. “They then got the judge to impose a gag order on Donald Trump,” he wrote. “Biden’s DOJ silenced me, too—getting Judge Kaplan to gag and then jail me before trial. President Trump also had Kaplan as a judge.” Bankman-Fried also amplified Salame’s complaints about licensing advice and charging decisions, alleging prosecutors leaned on pressure tactics to force a plea, including claims involving Salame’s fiancée, assertions presented as fact in the thread but not accompanied by supporting documentation beyond links to Salame’s posts. The reaction underneath was unsparing, with multiple industry figures interpreting the thread less as a legal critique than a political pitch. “You’re a Delusional criminal who is now angling for a pardon,” wrote trader Bob Loukas. Attorney Ariel Givner was even more direct: “We GET it. You want a pardon from Trump .” At press time, FTT traded at $0.3021.
bitcoinist·1mo ago
News Placeholder
Backpack Token TGE Reveals Ambitious 25% Supply Unlock Strategy for Community Rewards
BitcoinWorld Backpack Token TGE Reveals Ambitious 25% Supply Unlock Strategy for Community Rewards In a significant development for cryptocurrency exchange tokens, Backpack has announced a substantial 25% token supply unlock at its upcoming Token Generation Event, marking a pivotal moment for exchange-based digital assets and their community distribution models. The exchange revealed this strategic allocation through its official communication channels, detailing specific percentages for different user groups within its ecosystem. This announcement comes during a period of increased regulatory scrutiny and evolving market expectations for transparent token distribution practices across the cryptocurrency industry. Backpack Token TGE Strategy and Initial Allocation Breakdown Backpack’s approach to its Token Generation Event represents a deliberate departure from conventional exchange token launches. The company will release 25% of its total token supply immediately at the TGE, a percentage that industry analysts note is substantially higher than typical initial circulating supplies. According to the announcement, this initial allocation divides into two primary categories: 24% for points holders and 1% for holders of Mad Lads NFTs. This distribution model emphasizes rewarding existing platform participants rather than reserving large portions for private investors or team allocations. The cryptocurrency exchange has not yet disclosed the exact launch date for its token, maintaining anticipation within the community. CEO Armani Ferrante explained that Backpack will reveal its complete tokenomics in stages as the TGE approaches. This phased disclosure strategy allows for community feedback and market adaptation. Ferrante emphasized that the token will distinguish itself from existing exchange tokens through unique distribution mechanisms, utility features, and functional applications. He even suggested the token might require a completely new naming convention to reflect its innovative characteristics. Comparative Analysis of Exchange Token Distribution Models To understand Backpack’s approach, we must examine how other major exchanges have structured their token launches. The table below illustrates key differences in initial circulating supply percentages across prominent exchange tokens: Exchange Token Initial Circulating Supply Primary Allocation Year of Launch Backpack Token 25% Community Rewards 2025 (Upcoming) Binance Coin (BNB) Approximately 10% ICO Participants 2017 FTX Token (FTT) Approximately 7% Private Sale 2019 Crypto.com Token (CRO) Approximately 15% Public Sale 2018 KuCoin Token (KCS) Approximately 8% Public Sale 2017 This comparative data reveals Backpack’s more aggressive initial distribution strategy. The exchange appears focused on achieving wider token dispersion from the outset. Industry experts note that higher initial circulating supplies can potentially reduce sell pressure from future unlocks, though they also present immediate liquidity challenges. The emphasis on points holders suggests Backpack prioritizes rewarding active platform users over speculative investors. Points System Integration and Community Reward Mechanisms Backpack’s allocation of 24% to points holders represents a sophisticated loyalty program integration. The exchange has operated a points system that tracks user activity, trading volume, and platform engagement. This system now serves as the primary distribution mechanism for the majority of initial tokens. Such an approach aligns with broader industry trends toward activity-based rewards rather than simple purchase-based allocations. The points-to-token conversion mechanism remains unspecified, but cryptocurrency analysts anticipate several potential models: Proportional Distribution: Tokens allocated based on points accumulated relative to total points across all users Tiered Rewards: Different conversion rates for various points thresholds or user levels Time-Weighted Points: Greater weight given to points earned during specific periods or through particular activities Multiplier Systems: Bonus tokens for users who maintain points above certain minimums or achieve specific milestones This focus on existing users creates immediate utility for the token within Backpack’s ecosystem. Furthermore, it establishes a foundation for network effects as token holders naturally become more engaged platform participants. The strategy demonstrates an understanding of token economics that prioritizes organic adoption over speculative trading patterns. Mad Lads NFT Integration and Digital Collectible Synergy The allocation of 1% to Mad Lads NFT holders represents a strategic bridge between digital collectibles and exchange utility tokens. Mad Lads, a Solana-based NFT collection, has established significant cultural cachet within the cryptocurrency community. This allocation creates several important synergies: Cross-Community Engagement: Bringing NFT