ZKzkSync

Britain’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has warned Premier League clubs to stop making sponsorship deals with unauthorized crypto firms and trading platforms risk exposing both fans and clubs to financial harm . The regulator insisted that Premier League clubs that sign sponsorship deals with crypto firms and trading platforms that are not allowed to operate in the UK are misusing the trust of millions of fans. Do Premier League teams sign deals with unauthorized companies? Top-flight football runs on cash and sponsorship deals have become the biggest source of income for many clubs. So for many of them, saying no to a big check is very hard. Manchester City, the former Premier League champions, earned a massive €408 million ($475 million) from commercial and sponsorship deals in 2025, more money than the €332 million the club got from selling TV rights. While no individual companies were named in its warning, OKX, one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges and a Manchester City sponsor, is not registered with the FCA and agreed to pay over $500 million for violating U.S. anti-money laundering laws. Lucy Castledine, the FCA’s director of consumer investments said through these partnerships, football clubs allow unauthorized financial firms to exploit the loyalty of millions of fans by putting “potentially dodgy products” in front of them. UK football clubs are now expected to run proper due diligence on financial services sponsors before signing, and to continue those checks on an ongoing basis. The FCA also confirmed it is coordinating with the UK government, the Premier League, and the Independent Football Regulator to address the issue across the sport. What happens if clubs ignore the FCA’s warning? The FCA included in its statement that clubs that go ahead with partnerships with unauthorized firms will be potentially exposed to “legal liability, money laundering risks and serious reputational damage.” Some clubs have already been contacted regarding existing partnerships. The FCA’s actions are prompted by a number of previous incidents in which unauthorized sponsorships ended badly. For instance, FC Barcelona confirmed a partnership with a Samoa-registered firm Zero-Knowledge Proof back in November 2025, describing it as a data privacy project. Within days, ZKP began promoting a token sale. Barcelona was forced to issue a late-night statement insisting it had “no connection whatsoever” to the token and that no token activity was included in the sponsorship agreement. The former Barcelona director Xavier Vilajoana publicly asked the club to explain how it vetted the deal. In a separate case, FTX had signed a 19-year, $135 million naming rights deal with Miami-Dade County for the arena housing the NBA’s Miami Heat, a $210 million partnership with esports organization TSM, and sponsorship agreements with Formula 1 team Mercedes-AMG Petronas, according to Stinson LLP . All three partners ended up in bankruptcy court seeking to exit their contracts. In cycling, professional women’s team Canyon//SRAM terminated its partnership with the embattled cryptocurrency exchange Zondacrypto on June 2, citing alleged breaches of contract. The team is now removing all sponsor branding from its equipment, clothing, and digital platforms. The FCA has urged supporters to check any financial services firm on its online Firm Checker tool before using their products. Any firm providing financial services that does not appear on the register is not regulated, and consumers will have no regulatory protection if something goes wrong. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .

🚨 Blockchain payments are exposing corporate data, sparking privacy concerns. Zero-knowledge proof (ZK) technology can help shield sensitive details in $ETH transactions. 🕵️‍♂️ Critical data: AI-driven payments will boost on-chain privacy needs even further. Continue Reading: Corporate blockchain payments face privacy risk as ZK tech grows The post Corporate blockchain payments face privacy risk as ZK tech grows appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

Key Takeaways : MANTA price surged toward $0.079. Our Manta price forecast expects Manta price to surge to a maximum level of $0.8 in 2026. In 2032, Manta price prediction expects Manta price to record a maximum level of $5. Launched in September 2023, Manta Network gained significant attention within the cryptocurrency community after its token generation event, leading to trending status on major coin aggregators and news outlets. Beyond the initial buzz, Manta Network presents innovative technology through a modular zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup for Ethereum , featuring Solidity smart contracts and a decentralized identity layer one network focusing on compliance. This article will explore the details of the Manta Network and examine potential future price movements of its native token, $MANTA, to provide a comprehensive MANTA price prediction. Overview Cryptocurrency Manta Network Ticker Symbol MANTA Price $0.079 Price Change 24H +6% Market Cap $30 Million Circulating Supply 465.43 Million MANTA Trading Volume 24H $6.74 Million All-Time High $4.08 (Mar 13, 2024) All-Time Low $0.053 (Oct 11, 2025) Manta Network: Technical Analysis Metric Value Current Price $0.079 Price Prediction $ 0.06055 (-25.23%) Fear & Greed Index 47 (Neutral) Sentiment Bearish Volatility 3.19% (Medium) Green Days 15/30 (50%) 50-Day SMA $ 0.06493 200-Day SMA $ 0.08112 14-Day RSI 53.54 (Neutral) MANTA Price Analysis: Manta faces bullish pressure above $0.079 MANTA price analysis shows that MANTA price surged toward $0.08 Resistance for Manta is at $0.08185 Support for MANTA/USDT is at $0.07393 Manta price analysis 1-day chart: Manta surges toward $0.079 Analyzing the daily price chart of the MANTA token on 29 May, the coin is making an upward push toward $0.08. Currently, buyers are aiming for a hold above immediate Fib levels and they are strongly defending further declines. The 24-hour volume dropped to $3.48 million, showing a decline in trading activity today. Manta is trading at $0.079, surging by over 6% in the last 24 hours. MANTAUSD Price Chart by TradingView The RSI-14 trend line