QQQ0.89%

Trending

SOUN23.96%

Feed

News

Sentiment

Info

Historical Prices

home CoinsMARKET

Updated 01:03 AM UTC

MARKETMarket fun

$0.0₅786

$0.00

(0.00%)

Today

News

all

press releases

After Zapper: Where DeFi Users Can Track Their Positions

If you used Zapper to make sense of your wallets, LPs, and random farm experiments, the lights are going off. The team announced it’s winding down, and the site, mobile apps, and API are scheduled to shut on August 3, 2026. That’s a big gap to fill if you checked it daily. This guide walks through practical replacements, the trade-offs on privacy and features, and a simple migration checklist you can do in a weekend. It matters right now because the cutoff date is set and your labels, watchlists, and API calls won’t be there the next morning. Zapper scaled to millions of monthly users and processed billions in volume, so a lot of people are moving at once. Expect some crowding on alternatives and plan ahead. The facts on timing and history are here: the July 8 wind-down announcement and August 3 shutdown window, plus Zapper’s reach at peak and funding background The Block . Reporting also flags what stops working exactly and that API customers are being emailed migration steps Cryptool (blog) . The fastest like-for-like replacements are DeBank, Zerion, DeFiLlama’s Portfolio, Rotki, and CoinStats. DeBank and Zerion feel closest to a Zapper-style all-in-one view, DeFiLlama is lean and clean for on-chain reads, Rotki is for privacy-first locals, and CoinStats covers a lot of CEX plus DeFi. If you need an API, shortlist DeFiLlama’s public endpoints and commercial indexers while you rebuild anything that pointed at Zapper’s API . DeBank and Zerion for quick, familiar dashboards and mobile. DeFiLlama Portfolio for broad chain coverage and a lightweight feel. Rotki if you want local data with no cloud dependencies. CoinStats for mixed CEX plus DeFi portfolios. For APIs, pivot to DeFiLlama endpoints or major indexers while you refactor. Which dashboards replace Zapper’s all-in-one view best? If you liked Zapper’s wallet connect and instant position breakdowns, start with DeBank and Zerion. Both pull balances, DeFi positions, and NFTs across popular chains with a clean, familiar layout. You paste or connect a wallet and it just appears. Mobile apps exist, so you’re not stuck at a desk. DeFiLlama’s Portfolio is simpler, which is part of the charm. It reads wallets across many chains and gets you to the core question fast: what do I hold and where? It isn’t trying to be a wallet or ad platform. It’s a practical read-only pane for most of what you need, including basic LP and staking detections. Rotki is where you go if you want everything to live locally on your machine. It’s open source , more technical to set up, and great if privacy is your top priority. CoinStats can work if your portfolio includes CEX accounts, banked stablecoin rails, and on-chain wallets that you want under one roof. How do the top options compare side by side? Here’s a quick feature snapshot. It’s intentionally high level since chains and features change often. Always verify current coverage on the project site before moving over. ToolBest forData modelMobileNFT viewNotesDeBankFast all-in-one DeFi readsHosted, read-only wallet connectYesYesStrong DeFi position parsing across major chainsZerionPortfolio + wallet experienceHosted, optional in-app walletYesYesGood UX if you want tracking and transacting togetherDeFiLlama PortfolioLightweight on-chain dashboardHosted, read-onlyWeb-firstBasicBroad chain coverage and transparent methodologyRotkiPrivacy, local custody of dataLocal desktop appNoLimitedOpen source, more setup, strong for power usersCoinStatsMixed CEX + DeFi trackingHosted with exchange connectionsYesYesConvenient if you bridge on and off exchanges often These five cover the bulk of use cases. If you only need wallet balances and simple LP exposure, DeFiLlama may be enough. If you want to track and occasionally trade in one place, Zerion’s built-in wallet is handy. If you care about not leaking portfolio data to a third party, Rotki stands out. What changed with Zapper and why does it matter? The short version is finality. Zapper said on July 8, 2026 that it would wind down and set August 3, 2026 as the shutdown date for the website, mobile apps, and API. Coverage also recapped that the project reached roughly 2 million monthly active users and processed over $13 billion of transaction volume at its peak The Block . That scale tells you how many wallets are moving elsewhere at once. It also matters because more than the UI is going away. Articles and vendor posts are explicit that the zapper.xyz dashboard, mobile apps, and API all stop on that date and that existing API customers are getting migration emails Cryptool (blog) . So if you automated reports or had internal tools pinging Zapper endpoints, this is not just a bookmark change. For context, Zapper’s wind-down stories also reference its funding journey, including a $15 million Series A led by Framework Ventures back in May 2021, plus an earlier seed round The Block . It reminds us that even well-backed tools in crypto can sunset. Plan for portability. How should I think about privacy and custody with trackers? Portfolio trackers see what you hold. That alone is sensitive. The first split is hosted dashboards that load your wallet data on their servers versus local tools that keep it on your machine. Hosted tools are faster to start, but you trade some privacy and depend on their uptime and policies. Local-first apps like Rotki store data on your device. No cloud, no centralized account by default. The tradeoff is convenience. You’ll maintain the app and, sometimes, your own indexing sources. If you’re a desk or a high-profile wallet, the privacy win can be worth the extra work. Either way, connect wallets in watch-only mode unless you’re explicitly signing a transaction. Check settings for data sharing, analytics toggles, and