ZK

zkSync

BitcoinWorld ZKSync Lite Shutdown: The Inevitable Sunset of Ethereum’s Pioneering Zero-Knowledge Rollup In a significant milestone for Ethereum’s scaling evolution, the ZKSync Lite network will permanently cease operations on May 4, 2025. This decisive shutdown, first reported by The Block, concludes the lifecycle of the protocol widely recognized as Ethereum’s inaugural zero-knowledge rollup. Consequently, the development team will halt all block production and freeze the network state on that date. While users retain the ability to claim the approximately $33.9 million in bridged assets after the shutdown, experts strongly advise withdrawing funds before the deadline to ensure a seamless transition. Understanding the ZKSync Lite Shutdown Timeline The official ZKSync Lite shutdown date of May 4, 2025, represents the final step in a planned technological migration. Development on the Lite version effectively concluded in March 2023 following the successful launch of ZKSync Era, its more advanced successor. This two-year sunset period provided users and developers with ample time to migrate their assets and applications. The network freeze will render the chain immutable, preventing any new transactions from being processed. Therefore, all user activity must conclude before this definitive endpoint. Matter Labs, the development entity behind the ZKsync ecosystem, has maintained clear communication regarding this transition. The company has consistently directed its community and resources toward ZKSync Era since its debut. This strategic focus reflects a common pattern in blockchain development, where foundational but limited prototypes give way to more robust, feature-complete platforms. The shutdown process itself is designed to be orderly, prioritizing the security of user funds throughout the finalization phase. The Technical Rationale Behind the Sunset ZKSync Lite served a critical historical function by demonstrating the practical viability of ZK-rollups on Ethereum. However, its architecture lacked support for smart contracts, limiting its utility to simple token transfers. The launch of ZKSync Era introduced a fully programmable environment with a virtual machine, enabling complex decentralized applications (dApps). This fundamental upgrade made the original Lite network functionally obsolete for most modern blockchain use cases. The decision to sunset Lite consolidates network effects, security, and developer attention on the more capable Era chain. User Guide: Withdrawing Assets Before the Shutdown Users holding assets on ZKSync Lite must take proactive steps before the May 4 shutdown. The process involves bridging funds back to the Ethereum mainnet. First, connect your wallet to the official ZKSync Lite portal. Next, initiate a withdrawal transaction, which will require a small amount of ETH to cover gas fees on the destination network. Finally, confirm the transaction and wait for the standard challenge period, after which funds will arrive in your Ethereum wallet. Primary Action: Withdraw all funds before May 4, 2025. Post-Shutdown Access: Claim functionality remains for bridged assets, but the process may be less intuitive. Asset Security: No assets will be lost; the bridge contracts remain operable. Recommended Deadline: Complete withdrawals by April 27 to avoid last-minute congestion. Approximately $33.9 million in various assets, primarily stablecoins and ETH, currently resides on the Lite network. Delaying withdrawal risks encountering technical issues or network congestion as the deadline approaches. Proactive migration ensures a smooth user experience and immediate access to liquidity on more active networks like ZKSync Era or Ethereum mainnet. ZKSync Era: The Evolution Beyond the Lite Network The ZKSync Lite shutdown directly results from the successful deployment and adoption of ZKSync Era. Launched in March 2023, Era is a Type 4 zkEVM (zero-knowledge Ethereum Virtual Machine). This means it offers high compatibility with Ethereum’s programming environment while leveraging advanced zero-knowledge proof technology for scaling. Consequently, developers can port existing Ethereum smart contracts to Era with minimal modifications, a feature the original Lite network could not support. The technological leap between the two networks is substantial. The following table outlines the core differences: Feature ZKSync Lite ZKSync Era Launch Date 2020 March 2023 Core Function Simple Payments & Transfers Full Smart Contract