has surged from its previous level and hovers around 55, showing that bulls are preparing to control price momentum. The SMA-14 level suggests volatility in the next few hours. Manta/USDT 4-hour price chart: Bears trigger selling pressure The 4-hour Manta price chart suggests MANTA continues to face bullish activity around EMA lines, creating a positive sentiment in the price chart. However, sellers aim for a correction by holding the price below the EMA20 trend line. MANTAUSD Price Chart by TradingView The BoP indicator trades in a positive region at 0.04, hinting that buyers are trying to build pressure near resistance levels and trigger an upward correction. Additionally, the MACD trend line has formed green candles above the signal line, and the indicator aims for positive momentum, strengthening bvuying positions. Manta Price Prediction: Levels and Action Daily Simple Moving Average (SMA) Period Value Action SMA 3 $ 0.06744 BUY SMA 5 $ 0.06758 SELL SMA 10 $ 0.06716 BUY SMA 21 $ 0.06648 BUY SMA 50 $ 0.06493 BUY SMA 100 $ 0.06793 SELL SMA 200 $ 0.08112 SELL Daily Exponential Moving Average (EMA) Period Value Action EMA 3 $ 0.06762 SELL EMA 5 $ 0.06755 SELL EMA 10 $ 0.06716 BUY EMA 21 $ 0.06645 BUY EMA 50 $ 0.06637 BUY EMA 100 $ 0.07123 SELL EMA 200 $ 0.09213 SELL What to expect from Manta price analysis next? The hourly price chart confirms that bears are making efforts to prevent the Manta price from an immediate surge. However, if the Manta price successfully breaks above $0.08185, it may surge higher and touch the resistance at $0.09096. MANTAUSD Price Chart by TradingView If bulls cannot initiate a surge, Manta’s price may drop below the immediate support line at $0.07393, resulting in a correction to $0.07011. Is MANTA a good investment? Manta’s rapid rise in DeFi TVL charts and alignment with Ethereum ‘s scaling roadmap via technologies like Manta Pacific suggest $MANTA’s potential. Grants support its ecosystem growth, and it leads in ZK technology adoption, promising for blockchain ‘s future. However, regulatory concerns over transaction privacy could affect its long-term viability, potentially impacting ZK protocols like $MANTA. Overall, Manta is a good investment if you want a profitable return in the long term. Why is the Manta price up today? Manta price triggered strong buying pressure after buyers maintained their demand. This resulted in a push toward $0..079. Will Manta price recover? If bulls hold the price above $0.08, we might see further recovery toward immediate resistance channels. Will Manta price reach $10? In recent months, the Manta network expanded its offerings and established multiple partnerships. If buying demand continues to increase in the coming years, its price might surpass the $10 mark by 2040. Will Manta reach $100? Depending on the current market sentiment, the Manta price might take several years to reach the $100 milestone. We expect the Manta price to achieve $100 by 2060. Will Manta reach $1000? $1000 is a distant dream for Manta price. However, if everything remains in favor of the altcoin market, we might even see the Manta price hitting $1K. Is Manta a good long-term investment? Investors are bullish on Manta, which has gained significant attention in recent months. If developers continue to build robust utilities for Manta and the roadmap fulfills user demand, it can be a good long-term investment option. Recent MANTA news/ opinions Manta Network will end staking rewards on 20 May 2026, stopping new MANTA token emissions and closing its inflationary staking model. Key timeline for Manta Staking: – Staking rewards will officially stop in two weeks on May 20, 2026, starting from today. – Operators may exit the program at any time starting immediately – After the deadline, no further network rewards will be generated — Manta Network (🔱,🔱) (@MantaNetwork) May 6, 2026 MANTA price prediction May 2026 If the altcoin market witnesses a surge in buying pressure this month, we might see a rebound in the MANTA price. In May, we expect Manta’s price to record a minimum of $0.06 and a maximum of $0.08. The average price is expected to be around $0.07. Manta Price Prediction Potential Low Potential Average Potential High Manta Price Prediction May 2026 $0.06 $0.07 $0.08 Manta price prediction 2026 Due to the impact of Bitcoin’s halving, Bitcoin and leading altcoins could reach new highs in 2026. However, some believe the event’s predictability changes because of crypto’s current popularity. Technical analysis indicates that in 2026, Manta Network is expected to reach a minimum price of $0.05. The MANTA token might attain a maximum price of $0.8, while the average trading price is $0.6. Manta Price Prediction Potential Low ($) Potential Average ($) Potential High ($) Manta Price Prediction 2026 0.05 0.6 0.8 Manta price predictions 2027-2032 Year Minimum Price ($) Average Price ($) Maximum Price ($) 2027 0.1 0.9 1.5 2028 0.7 1.6 2.2 2029 1.1 1.9 2.9 2030 1.8 2.6 3.5 2031 2.3 3.2 4.1 2032 3 4.3 5 MANTA Price Prediction for 2027 Ethereum upgrades will benefit Manta Network. With growing interest in privacy tech like ZK solutions, Manta Network is poised to grow, likely increasing its token value. In 2027, Manta Network is projected to have a minimum price of $0.10. The MANTA token is expected to reach a maximum price of $1.50, with an average price of $0.90. Manta Network Forecast 2028 By 2028, Manta Network is predicted to have a minimum value of $0.70. It may reach a maximum value of $2.20, with an average trading price of $1.60. Manta Network Price Prediction 2029 Through a detailed technical analysis of past price data, Manta Network is estimated to reach a minimum price of $1.10 in 2029. The token could see a maximum price of $2.90, with an average trading price of $1.90. Manta Price Prediction 2030 In 2030, the minimum expected price for one Manta Network token is projected to be $1.80. The maximum price could reach $3.50, with an average trading price of $2.60. Manta Price Prediction 2031 For 2031, the Manta price prediction indicates a minimum of $2.30. According to projections, the MANTA token could achieve a maximum of $4.10, with an average forecast price of $3.20. Manta Price Prediction 2032 In 2032, the minimum expected