whether your addresses are linked to an account email. If you want to be extra careful, create fresh watch-only addresses that you label internally and don’t attach to your name anywhere. Pro tip: label every address as you add it. Even a short note like “main hot,” “vault,” or “old LP farm” will save you hours when you’re reconciling positions or pulling tax exports later. Which tool actually fits my setup? Different stacks, different answers. If you’re mostly DeFi-native across a few EVM chains with some NFTs, DeBank or Zerion will feel right away comfortable. They’re quick, have decent position parsing, and let you peek at friends’ or treasury wallets to benchmark exposure. If you operate many addresses across many chains and just want a dependable read-only pane that loads fast, DeFiLlama’s Portfolio keeps it simple. It won’t try to sell you anything or steer you into swaps. It focuses on showing balances and common DeFi positions cleanly. If you’re compliance heavy or privacy obsessed, Rotki is the path. It can pair with tax workflows and lets you keep sensitive data off third-party servers. If you have a lot of centralized exchange balances in the mix, CoinStats can centralize those with your on-chain wallets so you don’t juggle tabs. What about APIs and reports after Zapper’s shutdown? Since Zapper’s API is going away on August 3 and customers are being contacted about migrations Cryptool (blog) , treat this like a small refactor. First, list every script, sheet, or dashboard that hits Zapper endpoints. Then map each call to a replacement. Public endpoints from data aggregators can fill gaps for basic token balances and prices, while commercial indexers cover deeper position data. If you need institutional-grade feeds, consider splitting your stack: one source for prices, one for balances, one for position decoding. Redundancy helps. Document rate limits and authentication in one place so the next rotation on your team can keep the lights on. For compliance exports, test CSVs from your new tracker against last month’s numbers. Don’t wait until month-end. Reconcile a single wallet deeply to make sure fees, LP tokens, and staked positions land in the right buckets before you switch everything over. Can I do this in a weekend? A simple migration checklist Yes, if you scope it. Here’s a tight checklist that covers most setups: Inventory: list all addresses, ENS names, and any watchlists you used in Zapper. Export: download or screenshot Zapper views you rely on before the cutoff for reference. Select: choose a primary tracker and a backup. Add 3 to 5 core wallets first. Label: recreate key labels while they’re fresh in your head. Reconcile: compare totals and a few positions wallet by wallet. Automate: rebuild any scripts using new APIs and note rate limits. Review: check privacy settings, disable analytics if offered, and keep sign-only to transactions. If you run a team wallet, agree on which app is the source of truth. Write it down. Nothing’s worse than two dashboards showing different numbers and everyone arguing about which is “real.” Common Mistakes Waiting until after the shutdown. Avoid scrambling by setting up a replacement and taking screenshots or exports now. You’ll want a reference point. Forgetting labels and notes. Your memory fades. Recreate labels as you add wallets to the new tool, not a week later. Assuming all chains and vaults are supported. Test one complex position early. If it doesn’t parse, decide if you’ll track it manually or pick another tool. Connecting wallets and signing blindly. Use watch-only wherever possible. Only sign when you intend to transact. Ignoring API differences. Rate limits, pagination, and schemas vary. Update scripts and add retries rather than copy-pasting old code. Mixing work and personal wallets in one account. Separate them to reduce leaks and simplify reporting. If you want more practical explainers like this, Crypto Daily tracks the moving pieces so you don’t have to. Check the latest breakdowns and features at Crypto Daily . Frequently Asked Questions Will my Zapper data vanish on August 3, 2026? Yes, the public site, apps, and API are scheduled to shut then, so plan as if you’ll lose access. The shutdown timing and scope have been reported and reiterated in July coverage The Block and vendor guidance Cryptool (blog) . How do I track positions that my new dashboard doesn’t recognize? Use a second tracker as a backup and keep a small manual sheet for edge cases. Most tools will display the tokens, but some complex vaults or vested positions may require manual tagging until support improves. What if my portfolio includes centralized exchanges? Pick a tracker that supports exchange connections and treat API keys with care. Rotate keys regularly, restrict permissions to read-only, and consider keeping sensitive balances out of any third-party account if privacy is a concern. Do I need to pay for a premium plan? Not always. Many dashboards cover basics for free. You might pay if you need more wallets, deeper history, tax exports, or team features. Start free, see what’s missing, then upgrade only if it saves time. Can I import my Zapper labels into another app? There isn’t a universal importer. If you can export anything from Zapper before the cutoff, do it. Otherwise, rebuild labels as you go and keep a simple mapping doc so you don’t lose context. Is it safe to connect my wallet to these tools? Viewing is generally safe because it’s read-only. That said, only sign transactions you initiate, verify URLs, and avoid extensions or pop-ups that ask for broad approvals. If unsure, use a fresh watch-only address for tracking. How do teams manage multi-sig and treasury tracking? Create a dedicated account in your chosen dashboard for the treasury, add the multi-sig and related wallets, and lock down who can edit labels. Keep routine exports in a shared drive so finance and ops have the same numbers. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

