$AMRN When signing up for the Q326 CC and the BOD and C suite pay themselves in cash click the link to submit these 8 questions. Don’t wait to be gaslit by a “barrage” of misinformation and narrative from other posters. When they don’t answer you will understand why but don’t swallow the narrative that follows as we lost 40% value this year alone and we head into 2027 and another year of opportunity cost piles up.
Here is the full set of questions for the call:
1. What cash balance does the Board treat as the minimum required for operating liquidity, given current revenue, operating expenses, receivables, and the inventory still on the books? What amount above that minimum is surplus?
2. Is the unused $50 million repurchase authorization frozen because Barclays is running a live strategic process? If so, state that and identify the disclosure or date that would allow the program to start. If that is not the reason, explain why parking surplus cash in short-term Treasuries is a better use of capital for holders than executing the repurchase the company already has authority to complete.
3. Rule 10b-18 is only an execution safe harbor. It is not a reason to leave an authorized program unused. Amarin is an English company. Under section 172 of the Companies Act 2006, directors must act in the way they consider, in good faith, most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of the members. Why has the Board concluded that leaving the $50 million authorization unused, while the shares trade under cash, satisfies that duty?
4. At the current share price, deploying the full $50 million would retire roughly 20 percent of the ADS outstanding and raise cash per remaining share. Has the Board modeled that outcome, and if so, why has it rejected it in favor of Treasury interest?
5. Kostas is the chair and a former Sarissa partner. The August 27, 2026 13D/A shows the fund sold approximately 386,000 ADS around $14 and reduced its reported stake to 6.09 percent. Was any material non-public information regarding EMT2, the Hikma remand, the antitrust cases, or a strategic process known to the chair or to Sarissa before those sales? What information barrier, if any, exists between the chair and the fund that holds the remaining position?
6. In the 2023 proxy materials, ISP Fund LP was included in Sarissa’s group at 6,663,377 ordinary shares (approximately 333,000 ADS after the ratio change). Innoviva has stated it is unwinding its funding of ISP. Does the Board know whether any of the shares sold in August were ISP shares, whether those shares were transferred to Innoviva, or whether Innoviva now holds an Amarin position that should have been reported? If the Board does not know, why has it not asked?
7. Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires directors to act in the way they consider, in good faith, most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of the members. The company has an unused $50 million repurchase authorization, cash and short-term investments of approximately $315 million, and shares trading below cash. It has also written off more than $75 million related to supply contracts and inventory under the current Board. What specific analysis has the Board performed to conclude that leaving the authorization unused and parking surplus cash in Treasuries promotes the success of the company for the benefit of the members?
8. Retail has now voted against the equity plans at two consecutive annual general meetings. The Board has continued to compensate itself and senior management in cash. Has the Board obtained independent advice on whether continuing that practice, while the repurchase authorization sits unused and the shares trade under cash, is consistent with its duties to the members under section 172? If so, will that advice be disclosed?