price for one Manta Network token is projected to be $3.00. The maximum price could reach $5.00, with an average trading price of $4.30. Manta price prediction 2026-2032 Manta Network Price Prediction: Analysts’ MANTA Price Forecast Firm Name 2026 2027 Coincodex $0.2162 $0.1772 DigitalCoinPrice $0.14 $0.19 Cryptopolitan’s Manta Price Prediction At Cryptopolitan, we are bullish on Manta’s price prediction as it flashes bullish on-chain signals amid growing buying demand. Investors are keenly watching the Manta Network market to discern potential movements in its future price trends and analyze changes in Manta Network’s price. Technical analysis indicates that in 2026, Manta Network is expected to reach a minimum price of $0.05. The MANTA token might attain a maximum price of $0.8, while the average trading price is $0.6. Manta Historic Price Sentiment Manta Historic Price Sentiment January 18, 2024: MANTA launched on the open market at approximately $2.24. January 22, 2024: Price rose steadily, exceeding $2.70 before retracting to $2.40. Bullish Rebound: The following months showed a strong upward trend, with MANTA reaching an all-time high of $4 in March. April Decline: Momentum faded, and the price declined below $2. In May, the price of Manta rebounded and is aimed for a retest of the $2 mark. In recent weeks of June, Manta price declined heavily and dropped below the $1 mark. In July, Manta price continued its bearish move as it settled below the $1 mark. In August, the price of Manta surged toward $0.86; however, it later dropped toward $0.6. In September, Manta surged toward the $0.97 high only to face a rejection. In October, the price of Manta surged toward $0.85; however, it failed to maintain that momentum. In November, the MANTA price surged above $1.2 and is currently maintaining above that level. In December, Manta price dropped toward the low of $0.82. Though Manta started 2025 on a bullish note, it failed to hold its momentum. As a result, the price lost its $1 mark and crashed toward the low of $0.28 in early March. By the end of March, the price dropped further below $0.2. In April, the price surged toward the high of $0.25 but it later dropped. In May, the price of Manta surged toward the high of $0.35 but failed to maintain the momentum. As a result, Manta declined toward $0.22 in early June. By the end of June, MANTA price dropped toward $0.19. In July, MANTA price surged toward $0.26 but it later declined below $0.2 in early August. By the end of August, the price of MANTA again dropped below $0.2. By September’s end, MANTA price declined below $0.17. By the end of October, MANTA price dropped below $0.1. Throughout November, the price consolidated around $0.1. In December, the price of MANTA dropped significantly toward the low of $0.07. Currently, MANTA is maintaining its price around $0.08 throughout January 2026. The price of MANTA continued to consolidate around $0.08 in early February. By the end of February, the MANTA price dropped toward $0.058. In March, MANTA fluctuated a lot, ending at $0.061. In April, MANTA surged toward $0.073.

Charles Hoskinson said Midnight.city, the interactive simulation tied to Cardano’s privacy-focused Midnight ecosystem, is preparing for a new beta-testing phase that he believes could put it on a path to become crypto’s most-used application by 2030. The Input Output founder framed the next version of Midnight.city as more than a product test. In a post on X, Hoskinson said the platform would soon bring in “thousands of beta testers” to stress-test and refine its design, utility and user experience. “I’m super excited about the next iteration of Midnight.city,” Hoskinson wrote. “We will have thousands of beta testers coming online soon and gather incredible feedback about how to improve and refine the experience and utility of the world. It’s the largest and most meaningful focus group ever done.” He added that the team’s development cadence would be central to how quickly the product evolves. “Combined with two week sprints, within a few months we’ll be well on our way to a new civilization. One that’s crypto native, has privacy at the core, and evolves in weeks instead of decades. I predict Midnight.city will be the most used crypto application by 2030.” Could This Cardano App Will Lead Crypto By 2030? Midnight.city is the public-facing simulation layer for Midnight, a privacy-oriented blockchain associated with the Cardano ecosystem. The official Midnight site describes the network as a blockchain focused on programmable privacy, selective disclosure and predictable costs, with developers able to determine what information remains protected and what can be disclosed when required. The city itself is designed as a live environment rather than a conventional block explorer or wallet interface. Midnight describes it as a simulation populated by autonomous AI agents that work, trade, interact and generate ongoing economic activity, creating sustained transaction volume intended to make zero-knowledge systems more visible to users. That design matters because privacy infrastructure is difficult to demonstrate in consumer-facing form. The official Midnight blog says Midnight.city lets users inspect the same transaction from different disclosure perspectives, including public mode, auditor mode and a simulation-only “god mode,” showing how selective disclosure can reveal specific fields to authorized parties while keeping other data shielded. Midnight’s broader pitch is that privacy should not mean opacity by default. The network uses zero-knowledge proofs and a dual-state ledger model to allow public on-chain state and local private state to interact, while its Compact programming language is intended to let developers build privacy-preserving applications without requiring deep specialist knowledge of ZK cryptography. The project also uses a two-part economic model . NIGHT is the network’s unshielded native and governance token, while DUST is a shielded, non-transferable resource used to pay for transactions and execute smart contracts. Midnight says this model is intended to separate capital assets from operational costs and make application usage more predictable. At press time, Cardano traded at $0.24.