cryptodaily

More News

One Balance, Several Strategies: Inside 1inch Aqua

You know the feeling. A stablecoin on Base, an LP on BNB Chain, a tail asset on Arbitrum, and the trade you want is on Ethereum right now. You either wait, pay to bridge, or sit it out. Meanwhile, half your capital is just parked. Then 1inch rolled out Aqua, and the pitch was blunt: keep one balance you control, express multiple strategies at once, and route across chains like it is one venue. No lock-in. No custodial hop. The timing is not random. A lot of liquidity in modern DEX designs sits there, technically present, practically idle. The data is not subtle, and 1inch is trying to wire around it. The big picture: a shared balance for a fragmented market DeFi keeps spreading out. New chains spin up, gas prices wobble, and the same pair can have five slightly different markets. Traders feel latency and slippage. Liquidity providers feel something worse: weeks where funds do almost nothing. In July, a DEX capital efficiency study sampled roughly 1.84 billion dollars of concentrated liquidity in an average week and found that, on average, only a small slice was actually getting used. The rest sat in-range and unswept or out-of-range, with an estimated hundreds of millions idle and fees effectively left on the table. That is the context Aqua jumps into. Shared-liquidity layers try to make stranded inventory useful by treating chains like lanes on the same highway, not separate cities with toll booths. So who cares? Active LPs who babysit ranges. Passive LPs who hate churn. Treasuries and market makers that need to be everywhere without over-funding every venue. And yes, everyday traders who just want their swap to clear at a fair price without a multi-bridge odyssey. Inside Aqua: a shared liquidity layer you actually control Aqua is 1inch's new self-custodial shared-liquidity layer. It sits across multiple EVM chains and lets you maintain one effective balance you can point at different strategies. 1inch announced the public launch on July 28, 2026, with support live on 13 EVM chains at day one, including Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Robinhood Chain, and BNB Chain 1inch / PR Newswire . Self-custody first You hold keys. There is no central omnibus account. When you allocate capital, it is routed by 1inch infrastructure but remains under your control at the smart contract level. That matters for policy teams and funds that cannot park assets with a third party. One balance, several strategies The core idea is simple enough. Instead of over-funding five chains to chase five opportunities, you keep a consolidated float and plug it into multiple tactics. That could be providing liquidity to a pool here, market making a tight range there, or just keeping a portion ready to fill trades on the fly. It is not magic. You are still on EVM rails. But the orchestration makes decisions faster and smoother. Less time waiting on bridges. Fewer half-funded accounts. How it works in practice If you have used an aggregator or a smart order router, the flow will look familiar. Aqua adds a balance layer to that router logic and makes the multi-chain part feel less clunky. For traders Swaps hit deeper combined liquidity across supported chains and pools, subject to the routes Aqua can access. The routing still respects gas, price impact, and settlement constraints, but it can draw from shared inventory where available. For LPs and treasuries You can express strategies without pre-seeding every chain. That means fewer dead spots where capital sits waiting for the next rebalance window. You still choose risk and venues, but the balance abstraction cuts the overhead. Connect a wallet that supports the chains you plan to touch. Fund your Aqua balance with the assets you are comfortable deploying. Pick strategies or pools you want to support, by chain and by pair. Allocate portions of your balance. You can tweak ranges or keep it passive. Monitor performance and adjust. You can shift allocations without a full bridge cycle in many cases. None of this removes market risk. It just reduces the logistical drag so capital can rotate faster. Where it launched and how incentives are wired 1inch did not soft launch this. They went wide on day one. Aqua was live across 13 EVM chains at public launch, with named support for Ethereum mainnet, Arbitrum, Base, Robinhood Chain, and BNB Chain 1inch / PR Newswire . To seed early depth, 1inch also announced a Merkl-powered incentive program funded with 10,000,000 1INCH from the 1inch Foundation plus a 500,000 USDC boost from the 1inch DAO. Merkl distribution is designed to direct rewards to the addresses that actually add useful liquidity rather than pure mercenary TVL 1inch / PR Newswire . Launch surface ChainRole at launchNotesEthereumSupportedBaseline liquidity and settlement hubArbitrumSupportedLow-cost routing and active LP tacticsBaseSupportedStablecoin pairs and retail flowRobinhood ChainSupportedIncluded at public launchBNB ChainSupportedHigh-throughput retail marketsAdditional EVMs (8)SupportedPart of the 13-chain launch set Incentives are not a magic wand, but they do help kick-start books so slippage is tolerable on day one. The interesting part will be whether rewards can taper without liquidity falling off a cliff. The problem it is targeting: underused v3-style liquidity Concentrated liquidity changed DEXs. It packed depth near the mid and cut idle float. Then the market got complex. Ranges drifted. Sweeps lagged. On-chain frictions added up. In July, researchers looking at v3-family venues reported that in the first half of 2026, only about 13.7 percent of concentrated-liquidity capital was actively used in an average week. Another 56.9 percent sat in-range but unswept, and 29.4 percent was out-of-range. Averaged