uptickdntick
$NN one thing I will admit to being wrong about is the timing there’s a reason for this, but I’m not gonna get into insulting administration that’s about to hand me a huge windfall. Here’s my rationale for why it’s coming tomorrow
I could be wrong but to me it seems awkward and procedurally difficult to include NN bands in the d2d nprm without the fcc proposing how they will be used at the same time. They added 1675-1680 to d2d last week with the 1675-1680 nprm same day. How could people comment on the d2d nprm without the NN nprm. I guess they could ask commenters to base it solely on the NN petition request but it’s clumsy. I think if they add nn to d2d the will do nprm also
2
6
