milans100
$HRTX Got my PACER account cleared. Here's a summary of Heron's opening brief and their main arguments.
To me, the most compelling argument is #3. Apparently, through the entire trial. Bryson interpreted the claims one way, and then literally changed the interpretation 180 degrees after the trial proceedings were done. Heron was not given a chance to argue the new interpretation, not to mention that the new interpretation goes completely against precedence as well as Bryson's own interpretation in the Fresenius case.
This country needs to put in a law that people over 80 cannot not serve in public office. They really do f--- it all up.
24