You open a DeFi app to move funds and a pop-up warns that deposits from certain addresses may be blocked by counterparties. Minutes later, a friend messages: their transfer was delayed after a compliance screen flagged earlier interactions with a mixer. None of this was in the brochure for “open finance.” Privacy—long treated as optional UX—has become DeFi’s next test. Ethereum is now being asked to reconcile transparency with confidentiality, censorship-resistance with compliance, and global access with jurisdictional rules. The industry is coining new language for this tension. In this article we use “CROPS” as a shorthand to describe that emerging mandate. There is no formal CROPS standard from the Ethereum Foundation or a regulator. Instead, think of it as the pressure to balance five imperatives that keep the ecosystem viable: censorship-resistance, regulatory compliance, openness, privacy, and security. The Big Picture Why now? Three currents converged: enforcement on privacy tooling, institutional interest in on-chain finance, and maturing zero-knowledge (ZK) tech that makes selective disclosure feasible. The result: DeFi can no longer punt on privacy; it must redesign it. The next phase of Ethereum adoption likely depends on proving that privacy and compliance can coexist—without undermining permissionless access and security. On the enforcement front, the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Tornado Cash smart contracts in 2022, a milestone that reset expectations around mixer usage ( U.S. Treasury ). In the EU, the Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation (MiCA) and the companion Transfer of Funds Regulation extend the “travel rule” to crypto-asset service providers, forcing stronger identity controls on fiat–crypto perimeters ( MiCA , TFR ). In late 2023, FinCEN proposed special measures on “mixing” activity, signaling sustained scrutiny of obfuscation tools ( FinCEN ). Meanwhile, Ethereum advanced scalability with EIP-4844’s data-availability milestone and account abstraction via EIP-4337, enabling richer wallet logic and new privacy patterns ( EIP-4844 , EIP-4337 ). Institutions exploring tokenized assets expect confidentiality for order flow and counterparties. Retail users want protection from on-chain surveillance. Both cohorts are pushing for usable, auditable privacy. What Is the CROPS Mandate? Again, CROPS is an editorial mnemonic—an implicit mandate Ethereum faces, not a codified rule: Censorship-resistance: Transactions should be includable on a neutral network, regardless of off-chain politics. Regulatory compliance: Front ends, service providers, and enterprises must meet AML, sanctions, and reporting obligations in their jurisdictions. Openness: Protocols remain permissionless and composable; anyone can build and interact at the base layer. Privacy: Users need confidentiality for balances, counterparties, and strategies—ideally with selective disclosure. Security: Cryptography, smart contracts, and infrastructure must resist exploits and data leakage. These forces often pull in different directions. DeFi teams feel it most acutely at three touchpoints: wallet onboarding (identity and screening), transaction submission (mempool and MEV exposure), and settlement (auditability, provenance, and disclosures). How Ethereum Privacy Works Now Privacy on Ethereum is not a single tool; it is a menu of approaches with different threat models, trade-offs, and regulatory profiles. Zero-knowledge rollups and private L2s ZK rollups publish validity proofs that a batch of transactions followed the rules without revealing all underlying data. Some projects are exploring encrypted state and selective disclosure to provide application-level privacy while maintaining on-chain proofs ( Aztec ). ZK systems can natively support compliance flows—think “prove you’re allowed to interact” without doxxing an identity attribute. Selective-disclosure identity Verifiable Credentials (VCs) let issuers (exchanges, banks, KYC providers) attest to facts about a user, which can be proven in zero-knowledge to a smart contract or front end. Emerging stacks include W3C VCs , Polygon ID , and the Ethereum Attestation Service . This unlocks “ZK-KYC”: proving sanctions-screened, jurisdiction-eligible, or accredited status without exposing PII on-chain. Application-layer privacy Privacy-preserving DEXs and lending markets use techniques like homomorphic encryption, secure enclaves, or ZK proofs to hide order flow and positions while preserving auditable state transitions. Some EVM-compatible environments incorporate trusted execution environments for confidential computation, with trade-offs around trust in hardware ( Oasis Sapphire ). Sender/receiver privacy Proposals such as stealth addresses and one-time destination keys aim to shield recipients without complex mixers; view keys allow auditors or tax authorities to see activity by consent ( stealth addresses overview ). Legacy mixers and coinjoin-style tools Mixers pool funds to break deterministic linkages. They provide strong privacy but attract regulatory scrutiny due to non-selective obfuscation. Their use has become riskier for users interacting with regulated entities, especially after high-profile sanctions actions. ApproachWhat it hidesTrust assumptionsCompliance fitDeveloper effortZK rollup with encrypted stateState, balances, counterparties (selective)Cryptographic soundness; DA on L1High (supports ZK-KYC, proofs)HighVC + ZK-KYC gatingPII off-chain; on-chain proves eligibilityIssuer honesty; wallet custody of credsHigh (policy-expressive)MediumTEE-based confidential EVMComputation and mempool payloadsHardware enclave trust; remote attestationMedium (auditable logs possible)MediumStealth addresses/view keysRecipient linkagesKey management; wallet UXMedium (opt-in disclosure)Low–MediumMixers/coinjoinTx graph linkagesPool size; relayer integrityLow (non-selective obfuscation)Low Where Compliance Bites in DeFi Unlike custodial exchanges, most DeFi protocols are non-custodial and run as autonomous software. Still, compliance pressure surfaces at multiple layers: Front ends and geofencing User interfaces operated by identifiable entities often implement IP blocks, wallet screens, or credential checks to avoid serving restricted users. This raises questions about equal access and pushes power to interface operators rather than the protocol itself. Counterparty risk for liquidity Liquidity providers (LPs) and market makers using regulated banking rails face exposure if their on-chain flows are tainted by sanctioned addresses. Many now use analytics to pre-screen pools and counterparties ( Chainalysis , TRM Labs ), which can lead to de facto blacklisting, sometimes with false positives. Travel rule at the perimeter CASPs must share originator/beneficiary information for cross-platform transfers under the EU travel rule. Travel-rule messaging utilities help exchanges comply, but DeFi wallets and permissionless protocols are not straightforward counterparts ( Notabene ). Expect bridges between custodial perimeters and self-custody to be compliance-heavy, pushing selective-disclosure credentials into mainstream wallets. Mempool visibility and MEV Public mempools leak intent before inclusion. Searchers exploit this for MEV, but it also means compliance tools can observe flows. Private orderflow and encrypted mempools are being developed to reduce harmful MEV and improve privacy, including research into PBS and off-chain builders ( PBS overview ) and privacy-preserving orderflow like SUAVE ( Flashbots SUAVE ). Building Compliant Privacy: A Practical Path If you are designing a DeFi protocol or wallet today, you can integrate privacy without excluding users or inviting unacceptable risk. A practical sequence looks like this: Define your threat model: Decide whether you are protecting user identity, counterparties, strategies, or all three. Clarify who must be able to audit (users, counterparties, regulators, or the public). Choose a disclosure policy: Express rules as on-chain verifications (e.g., “user holds a credential signed by issuer X proving not on sanctions list and is jurisdiction-eligible”). Avoid hardcoding PII or lists; verify signatures and revocation status. Pick a credential stack: Use W3C VCs, a ZK-friendly schema, and a wallet that can safely hold credentials. Consider Polygon ID or EAS for attestations. Implement ZK proofs: Integrate a circuit that proves compliance attributes without revealing raw data. Keep circuits upgradable via governance, with transparent audits. Segment flows: Separate “public” pools from “credential-gated” pools to avoid cross-contamination of compliance assumptions. Document bridging rules clearly. Offer view-key or consented audit: Let users generate viewing keys or grant decrypt permissions for tax filings, disputes, or regulated counterparties. Harden your mempool strategy: Use private RPCs or encrypted orderflow where feasible; be transparent about builder relationships and inclusion guarantees. Plan for revocation and recovery: Credentials expire; users lose keys. Add processes to re-verify and to rotate attestations without deanonymizing prior activity. Teams should publish a clear privacy policy for smart contracts: what is hidden, what can be proven, who can decrypt, and how disputes are resolved. This is not just legal hygiene; it is core product documentation for power users. Collateral Effects: MEV, Censorship, and L2 Trade-offs Privacy choices ripple across Ethereum’s fee markets and decentralization guarantees. Inclusion, liveness, and CR After OFAC’s Tornado Cash action, some block builders and relays avoided transactions interacting with sanctioned contracts, sparking a debate over censorship at the protocol’s edge. Research into enshrined PBS and techniques like inclusion lists aims to keep proposers honest and reduce reliance on centralized infrastructure. Progress here supports the “C” in CROPS—ensuring censorship-resistance even when application-layer privacy grows. MEV and private orderflow Encrypted orderflow and private mempools can reduce front-running and sandwiching, improving user outcomes. But they can also concentrate power if a few orderflow brokers dominate. SUAVE and similar designs try to keep orderflow markets open while preserving privacy. DeFi teams should treat orderflow routing as a first-class product choice and publish their policies. L2 sovereignty vs. shared security Private L2s promise confidentiality but introduce new governance and trust assumptions (sequencer neutrality, data-availability choices, emergency controls). Builders must weigh the benefits of privacy against the risks of central control or opaque upgrades, and disclose those choices to users. Outlook: What Tips Adoption Privacy will move from “nice-to-have” to table stakes if three things happen: credible compliance integrations, smooth wallet UX, and battle-tested cryptography. Institutional bridges: Tokenized assets and RWAs will prefer venues where counterparties can privately attest to eligibility and risk limits. Expect ZK-KYC pools and permissioned privacy rails to grow alongside permissionless venues. Retail safeguards: View keys and selective disclosure built into mainstream wallets could normalize privacy while keeping off-ramps comfortable with provenance. Better standards: Interoperable schemas for attestations and revocation will prevent fragmenting users across incompatible privacy silos. None of this guarantees regulatory alignment. But if Ethereum can show that privacy reduces consumer harm (e.g., by preventing exploitation and data leaks) while preserving auditability under due process, the CROPS balance becomes more plausible. Risks & What Could Go Wrong Over-centralized privacy rails: If a few issuers or brokers dominate credential verification or private orderflow, DeFi inherits Web2-style gatekeepers. False positives and exclusion: Imperfect analytics or revocation lists may block innocent users; appeals and redress are hard on-chain. Smart-contract and crypto failures: ZK circuits, TEEs, or key-management bugs could leak data or freeze funds. Security audits and formal verification remain essential. Regulatory divergence: Jurisdictions may set incompatible rules, fracturing liquidity and user experiences across regions. Chilling effects on builders: Legal uncertainty around privacy tooling can deter open-source contributors and push development offshore. Complacency about censorship: Relying on benevolent builders or relays without protocol-level guarantees leaves inclusion fragile. Privacy that “works” technically but fails on openness or censorship-resistance is a Pyrrhic victory; the cure cannot undermine the core value of permissionless access. For ongoing coverage of Ethereum’s evolving privacy stack, protocol governance, and compliance shifts, readers can follow analyses from Crypto Daily at cryptodaily.co.uk . Frequently Asked Questions Is there an official Ethereum “CROPS mandate”? No. CROPS in this article is a shorthand for balancing censorship-resistance, regulatory compliance, openness, privacy, and security. It is not an official Ethereum policy or standard. How can DeFi apps comply without KYC-ing everyone? Selective-disclosure credentials and ZK proofs allow users to prove