Support Technology Basic ZK Rollup zkEVM (Type 4) Status Sunsetting May 2025 Actively Developed Mainnet Total Value Locked (TVL) ~$33.9M Billions (Ecosystem-wide) This evolution mirrors the broader trajectory of Ethereum scaling, where initial solutions focus on a single problem before expanding into general-purpose platforms. The migration of value and activity from Lite to Era validates this iterative development model within the ZKsync ecosystem. The Historical Impact of Ethereum’s First ZK Rollup ZKSync Lite’s legacy extends far beyond its upcoming shutdown. As the first functional zero-knowledge rollup on Ethereum, it provided the first real-world proof that ZK technology could securely scale the network. It demonstrated that transactions could be batched and verified off-chain with cryptographic guarantees, then settled on Ethereum with drastically reduced cost and latency. This pioneering work de-risked the concept for later, more complex implementations developed by Matter Labs and other teams in the space. Furthermore, ZKSync Lite processed millions of transactions, saving users significant amounts in gas fees compared to the Ethereum mainnet. It served as a vital educational tool, introducing countless users and developers to the principles of layer-2 scaling and zero-knowledge cryptography. Its operational history provided invaluable data on user behavior, security models, and economic incentives, all of which informed the design of ZKSync Era and competing ZK-rollup projects. Expert Perspective on Network Lifecycles Blockchain analysts view the ZKSync Lite shutdown as a sign of ecosystem maturity. “The deliberate sunsetting of a foundational but limited network is a healthy process,” notes a researcher from a major blockchain analytics firm. “It shows a project is evolving beyond its prototype phase and is confident in its upgraded technology. The key is managing the transition with clear communication and robust user support, which the ZKSync team appears to be doing.” This managed obsolescence allows developers to concentrate security audits, innovation, and community resources on a single, superior network, ultimately strengthening the entire ecosystem. Conclusion The ZKSync Lite shutdown on May 4, 2025, marks the end of a foundational chapter in Ethereum scaling. This planned decommissioning highlights the rapid evolution from specialized scaling solutions to full-featured, smart contract-enabled platforms like ZKSync Era. Users must prioritize withdrawing their assets before the deadline to ensure a hassle-free experience. Ultimately, the legacy of ZKSync Lite is secure as the pioneering zero-knowledge rollup that proved the model’s viability, paving the way for the next generation of efficient, scalable Ethereum layer-2 networks. FAQs Q1: What happens if I don’t withdraw my funds from ZKSync Lite by May 4? Your funds remain safe and can still be claimed via the bridge contracts after the shutdown. However, the user interface and process may be less straightforward, so withdrawing before the deadline is strongly recommended. Q2: Can I still use ZKSync Lite for transactions after the shutdown? No. The network will be frozen, meaning block production halts. You will not be able to send new transactions or interact with the chain state after May 4, 2025. Q3: What is the difference between ZKSync Lite and ZKSync Era? ZKSync Lite was a simple payment-focused ZK rollup. ZKSync Era is a zkEVM that supports full smart contract functionality, allowing for complex decentralized applications (dApps), NFTs, and DeFi protocols. Q4: Where should I move my assets after withdrawing from ZKSync Lite? You can bridge them to the Ethereum mainnet or, for continued low-fee transactions, bridge them directly to ZKSync Era using the official ZKSync portal, which supports migration between the networks. Q5: Why is ZKSync Lite being shut down? Development shifted entirely to ZKSync Era in March 2023. Maintaining two networks divides security focus and developer resources. Sunsetting the obsolete Lite network allows the team to concentrate on advancing the more capable and widely adopted Era network. This post ZKSync Lite Shutdown: The Inevitable Sunset of Ethereum’s Pioneering Zero-Knowledge Rollup first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Vitalik Buterin identified 4 weak areas against quantum threats to ETH: signatures, storage, accounts, and ZK proofs. He suggested lean signatures, STARKs, and recursive aggregation. Foundation tre...

