Ethereum-Based Polkadot Token Exploit Sees 1B Tokens Minted In Hyperbridge Attack

Radiant Capital's 2025 vulnerability is another testament to how cross-chain architectures remain among the most vulnerable to attack.
Polkadot cryptocurrency logo displayed on a phone screen and representation of cryptocurrency are seen in this illustration photo taken in Krakow, Poland on November 2, 2021. (Photo by Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Polkadot cryptocurrency logo displayed on a phone screen and representation of cryptocurrency are seen in this illustration photo taken in Krakow, Poland on November 2, 2021. (Photo by Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Profile Image
Anushka Basu·Stocktwits
Published Apr 13, 2026   |   5:55 AM EDT
Share
·
Add us onAdd us on Google
  • An attacker minted 1 billion Polkadot tokens and sold them for $237,000 on Monday, using a bridged DOT hack on Ethereum.
  • A weakness in a Hyperbridge gateway contract allowed an attacker to gain admin control and mint tokens by reusing a transaction "proof."
  • Polkadot indicated that the problem only affects DOT bridges via Hyperbridge, not its original DOT, parachains, or the core network.

Polkadot's (DOT) native token, DOT, was bridged on Ethereum (ETH) and reportedly experienced a security issue on Monday. The incident allegedly allowed an attacker to create around 1 billion tokens before selling them in a single transaction.

Lookonchain, an on-chain firm that tracks crypto tokens, shared on X that the attacker walked away with approximately 108.2 ETH, worth over $237,000 at the time. CertiK, another blockchain security firm, confirmed that the issue was an exploit of the Hyperbridge gateway contract, which connects Polkadot to Ethereum.

Screenshot 2026-04-13 at 5.46.50 AM.png
Lookonchain's post on Polkadot exploit. Source: @lookonchain/x

The attacker reused a valid “proof” from an earlier transaction instead of creating a new one, said Certik. As a result, they gained control of the admin position associated with a Polkadot token contract on Ethereum, enabling large-scale token minting.

Screenshot 2026-04-13 at 5.48.17 AM.png
Certik on Polkadot explot. Source: @CertiKAlert/x

Polkadot has since acknowledged the issue. The team clarified on X that the attack only affects DOT tokens connected to Ethereum via Hyperbridge. However, the team said that Polkadot, its parachains, and native DOT are unaffected. Furthermore, DOT transfers via alternative bridging devices have not been affected. Hyperbridge has been temporarily halted while investigations are ongoing.

Screenshot 2026-04-13 at 5.47.30 AM.png

At the time of writing, Polkadot’s price was down over 3%. Meanwhile, on a technical level, DOT's continuous decline is approaching a crucial stage, with the risk of falling below $1. On Stocktwits, retail sentiment around DOT remained in the ‘bearish’ zone, while chatter around it stayed at ‘high’ levels over the past day.

Screenshot 2026-04-13 at 5.51.45 AM.png
DOT retail sentiment and message volume on April 13 as of 5:52 a.m. ET | Source: Stocktwits

Ethereum’s price, on the other hand, was trading at $2,182, down over 1%. On Stocktwits, retail sentiment around ETH changed to ‘bullish’ from ‘neutral’ zone, while chatter remained at ‘high’ levels over the past day.

Screenshot 2026-04-13 at 4.53.38 AM.png
ETH retail sentiment on April 13 as of 5:52 a.m. ET | Source: Stocktwits

Dangers In Bridging Infrastructure

The event was another example of the ongoing security dangers in cross-chain infrastructure. Bridges are among the most vital components of the crypto industry's infrastructure, yet they remain vulnerable to attack. Attackers are increasingly targeting message verification and admin controls. Wrapped and bridged assets are still at risk, even if the main chain is safe.

A 2025 exploit cost Radiant Capital, a cross-chain lending mechanism, about $50 million. The attack targeted Ethereum's ecosystem, including EVM-compatible networks and cross-chain infrastructure like Arbitrum (ARB) and BNB Chain (BNB). The attacker exploited chain-verification flaws to withdraw funds without collateral.

Read also: ‘The Strongest Regime For Bitcoin’ Is When CPI Runs Above Short-Term Yields, And A Former Wall Street Strategist Says We're Almost There

For updates and corrections, email newsroom[at]stocktwits[dot]com.

Follow on Google News
Read about our editorial guidelines and ethics policy