they meet policy requirements (e.g., not on a sanctions list, country-eligible) without revealing identity. Front ends can verify proofs; smart contracts can enforce them on sensitive pools. Are mixers illegal? Legality varies by jurisdiction and use. Certain mixer contracts and related services have been sanctioned or targeted by regulators in the U.S., increasing user and counterparty risk. Users should understand local laws and service-provider policies before interacting. What’s the difference between ZK privacy and TEE privacy? ZK systems prove correct computation without revealing inputs and rely on cryptographic soundness. TEEs keep data secret inside hardware enclaves and rely on hardware trust and attestation. ZK offers stronger trust minimization; TEEs can be more performant but add hardware assumptions. Will privacy features make Ethereum less transparent for auditors? Not necessarily. Well-designed systems enable authorized audit via view keys, selective disclosure, or proofs of compliance, preserving public verifiability of rules while limiting unnecessary data exposure. What changes with EIP-4337 (account abstraction)? It enables smart wallets with programmable policies—spending limits, social recovery, and integrated credential checks. That makes it easier to embed ZK proofs and consented disclosures directly in wallets. How does MEV intersect with privacy? Public mempools expose intent, enabling MEV and privacy leakage. Private orderflow, encrypted mempools, and PBS research aim to reduce harmful MEV and give users more control, but design choices affect decentralization and inclusion. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes reveals Zcash (ZEC) is now the second-largest holding in his Maelstrom family office portfolio, citing rising surveillance as a key driver for financial privacy demand.

Key Takeaways : MANTA price surged toward $0.078. Our Manta price forecast expects Manta price to surge to a maximum level of $0.8 in 2026. In 2032, Manta price prediction expects Manta price to record a maximum level of $5. Launched in September 2023, Manta Network gained significant attention within the cryptocurrency community after its token generation event, leading to trending status on major coin aggregators and news outlets. Beyond the initial buzz, Manta Network presents innovative technology through a modular zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup for Ethereum , featuring Solidity smart contracts and a decentralized identity layer one network focusing on compliance. This article will explore the details of the Manta Network and examine potential future price movements of its native token, $MANTA, to provide a comprehensive MANTA price prediction. Overview Cryptocurrency Manta Network Ticker Symbol MANTA Price $0.078 Price Change 24H +0.3% Market Cap $30 Million Circulating Supply 465.43 Million MANTA Trading Volume 24H $6.74 Million All-Time High $4.08 (Mar 13, 2024) All-Time Low $0.053 (Oct 11, 2025) Manta Network: Technical Analysis Metric Value Current Price $0.078 Price Prediction $ 0.06055 (-25.23%) Fear & Greed Index 47 (Neutral) Sentiment Bearish Volatility 3.19% (Medium) Green Days 15/30 (50%) 50-Day SMA $ 0.06493 200-Day SMA $ 0.08112 14-Day RSI 53.54 (Neutral) MANTA Price Analysis: Manta faces bullish pressure toward $0.078 MANTA price analysis shows that MANTA price surged toward $0.078 Resistance for Manta is at $0.08185 Support for MANTA/USDT is at $0.07457 Manta price analysis 1-day chart: Manta surges toward $0.078 Analyzing the daily price chart of the MANTA token on 19 May, the coin is making an upward push toward $0.078. Currently, buyers are aiming for a hold above immediate Fib levels and they are strongly defending further declines. The 24-hour volume dropped to $693K, showing a decline in trading activity today. Manta is trading at $0.078, surging by over 0.2% in the last 24 hours. MANTAUSD Price Chart by TradingView The RSI-14 trend line has surged from its previous level and hovers around 57, showing that bulls are preparing to control price momentum. The SMA-14 level suggests volatility in the next few hours. Manta/USDT 4-hour price chart: Bears trigger selling pressure The 4-hour Manta price chart suggests MANTA continues to face bullish activity around EMA lines, creating a positive sentiment in the price chart. However, sellers aim for a correction by holding the price below the EMA20 trend line. MANTAUSD Price Chart by TradingView The BoP indicator trades in a positive region at 0.6, hinting that buyers are trying to build pressure near resistance levels and trigger an upward correction. Additionally, the MACD trend line has formed green candles above the signal line, and the indicator aims for positive momentum, strengthening bvuying positions. Manta Price Prediction: Levels and Action Daily Simple Moving Average (SMA) Period Value Action SMA 3 $ 0.06744 BUY SMA 5 $ 0.06758 SELL SMA 10 $ 0.06716 BUY SMA 21 $ 0.06648 BUY SMA 50 $ 0.06493 BUY SMA 100 $ 0.06793 SELL SMA 200 $ 0.08112 SELL Daily Exponential Moving Average (EMA) Period Value Action EMA 3 $ 0.06762 SELL EMA 5 $ 0.06755 SELL EMA 10 $ 0.06716 BUY EMA 21 $ 0.06645 BUY EMA 50 $ 0.06637 BUY EMA 100 $ 0.07123 SELL EMA 200 $ 0.09213 SELL What to expect from Manta price analysis next? The hourly price chart confirms that bears are making efforts to prevent the Manta price from an immediate surge. However, if the Manta price successfully breaks above $0.08185, it may surge higher and touch the resistance at $0.09096. MANTAUSD Price Chart by TradingView If bulls cannot initiate a surge, Manta’s price may drop below the immediate support line at $0.07457, resulting in a correction to $0.07011. Is MANTA a good investment? Manta’s rapid rise in DeFi TVL charts and alignment with Ethereum ‘s scaling roadmap via technologies like Manta Pacific suggest $MANTA’s potential. Grants support its ecosystem growth, and it leads in ZK technology adoption, promising for blockchain ‘s future. However, regulatory concerns over transaction privacy could affect its long-term viability, potentially impacting ZK protocols like $MANTA. Overall, Manta is a good investment if you want a profitable return in the long term. Why is the Manta price up today? Manta price triggered strong buying pressure after buyers maintained their demand. This resulted in a push toward $0.078. Will Manta price recover? If bulls hold the price above $0.08, we might see further recovery toward immediate resistance channels. Will Manta price reach $10? In recent months, the Manta network expanded its offerings and established multiple partnerships. If buying demand continues to increase