The SEC Proposes “Attack on SPACs”

The era of SPAC Attacks has officially turned to the ‘Attack on SPACs.’ 💀 🗡️ The SEC just announced its interest in passing legislation which would force SPACs to publish important financial information prior to a public listing

SPAC stands for Special Purpose Acquisition Company. A SPAC IPO is unlike your traditional public offering: when a SPAC launches, it asks people to invest money with the promise that the SPAC will acquire a promising, up-and-coming company. One advantage to SPACs is that a privately-owned company could go public without having to file extensive paperwork.

However, given a number of high-profile failures and dishonest reports from the SPAC world, the SEC wants to regulate the disclosure process. They think it’s wrong that traditional IPOs require extensive reporting for prospective shareholders while SPACs get to avoid much of this process. 

Generally, the SEC wants to implement investor protections that prevent SPAC directors from hoodwinking shareholders into voting for undesirable deals. Here’s a brief summary of the SEC’s proposed attack on SPACs

  • SPACs will have to publish information about their sponsors’ compensation from the investment vehicle. 
  • SPACs must disclose the dilution of shareholders’ equity after an M&A deal to prevent an unfair reduction in stake. 
  • Executives of companies acquired by SPACs will be held accountable for any wrongdoings of the SPAC’s directors or sponsors. 
  • Any information related to a potential M&A deal must be disclosed to SPAC shareholders 20 days prior to a shareholder vote. 
  • SPAC sponsors and directors will have guidelines around the language they use to “sell” deals to their investors. In other words, the SEC wants to be sure that investors aren’t bullied or tricked into voting for a deal.

SPAC listings generated a record $160 billion in 2021, but many SPAC darlings from the pandemic era are suffering in 2022. It should be interesting to see the results of the SEC’s crackdown on blank check companies. 👀

More in   Policy

View All

New Year, Same POTential

Cannabis stocks had another rough year in 2024, failing to make any meaningful progress or participate in the broader stock market’s rally. But, like all beaten-down industries, they occasionally pop back in the news like they did today. 📰

In late August, the industry’s biggest names and ETFs began rallying after a top official at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) wrote to Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Administrator Anne Milgram. In it, the official called for marijuana to be reclassified as a Schedule III drug under the Controlled Substances Act. 

Read It

A “Meeting Of The Minds”

Investors’ game of “whack a mole” continues as banking sector fears continue. As one bank’s crisis is seemingly avoided, the market moves on to its next potential victim.

Today that victim was Deutsche Bank. The German lender’s shares extended their decline after a sudden spike in the bank’s Credit Default Swaps (CDS). This asset is essentially an insurance policy against the bank’s failure, so a jump in price means the market is pricing in a rising risk of failure.

Read It

A Central Bank Bonanza

The Federal Reserve set a hawkish tone yesterday, causing U.S. Treasury yields to break out to new cycle highs. The benchmark 10-year yield touched its highest level in sixteen years as rates approached their pre-financial crisis peaks. 📈

Read It

Chinese Regulators Aren’t Playing Games

As if investors in Chinese stocks didn’t have enough to worry about, the government introduced a new wild card. 🤪

Beijing released draft guidelines designed to curb excessive gaming and spending among consumers. The proposed rules would require owners of online games to abstain from providing or condoning high-value or expensive transactions in virtual entities, whether by auction or speculative activity. Daily login rewards would also be banned, along with pop-up warnings to users displaying “irrational” consumption behavior. 🚫

Read It