across the period, roughly 85 percent was underutilized. The sample covered around 1.84 billion dollars of concentrated liquidity per average week, with about 542 million effectively idle, and an estimated 150 million dollars in annualized fees left uncollected across measured venues Dune (blog) . Capital state (H1 2026 avg)Share of CL capitalActively used13.7%In-range but unswept56.9%Out-of-range29.4% Aqua is not a silver bullet for that, but the design lines up with the diagnosis. If you can make one balance feed multiple strategies and move where flow is, you stand a better chance of keeping more of your stack actually working. How Aqua stacks up next to the usual options When you break it down, you have three ways to cope with fragmentation today. Bridge and fund every chain by hand. Use a standard aggregator that still expects per-chain balances. Or adopt a shared-liquidity layer like Aqua. ApproachCapital footprintOperational dragWho it suitsBridge + per-chain LPHigh. Redundant idle buffersHigh. Many rebalances and approvalsAdvanced LPs, chain specialistsClassic aggregatorsMedium. Still per-chain pocketsMedium. Better routes, same balancesMost tradersShared-liquidity layer (Aqua)Lower. One float across venuesLower. Centralized strategy controlsActive LPs, treasuries, MM desks What changes day to day The biggest visible shift is fewer funding bottlenecks. You can shift from a passive stance to an active one in minutes without pausing to refill the right chain. And for treasuries, there is a cleaner audit trail because you do not have a spiderweb of bridge hops to track. Cover/lead graphic for Dune’s July 16, 2026 report “Capital Efficiency in Concentrated Liquidity” — the report (and its charts) underpin the 85% underutilized liquidity finding that motivated 1inch’s Aqua. — Source: Dune What to watch from here New infrastructure always looks tidy in a diagram. Real markets are messy. Here are the signals that will tell you if Aqua is working the way it says on the label. Depth and spreads where it matters Watch the usual pairs on the busiest chains during volatile windows. If Aqua is routing meaningful size without big re-quotes or price impact, the shared balance is doing work. Utilization that actually moves It will be interesting to see if underutilization trends shift. The Dune figures made the point clear: too much capital was idle or unswept in H1 2026 Dune (blog) . If Aqua keeps more balances active, fee capture should track up for participants. Incentives taper The Merkl program is meaningful. Ten million 1INCH plus a 500,000 USDC boost is not small change. But the long-term signal is what happens when rewards cool off. Does the liquidity stick because the routing is good, or does it migrate to the next farm 1inch / PR Newswire ? Institutional comfort Self-custody, clean permissions, and clear controls are table stakes for funds. If Aqua lands audits and keeps the ops clean, expect more treasuries to test it. Risks and what could go wrong Smart contract risk. A balance layer is new surface area. Reviews, formal verification, and live bounties matter. Routing assumptions. Cross-chain routes can break under stress, and partial fills get messy. Incentive cliffs. If rewards drive most of the depth early, a taper can thin books fast. Regulatory shifts. Shared-liquidity rails may attract extra scrutiny from some jurisdictions. UX edge cases. Wallet quirks, token standards, and gas abstraction can bite at scale. Oracle and pricing dependencies. Bad or lagging signals can mean mispriced ranges and losses for LPs. Shared liquidity can amplify wins, but it can also concentrate failure if a route or contract misbehaves. Diversify, and do not deploy more than you can manage. If you want steady coverage and practical edits when the design changes, bookmark Crypto Daily. We track new rails like Aqua and sort the noise from the signal without hype Crypto Daily . Frequently Asked Questions Is Aqua a centralized pool of funds? No. Aqua is designed as a self-custodial layer. You keep control of assets via smart contracts rather than sending them to a centralized account, based on 1inch's public launch materials. Which chains does Aqua support at launch? 1inch said Aqua went live across 13 EVM chains on July 28, 2026, including Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Robinhood Chain, and BNB Chain. More chains are part of the initial 13, but those five were named in the announcement 1inch / PR Newswire . What is the point of a shared balance if I can already use an aggregator? Aggregators route orders but still assume you maintain per-chain balances. Aqua tries to reduce that capital fragmentation by letting one balance back multiple strategies and venues at once. Are there incentives to provide liquidity on Aqua? Yes. 1inch announced a Merkl-powered program funded with 10,000,000 1INCH from the 1inch Foundation and a 500,000 USDC boost from the 1inch DAO to accelerate early depth 1inch / PR Newswire . Does Aqua fix underutilization in v3-style DEXs? It helps address the symptoms by putting more of your balance to work across venues. But concentrated-liquidity dynamics still apply. Ranges can drift, and sweeps can lag. The July 2026 Dune study highlighted these gaps across venues Dune (blog) . What are the main risks I should consider before using Aqua? Smart contract risk, routing edge cases, incentive cliffs, and evolving regulations. Start small, test routes, and read the audits when available. Nothing here is financial advice. How is Aqua different from a bridge aggregator? Bridge aggregators optimize the path for moving assets. Aqua focuses on how you deploy and route a single balance across strategies after the assets are in place, cutting the need to pre-fund every chain. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