collectors into the exchange ecosystem Cultural Alignment: Leveraging existing community strength and brand recognition Utility Expansion: Providing additional functionality and value to NFT holdings Innovation Signaling: Demonstrating Backpack’s commitment to integrating diverse crypto-native assets This approach follows successful precedents where NFT holdings granted access to token airdrops or special allocations. However, Backpack’s explicit percentage allocation provides greater transparency than many previous implementations. The fixed 1% allocation ensures predictability for both NFT holders and points participants, reducing uncertainty about dilution effects. Tokenomics Philosophy and Industry Context Armani Ferrante’s comments about the token requiring “a new name” suggest fundamental innovation in token design. Traditional exchange tokens typically serve several standard functions: trading fee discounts, staking rewards, participation in token sales, and governance rights. Backpack appears to be developing additional or alternative utilities that might include: Enhanced Security Features: Token-based authentication or withdrawal verification Advanced Trading Tools: Access to proprietary analytics or execution algorithms Cross-Platform Integration: Utility across multiple Backpack products or partner services Novel Governance Models: Innovative voting mechanisms or proposal systems The cryptocurrency industry has evolved significantly since the first exchange token launches. Regulatory developments, particularly regarding securities classification, have influenced token design. Additionally, market maturity has created demand for tokens with genuine utility rather than purely speculative value. Backpack’s staged tokenomics reveal suggests careful consideration of these evolving factors. Industry analysts note that successful exchange tokens typically balance several competing priorities: User Incentives: Rewarding platform engagement and loyalty Ecosystem Growth: Funding development and expansion Value Accrual: Creating sustainable token appreciation mechanisms Regulatory Compliance: Adhering to evolving legal frameworks across jurisdictions Market Stability: Avoiding excessive volatility from concentrated holdings or sudden unlocks Backpack’s initial allocation strategy addresses the first priority directly while establishing foundations for the others. The substantial community allocation reduces concentration risk, while the NFT integration creates cultural momentum. The remaining 75% of tokens will presumably follow unlock schedules that support long-term ecosystem development. Market Implications and Future Developments The announcement arrives during a period of renewed interest in exchange tokens as cryptocurrency markets demonstrate recovery from previous downturns. Several factors make Backpack’s timing strategically significant: Regulatory Clarity: Increasing definition around what constitutes compliant token offerings Infrastructure Maturation: More sophisticated tools for managing token economics and distributions Community Expectations: Higher standards for transparency and fair distribution Competitive Landscape: Need to differentiate from established exchange tokens with novel features The cryptocurrency industry continues evolving toward more sophisticated token models that balance incentive alignment, regulatory compliance, and sustainable economics. Backpack’s approach appears designed for this mature environment rather than replicating earlier, simpler models. The emphasis on existing users through points and NFT allocations suggests recognition that organic adoption drives longer-term success than speculative interest alone. As the TGE approaches, several key developments will merit attention: The specific conversion mechanism for points to tokens The unlock schedule for the remaining 75% of tokens Additional utility features beyond standard exchange token functions Governance structures and community participation mechanisms Integration with Backpack’s existing and planned product offerings These elements will determine whether Backpack’s token achieves its potential as a distinctive addition to the exchange token landscape. The company’s commitment to phased disclosure suggests careful planning and responsiveness to community feedback during the final development stages. Conclusion Backpack’s Token Generation Event strategy represents a thoughtful approach to exchange token design in an evolving cryptocurrency landscape. The decision to unlock 25% of supply at launch, with overwhelming emphasis on rewarding existing community members through points and NFT allocations, demonstrates commitment to user-centric distribution. This Backpack token TGE approach contrasts with earlier exchange token models that prioritized fundraising over community building. As the company reveals additional tokenomics details in coming weeks, the industry will gain clearer understanding of how this token might redefine utility and value accrual for exchange-based digital assets. The integration of Mad Lads NFTs further illustrates innovative thinking about cross-community engagement in cryptocurrency ecosystems. FAQs Q1: What percentage of Backpack’s token supply will unlock at the Token Generation Event? Backpack will unlock 25% of its total token supply at the upcoming Token Generation Event. This initial circulating supply represents a significant portion compared to many previous exchange token launches. Q2: How will the initial token allocation be distributed among different groups? The allocation divides into two primary categories: 24% for points holders and 1% for Mad Lads NFT owners. This distribution emphasizes rewarding existing community members rather than reserving large portions for private investors. Q3: What is the significance of allocating tokens to Mad Lads NFT holders? This allocation creates synergy between digital collectibles and utility tokens, bringing