GVH Globavend Holdings Ltd.

$GVH Don’t put all your eggs in one basket—but also, don’t miss the opportunity to invest in companies that are at historic lows. Buy a little here and there, and hold onto them until you see a 40-fold return; that is how smart investors operate. An example involving just one of 100 of companies: Retail investors abandoned $PLTR at a price of $5.84, while large, savvy investors bought in and held on. Their patience paid off, as the price later reached $212.94—a gain of more than 36 times their initial investment. 5 or 6 years ago, $NIO reached a peak of $66.90—back when it was just starting out & had little to justify such a valuation. Today, it sits at $3.32, despite having achieved significant growth—a trajectory that continues, whether through quarter-over-quarter increases in vehicle deliveries, the expansion of charging stations, or partnerships (such as the one with Geely for battery swapping). Would I be crazy to let it slip away at this price, just as it’s beginning to bear fruit?

$GVH Another Chinese company I am adding to my list alongside $GVH is $NIO. $GVH current price: $1.10 $NIO current price: $3.40

$GVH The volume is still terrible. They need to release some kind of update on the microdramas.

$GVH looks like gvh got taken down just like every china company did.mmm did this to them all the made billions.imho

$GVH fundamentals look to be solid. Undervalued if looking at Price to Book ratio, considering increasing revenue stream. The Nov 14th Macau event should bode well for revenue in Q4. The unknown is the draw on the SEPA, if it is zero or a low number than stock could rise significantly. It doesn’t seem like they need any additional cash at the moment at the Macau event should provide a nice cash bonus.

$GVH its earnings are higher than its stock price. I may need to wait some time before others catch on.

$GVH $NIO I have taken a heavy position in $NIO with major investment targets. While my position in $GVH isn't huge compared to $NIO, I am still betting on $GVH because it is significantly undervalued.