Grvt, a privacy-focused decentralized exchange built on its own zero-knowledge appchain using the ZKsync stack, has announced an integration with decentralized lending protocol Aave that allows traders to earn yield on posted collateral while maintaining open trading positions. The company said the feature introduces “composable yield” to perpetual futures trading. Through the integration, eligible collateral deposited for margin trading can generate returns linked to Aave’s lending markets without interrupting active positions. Grvt stated that, based on its internal review of publicly disclosed integrations as of February 2026, this is the first instance of a perpetual futures decentralized exchange embedding an external yield source directly into trading collateral while keeping trading live under normal operating conditions. Collateral designed to remain productive In traditional perpetual trading, users typically post collateral that remains idle to satisfy margin requirements. Grvt’s system seeks to change that structure through a mechanism called ONE Balance, its yield engine designed to connect trading collateral to external on-chain yield sources. Under the new model, collateral can continue to support leveraged trading positions while simultaneously earning protocol-native returns. The company said yields could reach up to 11%, depending on prevailing on-chain market conditions. The integration remains fully on-chain and trustless under standard operating conditions, according to Grvt. The objective is to reduce the opportunity cost of maintaining margin balances and allow traders to pursue market exposure and yield from a single account. “Most platforms focus on one dimension of capital: utility. By listing more markets, they give you more places to put your money to work,” said Hong, chief executive officer of Grvt. “We are focused on the second, equally critical dimension: productivity. By embedding Aave’s yield-bearing infrastructure directly into our trading engine, we are fundamentally increasing the intrinsic value of every dollar deposited on Grvt.” Aave provides lending liquidity layer Aave, described as the largest decentralized lending network, serves as the yield source for the integration. The protocol’s lending markets supply the liquidity used to generate returns on collateral, while TokenLogic — a financial architect within the Aave ecosystem — manages capital optimization behind the scenes. From a user perspective, collateral can remain on the exchange for trading while simultaneously earning yield through Aave-linked lending activity. The company said this structure aligns returns with real-time on-chain market conditions and removes the need to move funds between platforms. “Stablecoins that aren’t earning yield are an opportunity cost for traders. Aave has the deepest liquidity and most consistent rates in DeFi, and its yields have become the industry’s benchmark. This integration lets Grvt users earn on their collateral while they trade, a major capital efficiency improvement,” said Stani Kulechov, founder and CEO of Aave Labs. The integration also extends Aave’s lending markets to derivatives traders on decentralized exchanges and broadens the use of on-chain credit infrastructure within DeFi trading platforms. Broader fintech ambitions Alongside the integration, Grvt released a redesigned mobile trading application with improved navigation, clearer portfolio visibility and enhanced risk-management tools aimed at active traders. The company said the partnership forms part of a wider roadmap to expand beyond perpetual futures trading toward a broader on-chain brokerage model. The vision is to combine trading, earning and investing into a single system where capital remains continuously productive. Grvt argues that infrastructure such as ZK-rollups enables financial services to operate at internet scale, while protocols like Aave demonstrate transparent lending markets. By combining both, the platform aims to build a unified trading environment in which self-custody remains standard and collateral no longer sits idle. The firm described the long-term objective as a migration toward on-chain financial rails where trading and yield generation occur simultaneously as default user behavior. The post Grvt integrates Aave yield into perp DEX collateral on ZKsync stack appeared first on Invezz