in the coming years, its price might surpass the $10 mark by 2040. Will Manta reach $100? Depending on the current market sentiment, the Manta price might take several years to reach the $100 milestone. We expect the Manta price to achieve $100 by 2060. Will Manta reach $1000? $1000 is a distant dream for Manta price. However, if everything remains in favor of the altcoin market, we might even see the Manta price hitting $1K. Is Manta a good long-term investment? Investors are bullish on Manta, which has gained significant attention in recent months. If developers continue to build robust utilities for Manta and the roadmap fulfills user demand, it can be a good long-term investment option. Recent MANTA news/ opinions Manta Network will end staking rewards on 20 May 2026, stopping new MANTA token emissions and closing its inflationary staking model. Key timeline for Manta Staking: – Staking rewards will officially stop in two weeks on May 20, 2026, starting from today. – Operators may exit the program at any time starting immediately – After the deadline, no further network rewards will be generated — Manta Network (🔱,🔱) (@MantaNetwork) May 6, 2026 MANTA price prediction May 2026 If the altcoin market witnesses a surge in buying pressure this month, we might see a rebound in the MANTA price. In May, we expect Manta’s price to record a minimum of $0.06 and a maximum of $0.08. The average price is expected to be around $0.07. Manta Price Prediction Potential Low Potential Average Potential High Manta Price Prediction May 2026 $0.06 $0.07 $0.08 Manta price prediction 2026 Due to the impact of Bitcoin’s halving, Bitcoin and leading altcoins could reach new highs in 2026. However, some believe the event’s predictability changes because of crypto’s current popularity. Technical analysis indicates that in 2026, Manta Network is expected to reach a minimum price of $0.05. The MANTA token might attain a maximum price of $0.8, while the average trading price is $0.6. Manta Price Prediction Potential Low ($) Potential Average ($) Potential High ($) Manta Price Prediction 2026 0.05 0.6 0.8 Manta price predictions 2027-2032 Year Minimum Price ($) Average Price ($) Maximum Price ($) 2027 0.1 0.9 1.5 2028 0.7 1.6 2.2 2029 1.1 1.9 2.9 2030 1.8 2.6 3.5 2031 2.3 3.2 4.1 2032 3 4.3 5 MANTA Price Prediction for 2027 Ethereum upgrades will benefit Manta Network. With growing interest in privacy tech like ZK solutions, Manta Network is poised to grow, likely increasing its token value. In 2027, Manta Network is projected to have a minimum price of $0.10. The MANTA token is expected to reach a maximum price of $1.50, with an average price of $0.90. Manta Network Forecast 2028 By 2028, Manta Network is predicted to have a minimum value of $0.70. It may reach a maximum value of $2.20, with an average trading price of $1.60. Manta Network Price Prediction 2029 Through a detailed technical analysis of past price data, Manta Network is estimated to reach a minimum price of $1.10 in 2029. The token could see a maximum price of $2.90, with an average trading price of $1.90. Manta Price Prediction 2030 In 2030, the minimum expected price for one Manta Network token is projected to be $1.80. The maximum price could reach $3.50, with an average trading price of $2.60. Manta Price Prediction 2031 For 2031, the Manta price prediction indicates a minimum of $2.30. According to projections, the MANTA token could achieve a maximum of $4.10, with an average forecast price of $3.20. Manta Price Prediction 2032 In 2032, the minimum expected price for one Manta Network token is projected to be $3.00. The maximum price could reach $5.00, with an average trading price of $4.30. Manta price prediction 2026-2032 Manta Network Price Prediction: Analysts’ MANTA Price Forecast Firm Name 2026 2027 Coincodex $0.2162 $0.1772 DigitalCoinPrice $0.14 $0.19 Cryptopolitan’s Manta Price Prediction At Cryptopolitan, we are bullish on Manta’s price prediction as it flashes bullish on-chain signals amid growing buying demand. Investors are keenly watching the Manta Network market to discern potential movements in its future price trends and analyze changes in Manta Network’s price. Technical analysis indicates that in 2026, Manta Network is expected to reach a minimum price of $0.05. The MANTA token might attain a maximum price of $0.8, while the average trading price is $0.6. Manta Historic Price Sentiment Manta Historic Price Sentiment January 18, 2024: MANTA launched on the open market at approximately $2.24. January 22, 2024: Price rose steadily, exceeding $2.70 before retracting to $2.40. Bullish Rebound: The following months showed a strong upward trend, with MANTA reaching an all-time high of $4 in March. April Decline: Momentum faded, and the price declined below $2. In May, the price of Manta rebounded and is aimed for a retest of the $2 mark. In recent weeks of June, Manta price declined heavily and dropped below the $1 mark. In July, Manta price continued its bearish move as it settled below the $1 mark. In August, the price of Manta surged toward $0.86; however, it later dropped toward $0.6. In September, Manta surged toward the $0.97 high only to face a rejection. In October, the price of Manta surged toward $0.85; however, it failed to maintain that momentum. In November, the MANTA price surged above $1.2 and is currently maintaining above that level. In December, Manta price dropped toward the low of $0.82. Though Manta started 2025 on a bullish note, it failed to hold its momentum. As a result, the price lost its $1 mark and crashed toward the low of $0.28 in early March. By the end of March, the price dropped further below $0.2. In April, the price surged toward the high of $0.25 but it later dropped. In May, the price of Manta surged toward the high of $0.35 but failed to maintain the momentum. As a result, Manta declined toward $0.22 in early June. By the end of June, MANTA price dropped toward $0.19. In July, MANTA price surged toward $0.26 but it later declined below $0.2 in early August. By the end of August, the price of MANTA again dropped below $0.2. By September’s end, MANTA price declined below $0.17. By the end of October, MANTA price dropped below $0.1. Throughout November, the price consolidated around $0.1. In December, the price of MANTA dropped significantly toward the low of $0.07. Currently, MANTA is maintaining its price around $0.08 throughout January 2026. The price of MANTA continued to consolidate around $0.08 in early February. By the end of February, the MANTA price dropped toward $0.058. In March, MANTA fluctuated a lot, ending at $0.061. In April, MANTA surged toward $0.073.