NFT communities into the exchange ecosystem. It also provides additional utility to NFT holdings while leveraging existing cultural momentum within the cryptocurrency space. Q4: When will Backpack launch its token? The exchange has not yet disclosed the exact launch date for its token. CEO Armani Ferrante indicated that Backpack will reveal its complete tokenomics in stages as the Token Generation Event approaches. Q5: How does Backpack’s token distribution compare to other exchange tokens? Backpack’s 25% initial circulating supply is substantially higher than typical exchange token launches, which often range from 7-15%. This suggests greater emphasis on immediate community distribution rather than extended unlock schedules that can create future sell pressure. This post Backpack Token TGE Reveals Ambitious 25% Supply Unlock Strategy for Community Rewards first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
bitcoinworld·2mo ago
News Placeholder
Former Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison released from federal custody
The former CEO of Alameda Research, Caroline Ellison, was released from federal prison on Wednesday after completing her federal supervision. Court documents revealed that she has been moved from federal prison to the post-release supervision phase. Ellison had settled an agreement with regulators the previous year after being transferred from a Connecticut prison to home confinement in October. She is also required to comply with multiple post-sentence regulatory restrictions after completing her sentence. SEC bars Ellison from holding any executive positions for 10 years THE $571 MILLION PER MONTH DISCOUNT Caroline Ellison helped vaporize $8 billion. She’s walking free January 21st. Time served: 14 months. That’s $571 million in customer losses per month of custody. Here is the math that should terrify every white-collar defendant in… pic.twitter.com/WxDH12lTCc — Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ (@shanaka86) December 26, 2025 The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued a 10-year prohibition against Ellison serving in any executive positions at any digital asset exchange or any publicly traded firm. The prohibition follows her involvement in legal proceedings related to her previous roles at the defunct FTX crypto company. Other executives, including Zixiao Wang, former CTO of FTX Trading, and Nishad Singh, former Co-Head of engineering at FTX, both agreed on a settlement with the SEC. They have also been prohibited from being officers or directors of any public company for several years. An SEC document filed in December in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York revealed that Ellison agreed to a 10-year officer-and-director bar. Wang and Singh both agreed to an eight-year bar. The filing also indicated that Ellison, Wang, and Singh agreed to the Commission’s antifraud allegations and to a 5-year conduct-based injunction. Ellison’s release comes 10 months earlier than her full sentence of two years, which began in November 2024. She pleaded guilty in December 2022 to fraud and conspiracy charges linked to FTX. The former executive was sentenced in September 2024, and U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan ordered her to forfeit $11 billion. Ellison’s early release follows her good conduct in prison, where she is said to have cooperated with authorities investigating FTX. She had previously testified against FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, which led to a 25-year conviction in federal prison. CEO of the FTX bankruptcy estate, John J-Ray III, acknowledged that Ellison has provided the debtors with valuable assistance and cooperation. He also revealed that her cooperation led to the recovery of hundreds of millions of dollars for the Debtor, benefiting creditors. SEC orders Sam Bankman-Fried to remain in federal prison Ellison’s release marks the final stage in the legal process involving the FTX and Alameda Research executives involved in the 2022 collapse of the digital asset exchange. Bankman-Fried had appealed in November that his fraud conviction and 25-year prison sentence should be scrapped due to an unfair trial. A three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan found Bankman-Fried guilty of seven charges in the 2023 FTX case. The court issued a notice for the former FTX CEO to remain in federal prison on fraud charges. The judges agreed that the evidence presented at trial, including witness testimony and troves of FTX documents, proved the former executive’s guilt. Cryptopolitan also previously reported that U.S. President Donald Trump revealed earlier this year that he has no intentions of pardoning Bankman-Fried. Investigations revealed that FTX Co-Founder Sam Bankman-Fried operated a scheme that manipulated the price of the firm’s security token, FTT, by purchasing large quantities on the open market to prop up its price. The SEC also revealed that the crypto hedge fund owned by Wang and Bankman-Fried and run by Ellison used FTT as collateral for undisclosed loans. The initiative allegedly caused Alameda’s balance sheet to be overstated, misleading investors about the company’s risk exposure. Ellison and Wang were tied to the scheme as active participants trying to deceive FTX’s investors. Wang was accused of developing the FTX software code that allowed Alameda to divert customer funds. Ellison was accused of misappropriating FTX funds for Alameda’s trading activities. Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.
cryptopolitan·2mo ago
News Placeholder
FTT Surges Sharply From Support as Traders Eye 50% Move
FTT Token has surged 17% in a single day after rebounding from a long-standing support level. This move is attracting attention from traders anticipating a breakout similar to recent LUNA and LUNC rallies. FTT Price Rebounds Sharply From Falling Wedge Support FTX Token (FTT) reco...
CoinCryptoNews·3mo ago
<
1
2
...
>