BitcoinWorld Brevis Pico Prism Shatters Expectations, Proving 99% of Ethereum Blocks with Just 16 GPUs In a stunning technological leap that redefines blockchain efficiency, zero-knowledge verification pioneer Brevis has announced its Pico Prism zkVM now proves over 99% of Ethereum blocks in real time using a mere 16 GPUs. This breakthrough, achieved in early 2025, slashes previous hardware requirements by 75% and signals a pivotal moment for scalable, trustless blockchain infrastructure. The development directly addresses one of the most significant bottlenecks in Web3 adoption: the cost and complexity of cryptographic verification. Brevis Pico Prism Achieves Unprecedented Ethereum Verification Efficiency The core announcement from Brevis centers on a monumental optimization of its zero-knowledge virtual machine. Previously, in October 2024, the system required 64 high-end GPUs distributed across eight servers to achieve similar real-time verification coverage. Now, the refined Pico Prism architecture accomplishes the same critical task—proving the validity of Ethereum’s complex state transitions—with just 16 next-generation RTX 5090 GPUs housed on two machines. Consequently, this represents a four-fold improvement in hardware density and utilization. Importantly, this efficiency gain did not compromise performance. The average proof generation time holds steady at 6.91 seconds per block. This consistency is crucial for maintaining synchronicity with Ethereum’s ~12-second block time. The real victory, however, lies in the dramatic cost reduction. The GPU cost for the necessary processing power plummeted from approximately $128,000 to $32,000. When combined with other essential server components, the total hardware expenditure for a real-time proving node now aligns with the Ethereum Foundation’s stated capital expenditure target of around $100,000. The Technical Evolution of Zero-Knowledge Virtual Machines To appreciate this milestone, one must understand the role of a zkVM. A zero-knowledge virtual machine allows one party to prove to another that a computation was executed correctly without revealing any underlying data. For Ethereum, this means generating a cryptographic proof that all transactions in a block are valid, all smart contract logic was followed, and the resulting state root is correct. This proof, known as a zk-SNARK or zk-STARK, is tiny and can be verified almost instantly by anyone. Brevis’s Pico Prism is a specialized zkVM optimized for this exact task. The 2025 breakthrough stems from advancements in several key areas: Proof Circuit Optimization: Engineers redesigned the arithmetic circuits that represent Ethereum’s execution, minimizing redundant operations and parallelizing processes. GPU Kernel Refactoring: New compute kernels for the RTX 5090s leverage their enhanced tensor and ray-tracing cores for cryptographic operations previously handled by standard CUDA cores. Memory Hierarchy Management: Improved data fetching and caching strategies drastically reduced latency between the GPU’s VRAM and its processing units during proof generation. Software-Hardware Co-Design: The Pico Prism software stack was rewritten to fully exploit the micro-architectural improvements of the latest GPU generation. Context and Impact on Ethereum’s Roadmap This development is not an isolated achievement. It fits directly into Ethereum’s long-term scaling vision, often called “The Surge.” A primary goal is to enable cheap, high-throughput layer-2 rollups—like Optimistic and ZK Rollups—that settle their bundled transactions back to Ethereum Mainnet. Efficient zkVMs are the engine for ZK Rollups. By making real-time block verification more accessible, Brevis lowers the barrier to entry for rollup operators and strengthens the security and decentralization of the entire L2 ecosystem. Furthermore, real-time verification is a cornerstone for future concepts like “enshrined zkEVM” or ultra-light clients. A user could theoretically run a full trustless node on a smartphone by simply downloading and verifying these small zk proofs instead of petabytes of historical data. Brevis’s cost reduction makes the infrastructure for generating those proofs economically viable for more participants, preventing centralization around a few wealthy proving services. Economic and Environmental Implications of Reduced Hardware The shift from 64 to 16 GPUs carries significant secondary benefits. First, the operational expenditure (opex) for running the prover nodes drops substantially. Lower power consumption, reduced cooling needs, and smaller physical footprints make deploying this infrastructure more sustainable and less costly over time. In an industry increasingly scrutinized for its energy use, such efficiency gains are critically important for public perception and regulatory compliance. Second, it democratizes access. A $100,000 server rack is a serious investment, but it is within reach for medium-sized staking pools, academic institutions, and dedicated DAOs. The previous $400,000+ hardware cost effectively restricted this tier of infrastructure to large corporations and well-funded foundations. The new benchmark opens the door for a more geographically and politically distributed proving network, enhancing Ethereum’s censorship resistance. Brevis Pico Prism Hardware Evolution (2024 vs. 2025) Metric October 2024 Early 2025 Improvement GPUs Required 64 16 -75% Servers Required 8 2 -75% Estimated GPU Cost $128,000 $32,000 -75% Total Hardware Cost >$400,000 ~$100,000 ~-75% Block