As per Crypto Events Global data, the leading conferences of this week include Vienna Blockchain Week, ETHMilan, and several Bitcoin events.

BitcoinWorld Brevis Achieves 5.3x Speed Boost in Ethereum ZK Block Proof Generation Brevis, a smart contract platform built on zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup technology, has unveiled Pico Prism 2.0 — a major upgrade that slashes the average time required to generate ZK proofs for Ethereum blocks. According to a report from BlockBeats, the new system achieves an average proof generation time of approximately 6.1 seconds per block, with 99.9% of proofs completing within Ethereum’s 12-second block interval. This marks a 5.3-fold improvement in computational efficiency compared to its predecessor, Pico Prism 1.0, under similar testing conditions. Real-Time ZK Proofs Move Closer to Practical Reality The significance of this milestone extends beyond raw performance metrics. Zero-knowledge proofs are a cornerstone of Ethereum scaling, enabling rollups to process transactions off-chain while maintaining security guarantees on the mainnet. However, the computational cost of generating these proofs has historically been a bottleneck, often introducing delays that undermined the user experience. Pico Prism 2.0’s ability to generate proofs within the 12-second block window means that ZK rollups can now operate in near real-time, bringing them closer to the performance levels expected by mainstream decentralized applications. Brevis’ achievement is particularly relevant as the Ethereum ecosystem continues to grapple with congestion and high gas fees. Faster proof generation directly translates to lower latency for end-users and reduced operational costs for rollup operators. The 5.3x efficiency gain suggests that the underlying cryptographic optimizations — likely involving parallelized computation and improved circuit design — are yielding tangible results. Context and Competitive Landscape The race to optimize ZK proof generation has intensified over the past year. Competitors including StarkWare, zkSync, and Polygon have all announced performance improvements, but Brevis’ focus on block-level proof times sets a new benchmark. Pico Prism 2.0’s 6.1-second average is notably faster than many existing implementations, which often require 30 seconds or more for equivalent workloads. It is important to note that these results were achieved under controlled test conditions. Real-world performance may vary depending on network congestion, transaction complexity, and hardware configurations. Nonetheless, the consistency of the results — with 99.9% of proofs completing within the block interval — suggests a robust and production-ready system. What This Means for Developers and Users For developers building on ZK rollups, faster proof generation reduces the friction associated with cross-chain communication and state updates. Applications such as decentralized exchanges, gaming platforms, and identity verification systems stand to benefit from lower latency. For end-users, the improvement is likely to be invisible but impactful: faster confirmations, lower fees, and a smoother overall experience. The broader implication is that ZK rollups are maturing from experimental infrastructure into viable scaling solutions. Brevis’ announcement reinforces the narrative that zero-knowledge technology is not just theoretically elegant but practically deployable at scale. Conclusion Brevis’ Pico Prism 2.0 represents a meaningful step forward in the practical implementation of zero-knowledge proofs on Ethereum. By demonstrating that ZK block proofs can be generated reliably within a 12-second window, the company has addressed one of the key technical hurdles facing rollup adoption. As the Ethereum ecosystem continues to prioritize scalability, such innovations will play a critical role in shaping the next generation of decentralized applications. FAQs Q1: What is a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof in the context of Ethereum? A ZK proof is a cryptographic method that allows one party to prove to another that a statement is true without revealing any underlying data. In Ethereum scaling, ZK proofs enable rollups to verify batches of off-chain transactions efficiently on the mainnet. Q2: Why is proof generation speed important for ZK rollups? Faster proof generation reduces the time it takes for transactions to be finalized on Ethereum. It directly impacts user experience by lowering latency and enabling near-instant confirmations, which is critical for applications like payments and trading. Q3: How does Pico Prism 2.0 compare to other ZK proof systems? Pico Prism 2.0’s 6.1-second average proof time is among the fastest reported for Ethereum block-level proofs. Most existing systems require 20–60 seconds under similar conditions, making Brevis’ achievement a notable improvement. This post Brevis Achieves 5.3x Speed Boost in Ethereum ZK Block Proof Generation first appeared on BitcoinWorld .