cryptodaily

Bitcoin slips under $63,000 despite Iran deal hopes as Coldcard losses rattle market

Oil and Treasury yields fell after fresh U.S.-Iran talks eased inflation fears, but bitcoin and ether failed to catch a bid as fresh Coldcard-linked sweeps pushed observed losses to nearly $89 million.

coindesk

SEC Delays Nasdaq Bitcoin Index Options After CME Challenge

The US Securities and Exchange Commission delayed the launch of Nasdaq PHLX’s proposed Bitcoin index options after agreeing to conduct a full Commission review of the product. The SEC issued the review order on July 29, while its publication in the Federal Register on Aug. 3 established Aug. 24 as the deadline for interested parties to submit written statements supporting or opposing the previous approval. The order does not determine whether CME Group’s legal challenge is valid. Instead, it formally accepts the matter for review and keeps the SEC staff’s May 22 approval suspended until the Commission issues another decision. Nasdaq Bitcoin Options Remain Unable to Launch Nasdaq PHLX proposed cash-settled, European-style Bitcoin options under the ticker QBTC. The contracts would track the CME CF Bitcoin Real Time Index divided by 100. Final settlement would be based on the New York variant of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate, also divided by 100. The proposed rules included a position and exercise limit of 24,000 contracts. Unlike options linked to shares of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds, QBTC would directly reference an index tracking the price of Bitcoin. This distinction is central to the regulatory dispute. Spot Bitcoin ETF shares are classified as securities, while Bitcoin itself is generally treated as a commodity under US derivatives law. SEC staff initially approved the Nasdaq rule change through delegated authority on May 22. CME filed notice of its intention to appeal on June 11, which automatically stayed the approval. CME then submitted its formal petition on June 18 and requested that the full Commission overturn the staff decision. CME Says Bitcoin Options Fall Under CFTC Authority CME argues that Bitcoin is a non-security commodity and that options directly linked to Bitcoin’s value should be classified as commodity option swaps. According to CME, the Commodity Exchange Act gives the Commodity Futures Trading Commission exclusive jurisdiction over these types of Bitcoin derivatives. The exchange operator described the SEC staff’s legal interpretation as erroneous and claimed that the Division of Trading and Markets exceeded its delegated authority by approving the product. However, the SEC’s latest order does not support or reject CME’s arguments. The Commission has only agreed to review the dispute and has not yet issued findings on the merits. CME also argued that the approval could impose more regulatory costs on its exchanges and clearing operations while allowing a competing Bitcoin product to enter the market. The company asked the SEC commissioners to withdraw the staff approval instead of waiting for the outcome of a separate CFTC exemption process. Until the SEC completes its review and issues another order, Nasdaq PHLX will not be able to launch its proposed Bitcoin index options.

