Rebooter
$NAUT $QSI This assertion is so ridiculous it's difficult to know where to start. The TAM for mass spectrometry ALONE in 2026 is $7.9 billion to $8.3 billion and is projected to reach $13 billion by 2033.
70% of revenues in the proteomics category is reagents and consumables. Because NAUT's platform employs an affinity-based approach, reagents will be supplied to the end researcher by a third party. NAUT will only see a fraction of that revenue. In fact, this dependence on external suppliers is, per Nautilus CEO Patel, the reason the company is four years late (and counting) on Voyager.
By contrast, QSI owns their supply chain and the recurring, high margin revenue that results from it.
Understand, these two companies are not direct competitors. In some larger wet labs, the two platforms will sit side by side e.g. Voyager for upstream intake and Proteus for downstream analysis.
I'm not sure what information you "parsed out", but your comment is flat out inaccurate.
12