Coverage >99% >99% Maintained Avg. Proof Time 6.91s 6.91s Maintained The Competitive Landscape and Future Trajectory Brevis operates in a competitive field with other notable zkVM and proving projects like Risc Zero, SP1, and zkSync’s Boojum. This announcement pressures the entire sector to pursue similar hardware efficiency gains. The focus is shifting from purely theoretical cryptographic advances to practical, systems-level engineering that reduces the total cost of ownership. The race is now about proving performance per watt and per dollar, not just proof size or verification speed. Looking ahead, the trajectory suggests further consolidation. Industry observers anticipate that within 18-24 months, similar proving capabilities may be achievable on a single, highly specialized server or even via decentralized networks of consumer-grade hardware. The end goal is to make trustless verification a background process that is virtually free and invisible to end-users, thereby unlocking the full potential of decentralized applications. Conclusion Brevis’s announcement regarding its Pico Prism zkVM marks a definitive step toward a more scalable and accessible Ethereum ecosystem. By proving 99% of Ethereum blocks with just 16 GPUs, the company has dramatically lowered the economic and physical barriers to participating in critical blockchain infrastructure. This achievement in zero-knowledge verification computing not only meets a key Ethereum Foundation benchmark but also injects momentum into the broader push for efficient, trustless Web3 systems. The focus now shifts to how this enhanced efficiency will propagate through layer-2 networks and empower the next generation of decentralized applications. FAQs Q1: What does it mean to “prove” an Ethereum block? A zero-knowledge proof cryptographically verifies that all transactions in a block are valid and the new state of the blockchain is correct, without needing to re-execute every transaction. It’s a tiny certificate of correctness. Q2: Why is reducing the GPU count from 64 to 16 so significant? It directly cuts the capital cost, power consumption, and physical space needed to run this infrastructure by about 75%. This makes operating a prover node more affordable and sustainable, promoting decentralization. Q3: Does this technology affect ordinary Ethereum users or traders? Indirectly, yes. More efficient proving lowers costs for layer-2 rollups, which can lead to cheaper transaction fees for users. It also strengthens the overall security and trustlessness of the network. Q4: What is a zkVM (zero-knowledge virtual machine)? A zkVM is a software environment that can execute arbitrary programs (like Ethereum smart contracts) and generate a cryptographic proof that the execution was performed correctly, revealing only the output, not the internal computations. Q5: What is the Ethereum Foundation’s “capex target” mentioned by Brevis? It refers to a goal set by Ethereum researchers for the capital expenditure required to build hardware capable of generating real-time zk proofs for Ethereum blocks. Brevis’s ~$100,000 system now meets this target, making the technology commercially viable. This post Brevis Pico Prism Shatters Expectations, Proving 99% of Ethereum Blocks with Just 16 GPUs first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

ZK market structure with LH/LL in bearish downtrend; $0.0179 support critical. Above $0.0201 BOS brings bullish CHoCH, BTC downtrend increases altcoin risk.

Key Takeaways : MANTA price dropped toward $0.063. Our Manta price forecast expects Manta price to surge to a maximum level of $0.8 in 2026. In 2032, Manta price prediction expects Manta price to record a maximum level of $5. Launched in September 2023, Manta Network gained significant attention within the cryptocurrency community after its token generation event, leading to trending status on major coin aggregators and news outlets. Beyond the initial buzz, Manta Network presents innovative technology through a modular zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup for Ethereum , featuring Solidity smart contracts and a decentralized identity layer one network focusing on compliance. This article will explore the details of the Manta Network and examine potential future price movements of its native token, $MANTA, to provide a comprehensive MANTA price prediction. Overview Cryptocurrency Manta Network Ticker Symbol MANTA Price $0.063 Price Change 24H -1.3% Market Cap $126.27 Million Circulating Supply 415.29 Million MANTA Trading Volume 24H $21.5 Million All-Time High $4.08 (Mar 13, 2024) All-Time Low $0.053 (Oct 11, 2025) Manta Network: Technical Analysis Metric Value Current Price $0.063 Price Prediction $ 0.06099 (-5.14%) Fear & Greed Index 9 (Extreme Fear) Sentiment Neutral Volatility 6.75% (High) Green Days 15/30 (50%) 50-Day SMA $ 0.07929 200-Day SMA $ 0.1363 14-Day RSI 55.21 (Neutral) MANTA Price Analysis: Manta faces bearish pressure