coinpaper

Standard Chartered Just Reiterated Their XRP Price Target for 2030

One of the world’s largest financial institutions has kept its long-term XRP forecast intact. Crypto commentator Xaif (@Xaif_Crypto) shared the update to his audience, highlighting that Standard Chartered has maintained a $28 target for XRP by 2030. Standard Chartered’s Long-Term Forecasts Standard Chartered maintains a $500,000 target for Bitcoin by 2030. Ethereum sits at $40,000. Solana lands at $2,000. XRP holds at $28. These figures come from a bank with over $800 billion in assets, which gives them a weight that forecasts from smaller firms rarely carry. Earlier in the year, the bank trimmed some near-term numbers. However, its 2030 projections have stayed in place. The unchanged long-term targets signal continued institutional confidence in the asset class over a multi-year horizon. Standard Chartered just reiterated their 2030 targets despite trimming near-term numbers, ripple:native still at $28 bitcoin:native at $500K ethereum:native at $40K solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 at $2K $28 XRP by 2030 from one of the biggest banks in… pic.twitter.com/QOB3mepFzd — Xaif Crypto (@Xaif_Crypto) August 1, 2026 A Notable Jump for XRP XRP’s $28 target draws particular attention. The asset currently trades at approximately $1.06. Standard Chartered’s $28 target represents a potential gain of roughly 2,540% from that level. Standard Chartered arrived at this figure through its own research framework, and it has now reaffirmed it. The bank’s revised 2026 XRP forecast has dropped to $2.80, down from an earlier $8 projection . But the 2030 number has not moved. Standard Chartered sees short-term pressure and long-term strength for XRP, anticipating major growth for the asset in the coming years. Other Analysts Take Notice Crypto analyst ChartNerd (@ChartNerdTA) responded to Standard Chartered’s forecast, highlighting his target of $27 by 2030. The figure aligns closely with the bank’s $28 target, and it is not the first time ChartNerd has made this call. The analyst has previously identified $27 as an inevitable target for XRP . Standard Chartered’s reaffirmation places a major global bank in agreement with that position. Other community members weighed in with stronger opinions. One commenter called the $28 target unrealistic, suggesting that reaching such levels would require market manipulation . We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 What the Numbers Represent A $28 XRP price by 2030 is not a fringe prediction anymore. It comes from a major global bank that has chosen to hold that figure even after revising other parts of its outlook. ChartNerd’s independent analysis lands within $1 of that same target. Whether the community accepts or disputes the forecast, the convergence between institutional research and independent analysis gives the $28 figure a foundation that is increasingly difficult to overlook. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Standard Chartered Just Reiterated Their XRP Price Target for 2030 appeared first on Times Tabloid .

timestabloid

Trump Media’s bitcoin stash may be down to loan collateral after $165 million BTC move

Wallets tied to the Truth Social parent now hold about as much bitcoin as the company previously pledged as note collateral, making its next 10-Q the key test of whether recent Crypto.com transfers were custody moves or sales.