Sentiment

Indicates whether most users posting on a symbol’s stream over the last 24 hours are fearful or greedy.
0
25
50
75
100
Extreme
Fear
Neutral
Greed
Extreme
Fear
Greed
N/A
Last score

N/A

1 day ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 week ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 month ago

Sign Up / Log In

3 months ago

Sign Up / Log In

6 months ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 year ago

Sign Up / Log In

Message Volume

Measures the total amount of chatter on a stream over the last 24 hours.
0
25
50
75
100
Extremely
Low
Normal
High
Extremely
Low
High
N/A
Last score

N/A

1 day ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 week ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 month ago

Sign Up / Log In

3 months ago

Sign Up / Log In

6 months ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 year ago

Sign Up / Log In

Participation Ratio

Measures the number of unique accounts posting on a stream relative to the number of total messages on that stream.
0
25
50
75
100
Extremely
Low
Normal
High
Extremely
Low
High
N/A
Last score

N/A

1 day ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 week ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 month ago

Sign Up / Log In

3 months ago

Sign Up / Log In

6 months ago

Sign Up / Log In

1 year ago

Sign Up / Log In

AboutNo company description
Details
Links
Source
Categories
Alameda Research PortfolioAlleged SEC SecuritiesCentralized Exchange (CEX) TokenCircle Ventures PortfolioCoinbase Ventures PortfolioEnergi EcosystemEthereum EcosystemExchange-based TokensFTX HoldingsMulticoin Capital PortfolioPantera Capital PortfolioParadigm PortfolioSequoia Capital PortfolioSolana EcosystemSora EcosystemViction EcosystemYZi Labs (Prev. Binance Labs) Portfolio
Date
Market Cap
Volume
Close
March 17, 2026
$0.00
$2.94M
---
March 17, 2026
$0.00
$2.89M
---
March 16, 2026
$0.00
$2.28M
$0.2829
March 15, 2026
$0.00
$2.07M
$0.2816
March 14, 2026
$0.00
$3.42M
$0.2784
March 13, 2026
$0.00
$2.49M
$0.2807
March 12, 2026
$0.00
$2.67M
$0.2782
March 11, 2026
$0.00
$2.02M
$0.2759
March 10, 2026
$0.00
$3M
$0.2756
March 09, 2026
$0.00
$2.65M
$0.2706

Poll

Which crypto narrative wins the next cycle?
Bitcoin dominance
Ethereum ecosystem
Solana speed & apps
AI & agent tokens

Latest FTT News

Top Discussions

Advertisement|Remove ads.