toward $0.063 MANTA price analysis shows that MANTA price dropped toward $0.063 Resistance for Manta is at $0.0671 Support for MANTA/USDT is at $0.0619 Manta price analysis 1-day chart: Manta declines toward $0.063 Analyzing the daily price chart of the MANTA token on 24 February, the coin is making a downward push toward $0.063. Currently, sellers are aiming for a hold below immediate Fib levels and they are strongly defending further surges. The 24-hour volume dropped to $442 million, showing a decline in trading activity today. Manta is trading at $0.063, declining by over 1.3% in the last 24 hours. The RSI-14 trend line has dropped from its previous level and hovers around 38, showing that bears are controlling the momentum of the price. The SMA-14 level suggests volatility in the next few hours. Manta/USDT 4-hour price chart: Bulls trigger buying demand The 4-hour Manta price chart suggests MANTA continues to face bearish activity around EMA lines, creating a negative sentiment on the price chart. Currently, buyers aim for a surge by holding the price above the EMA20 trend line. MANTAUSD Price Chart by TradingView The BoP indicator trades in a positive region at 0.14, hinting that buyers are trying to build pressure near resistance levels and boost an upward correction. However, the MACD trend line has formed red candles below the signal line, and the indicator aims for negative momentum, strengthening bearish positions. Manta Price Prediction: Levels and Action Daily Simple Moving Average (SMA) Period Value Action SMA 3 $ 0.07978 BUY SMA 5 $ 0.07375 BUY SMA 10 $ 0.07139 BUY SMA 21 $ 0.07401 BUY SMA 50 $ 0.07929 BUY SMA 100 $ 0.09031 SELL SMA 200 $ 0.1363 SELL Daily Exponential Moving Average (EMA) Period Value Action EMA 3 $ 0.07556 BUY EMA 5 $ 0.07734 BUY EMA 10 $ 0.07861 BUY EMA 21 $ 0.07953 BUY EMA 50 $ 0.08834 SELL EMA 100 $ 0.1105 SELL EMA 200 $ 0.1688 SELL What to expect from Manta price analysis next? The hourly price chart confirms that bears are making efforts to prevent the Manta price from an immediate surge. However, if the Manta price successfully breaks above $0.0671, it may surge higher and touch the resistance at $0.0734. MANTAUSD Price Chart by TradingView If bulls cannot initiate a surge, Manta’s price may drop below the immediate support line at $0.0619, resulting in a correction to $0.0568. Is MANTA a good investment? Manta’s rapid rise in DeFi TVL charts and alignment with Ethereum ‘s scaling roadmap via technologies like Manta Pacific suggest $MANTA’s potential. Grants support its ecosystem growth, and it leads in ZK technology adoption, promising for blockchain ‘s future. However, regulatory concerns over transaction privacy could affect its long-term viability, potentially impacting ZK protocols like $MANTA. Overall, Manta is a good investment if you want a profitable return in the long term. Why is the Manta price down today? Manta price triggered strong selling pressure after buyers failed to maintain demand. This resulted in a decline toward $0.063. Will Manta price recover? If bulls hold the price above $0.07, we might see further recovery toward immediate resistance channels. Will Manta price reach $10? In recent months, the Manta network expanded its offerings and established multiple partnerships. If buying demand continues to increase in the coming years, its price might surpass the $10 mark by 2040. Will Manta reach $100? Depending on the current market sentiment, the Manta price might take several years to reach the $100 milestone. We expect the Manta price to achieve $100 by 2060. Will Manta reach $1000? $1000 is a distant dream for Manta price. However, if everything remains in favor of the altcoin market, we might even see the Manta price hitting $1K. Is Manta a good long-term investment? Investors are bullish on Manta, which has gained significant attention in recent months. If developers continue to build robust utilities for Manta and the roadmap fulfills user demand, it can be a good long-term investment option. Recent MANTA news/ opinions Manta Network–incubated AI metaphysics app Superfortune has launched its Web2 app on Google Play, expanding into the consumer market with AI-powered Bazi and Feng Shui services. An iOS release is coming soon, following its earlier Burn-to-Earn collaboration with Trust Wallet and Four Meme. Manta Network 孵化的 AI 玄学应用 superfortune 宣布推出 Web2 APP 应用，将业务重心拓展至 Web2 消费市场，增加现有项目收入。该应用基于 AI 技术提供八字、风水等个性化服务。新应用已在 Google Play 上线，iOS 版本计划近期发布。