coindesk

Crypto Token Unlocks Worth $1.28 Billion Set to Hit Market in August

The post Crypto Token Unlocks Worth $1.28 Billion Set to Hit Market in August appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News More than $1.28 billion worth of crypto token unlocks are scheduled over the next month, according to Tokenomist. Major one-time unlocks include HYPE, YZY, PROVE, KAITO, H, ENA, ZRO, CONX, and AVAX, while significant linear unlocks are expected for RAIN, SOL, CC, TRUMP, DOGE, WLD, ASTER, ZEC, MORPHO, TAO, AVAX, and PUMP. Investors are closely …

coinpedia

Bitcoin Faces Jim Cramer's 10-Rule Discipline Test

Crypto News Bitcoin (BTC) is the macro asset COINOTAG is watching after Jim Cramer used his Mad Money segment to restate 10 personal investing rules aimed at surviving volatile markets. The televis...

coinotag

Michael Saylor’s Strategy is now tracking bitcoin’s 200-week moving average

Michael Saylor’s company, Strategy, is now closely monitoring bitcoin’s 200-week moving average, a key long-term support level that the cryptocurrency has historically respected.

coindesk

XRP Ledger v3.2.1 Hotfix Targets Validator Manifest Flooding

XRP Ledger operators have been urged to upgrade to xrpld v3.2.1 after a hotfix was released to address validator manifest flooding that caused high memory and bandwidth usage on affected nodes. The xrpld v3.2.1 release notes show the hotfix was released on July 31, 2026. The issue did not disrupt consensus or transaction processing in the framing provided, but it did create resource pressure for individual nodes. That makes this a stability story rather than a catastrophic network-failure story. The fix is still important. Validator and node reliability are core parts of any blockchain’s health, and resource-exhaustion issues can become serious if left unresolved. TL;DR xrpld v3.2.1 addresses validator manifest flooding. The issue caused high memory and bandwidth use on affected nodes. Operators are urged to upgrade and perform a double restart. What Validator Manifests Do Validator manifests help identify and manage validator keys. In blockchain networks, validators need a reliable way to prove identity and participate in consensus. Manifest-related systems support that process by linking validator identities, signing keys, and operator information. If manifests can be flooded or abused, nodes may waste resources processing unnecessary data. That is what makes this issue relevant. It may not stop the ledger from processing transactions, but it can place extra load on node operators. High resource consumption can affect performance, monitoring, costs, and reliability. Not A Consensus Failure The important caveat is that this should not be described as an XRP Ledger consensus failure. The release materials say individual node memory and bandwidth were affected. They do not say the network stopped, transactions failed globally, or consensus was disrupted. That distinction matters because blockchain security stories can easily become exaggerated. A hotfix is still important, and operators should take it seriously. But users should not read the release as evidence that XRPL stopped functioning. This was a node-resource issue that required an upgrade. Why Operators Need To Move Quickly Even when a bug is not catastrophic, quick operator response matters. If too many nodes remain on vulnerable or inefficient software, the network can carry unnecessary risk. Attackers may continue probing the issue. Infrastructure providers may see higher costs. Public endpoints may degrade. That is why hotfixes exist. They are meant to narrow the window between problem discovery and network-wide mitigation. The double restart instruction also matters because operator steps are part of the fix. It is not enough to know a release exists. Node operators have to apply it properly. XRPL Has Two Upgrade Tracks In Focus This hotfix also arrives around a broader XRPL upgrade cycle. The v3.3.0 release is expected to bring new amendments, while v3.2.1 is a stability-focused hotfix. Those are different stories, and they should not be merged. v3.2.1 is about stopping validator manifest flooding. v3.3.0 is about new features and amendments that may require validator approval. For developers and operators, both matter. For readers, separating them keeps the upgrade picture clearer. Stability Is Part Of Adoption Blockchain adoption is not only about flashy new features. For institutions, exchanges , wallets , and infrastructure providers, reliability matters just as much. A network that wants to support tokenized assets , payments, and regulated use cases needs boring operational stability. Hotfixes are part of that. They show that issues are being found, patched, and communicated. The goal is not to pretend software never has bugs. The goal is to respond before bugs become bigger failures. XRPL’s v3.2.1 release is a reminder that infrastructure work continues behind the scenes, even when the market is focused on price and new features. This article is based on the XRP Ledger xrpld v3 .2.1 release notes. This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae. This report is based on information released in disclosures at primary source documentation .

bitcoinist

Bullish/Bearish Forum Sentiment

Indicates whether most users posting on a crypto’s stream over the last 24 hours are bearish or bullish.

100

Extremely

Bearish

Neutral

Bullish

Extremely

Bearish

Bullish

N/A