此前，superfortune 还与 Trust Wallet、Four meme 推出链上… — 吴说区块链 (@wublockchain12) December 15, 2025 MANTA price prediction February 2026 If the altcoin market witnesses a surge in buying pressure this month, we might see a rebound in the MANTA price. In February, we expect Manta’s price to record a minimum of $0.07 and a maximum of $0.11. The average price is expected to be around $0.09. Manta Price Prediction Potential Low Potential Average Potential High Manta Price Prediction February 2026 $0.07 $0.09 $0.11 Manta price prediction 2026 Due to the impact of Bitcoin’s halving, Bitcoin and leading altcoins could reach new highs in 2026. However, some believe the event’s predictability changes because of crypto’s current popularity. Technical analysis indicates that in 2026, Manta Network is expected to reach a minimum price of $0.05. The MANTA token might attain a maximum price of $0.8, while the average trading price is $0.6. Manta Price Prediction Potential Low ($) Potential Average ($) Potential High ($) Manta Price Prediction 2026 0.05 0.6 0.8 Manta price predictions 2027-2032 Year Minimum Price ($) Average Price ($) Maximum Price ($) 2027 0.1 0.9 1.5 2028 0.7 1.6 2.2 2029 1.1 1.9 2.9 2030 1.8 2.6 3.5 2031 2.3 3.2 4.1 2032 3 4.3 5 MANTA Price Prediction for 2027 Ethereum upgrades will benefit Manta Network. With growing interest in privacy tech like ZK solutions, Manta Network is poised to grow, likely increasing its token value. In 2027, Manta Network is projected to have a minimum price of $0.10. The MANTA token is expected to reach a maximum price of $1.50, with an average price of $0.90. Manta Network Forecast 2028 By 2028, Manta Network is predicted to have a minimum value of $0.70. It may reach a maximum value of $2.20, with an average trading price of $1.60. Manta Network Price Prediction 2029 Through a detailed technical analysis of past price data, Manta Network is estimated to reach a minimum price of $1.10 in 2029. The token could see a maximum price of $2.90, with an average trading price of $1.90. Manta Price Prediction 2030 In 2030, the minimum expected price for one Manta Network token is projected to be $1.80. The maximum price could reach $3.50, with an average trading price of $2.60. Manta Price Prediction 2031 For 2031, the Manta price prediction indicates a minimum of $2.30. According to projections, the MANTA token could achieve a maximum of $4.10, with an average forecast price of $3.20. Manta Price Prediction 2032 In 2032, the minimum expected price for one Manta Network token is projected to be $3.00. The maximum price could reach $5.00, with an average trading price of $4.30. Manta price prediction 2026-2032 Manta Network Price Prediction: Analysts’ MANTA Price Forecast Firm Name 2026 2027 Coincodex $0.2162 $0.1772 DigitalCoinPrice $0.14 $0.19 Cryptopolitan’s Manta Price Prediction At Cryptopolitan, we are bullish on Manta’s price prediction as it flashes bullish on-chain signals amid growing buying demand. Investors are keenly watching the Manta Network market to discern potential movements in its future price trends and analyze changes in Manta Network’s price. Technical analysis indicates that in 2026, Manta Network is expected to reach a minimum price of $0.05. The MANTA token might attain a maximum price of $0.8, while the average trading price is $0.6. Manta Historic Price Sentiment Manta Historic Price Sentiment January 18, 2024: MANTA launched on the open market at approximately $2.24. January 22, 2024: Price rose steadily, exceeding $2.70 before retracting to $2.40. Bullish Rebound: The following months showed a strong upward trend, with MANTA reaching an all-time high of $4 in March. April Decline: Momentum faded, and the price declined below $2. In May, the price of Manta rebounded and is aimed for a retest of the $2 mark. In recent weeks of June, Manta price declined heavily and dropped below the $1 mark. In July, Manta price continued its bearish move as it settled below the $1 mark. In August, the price of Manta surged toward $0.86; however, it later dropped toward $0.6. In September, Manta surged toward the $0.97 high only to face a rejection. In October, the price of Manta surged toward $0.85; however, it failed to maintain that momentum. In November, the MANTA price surged above $1.2 and is currently maintaining above that level. In December, Manta price dropped toward the low of $0.82. Though Manta started 2025 on a bullish note, it failed to hold its momentum. As a result, the price lost its $1 mark and crashed toward the low of $0.28 in early March. By the end of March, the price dropped further below $0.2. In April, the price surged toward the high of $0.25 but it later dropped. In May, the price of Manta surged toward the high of $0.35 but failed to maintain the momentum. As a result, Manta declined toward $0.22 in early June. By the end of June, MANTA price dropped toward $0.19. In July, MANTA price surged toward $0.26 but it later declined below $0.2 in early August. By the end of August, the price of MANTA again dropped below $0.2. By September’s end, MANTA price declined below $0.17. By the end of October, MANTA price dropped below $0.1. Throughout November, the price consolidated around $0.1. In December, the price of MANTA dropped significantly toward the low of $0.07. Currently, MANTA is maintaining its price around $0.08 throughout January 2026. The price of MANTA continued to consolidate around $0.08 in early February.

zERC20 launched zBNB on BNB Chain, enabling private transactions with advanced cryptographic safeguards. User privacy is maintained through ZK Proof-of-Burn technology and irreversible token burning mechanisms. Continue Reading: zERC20 Team Launches zBNB on BNB Chain to Boost User Privacy The post zERC20 Team Launches zBNB on BNB Chain to Boost User Privacy appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

Ethereum’s recent protocol upgrades suggest more than incremental improvements as high-performance competitors chip away at its dominance. Vitalik Buterin detailed the plan to build what he called a “cypherpunk principled non-ugly Ethereum” — not as a replacement chain, but as a tightly integrated evolution of the existing system. The proposal follows ETH developers formally scheduling Fork-Choice Enforced Inclusion Lists (FOCIL) for the forthcoming Hegota hard fork (currently targeted for late 2026). And with account abstraction updates and long-term architectural changes, that transition signals a broader recalibration of Ethereum’s roadmap at a time when rivals are catching up. The development comes as BNP Paribas Asset Management taps Ethereum for a new blockchain pilot, this time issuing a tokenised share class of a French‑domiciled money market fund. The tokenized shares, issued onchain using BNP Paribas’ AssetFoundryTM platform, will give gated access via a “permissioned access model on ETH … whereby holdings and transfers are restricted to eligible and authorised participants, in line with applicable regulatory requirements,” according to the announcement. Ethereum targets rival chains with Base-Layer overhaul and ZK integration FOCIL, known as EIP-7805, aims to improve Ethereum’s censorship resistance at the protocol level by forcing validators to include all transactions. The mechanism would allow validator committees to apply fork-choice rules and inclusion lists to force the inclusion of transactions. If the proposed block fails to include legitimate public mempool transactions, the chain can fork, allowing inclusion within a limited number of slots at once. The native account abstraction mechanism is introduced in EIP-8141 and is also in the pipeline for Hegota. Ethereum’s scaling strategy has relied for years on a rollup-first roadmap, driving execution into Layer 2 networks but leaving the base layer relatively lean. But Buterin’s recent rhetoric points to a different emphasis. Instead of relying solely on rollups to improve scalability and ease user experience, Ethereum is turning its attention to improving the architecture of its base layer. Buterin has also advised longer-term structural changes. This includes embedding zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs into Layer 1 validation in a proposed “Beam Chain”. The timing is notable. High-performance Layer 1 chains like Solana have become popular for their high throughput, low fees, and simplified user experience, despite their monolithic architecture. With Ethereum’s growing modularity, these networks handle transaction processing on a single layer, reducing fragmentation. While the blockchain network’s multiple rollup model has improved scalability, it has also made issues more complex — specifically around liquidity, bridging, and user experience. As rival ecosystems seek simplicity and speed, Ethereum seems set to recalibrate. Buterin recently likened those upcoming changes to what he described as a “jet engine changes in-flight” of sorts, referencing the network’s 2022 move to proof-of-stake. He even considered multiple potentially larger transformations of Ethereum (state tree rewrites, leaner consensus, ZK-native validation, virtual machine changes). Base-layer upgrades reinforce security and neutrality Instead of fragmentation through Layer 2s and competing EVM-based chains, Ethereum’s leadership seems set upon recapturing architectural control back at the base layer. The “hard turn” has less to do with delivering throughput and more with upholding the features that the network itself was built around: censorship resistance, neutrality, and cryptographic robustness. The extent to which this recalibration is a defensive move, a stand against its high-performance rivals, or a natural evolution of Ethereum’s roadmap remains open to debate. But what is unambiguous is that Ethereum is no longer willing to rely solely on rollups for its future growth. To that end, as high-speed rivals recalibrate expectations for blockchain performance, Ethereum is betting that hardening its core — while streamlining its long-term architecture — will help position it as the industry’s bedrock settlement layer. The bet may pay off in the next phase, starting with Hegota. Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Need to know what happened in crypto today? Here is the latest news on daily trends and events impacting Bitcoin price, blockchain, DeFi, NFTs, Web3 and crypto regulation.